Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

MoneyAM launch Simply Chart - New desktop charting package     

Bullshare - 27 Mar 2006 13:50

MoneyAM have now launched Simply Chart - a new desktop charting package. With thanks to all the beta testers who have been very quietly helping us develop this. To try it yourself click on the FREE DEMO link below.
Simply   Chart
Home Features Analytics Download / Free Demo FREE Live Share prices Buy Contact Help
Simply Chart -   One of the most comprehensive charting products
easytouse_title.gif Simply Chart, as the name suggests, is a fast and easy to use end of day desktop charting package. Compile your own lists or use the standard lists of over 3000 stocks and indices (UK). Powerful customisable analytics with over 80 overlays and indicators PLUS chart pattern scanning tools PLUS powerful drawing tools make this a 'must have' package.
FeaturesUp to 10 years historic data for 3000+ shares/indices (UK) Create your own watchlists Line, Candle and Bar charts (log or linear) Customisable display schemes 80+ customisable analytics Scan charts for patterns or indicators Fully functional drawing toolbox Fast end of day data updater Free product updates Bonus

FREE live share prices FREE Live   Prices FREE access to MoneyAM's Premier web service (worth 55). LIVE share prices, LIVE market news, fundamentals and research zone powered by Thomsons, bulletin boards and much much more!

Free   DemoFree Demo
About usTerms and Conditions SimplyChart 2006 a MoneyAM product

rpaco - 28 Mar 2006 16:00 - 51 of 124

Cheers, but it's done now so dont bother.

Andy - 28 Mar 2006 16:11 - 52 of 124

Supermum,

IanT


Many thanks for you replies, I work away from home half the month so that was an important point for me.

Piptrader - 28 Mar 2006 16:22 - 53 of 124

Ian,

I've tracked the problem down - it just goes wrong with one Display Scheme: PinkBlue. With that scheme, you either get line or OHLC bars, regardless of which bar or candlestick icon selected.

All the other Display Schemes work correctly.

Snip - 28 Mar 2006 19:03 - 54 of 124

.

barretec - 28 Mar 2006 21:31 - 55 of 124

does it work with a mac

supermum - 28 Mar 2006 22:57 - 56 of 124

no

Robb - 29 Mar 2006 07:17 - 57 of 124

Ian,

Any luck on MIKE?

ExecLine - 29 Mar 2006 09:27 - 58 of 124

What do you think, DocProc, about having TWO usernames on a single financial site?

ExecLine - 29 Mar 2006 09:27 - 59 of 124

The mind boggles, ExecLine.

ExecLine - 29 Mar 2006 09:27 - 60 of 124

Are we having what is commonly called a 'Four windows open at the same time conversation", ExecLine?

ExecLine - 29 Mar 2006 09:28 - 61 of 124

Apparently not.

Back to the drawing board.

DocProc - 29 Mar 2006 09:29 - 62 of 124

Hmmm?

I tried a little experiment withe four postings done with two using an 'ExecLine' Log In and two logged in using 'DocProc' Log In, all four windows open on my machine at the same time.

If you have two username identities on here, it would seem you have to 'Log In' (A) and 'Log Out' (A) and then 'Log In' (B) once again to make a posting with a change of your username identity.

MoneyAM does link the two usernames together and will only allow one username to be used at a time. It doesn't semm as though it is posssible to have a 'conversation' with yourself unless you log in and out and in and out, etc, etc.

I do think this is a bit 'wierd' and I don't think it is entirely satisfactory. Albeit, it will make the MoneyAM subscriber figures look great. Ah well.

Isaacs - 29 Mar 2006 10:07 - 63 of 124

Why would you want to be logged in under two users names and have a conversation with yourself anyway? Thought that was reserved was the loonies over on ADVFN.

DocProc - 29 Mar 2006 12:46 - 64 of 124

Well, there are going to be users over here with two usernames now for sure.

Probably there always were. Probably, because users post under a nickname, rather than with a real name, it isn't preventable.

Isaacs, I don't and wouldn't want to do as you suggest and post as a loonie. Nevertheless, I do have strong curiosity and merely wanted to test things out for myself.

I do think you have to watch out for 'what and how' people post on a financial site bulletin board and do your own research into things. There are loonies on the one hand and there are crafty people with strong hidden agendas on the other.

Oh, and please 'lighten up' a bit. Your post reads a little bit like a personal attack. I don't think my stuff deserves it. It was meant to be somewhat educational as well as experimental. :-)

Robb - 29 Mar 2006 14:22 - 65 of 124

Ian

Anything on the MIKE thing. Someone must know???

Thanks
Rob

Isaacs - 29 Mar 2006 14:28 - 66 of 124

Sorry wasn't meant to be a personal attack and reading it again not sure it sounds like one so perhaps it is you that needs to lighten up ;-)

Anyway just couldn't see why you were so concerned about not being able to be logged in with both names. If there must be two user names (which presumably is the only way to make things work) then surely that is preferable.

IanT(MoneyAM) - 29 Mar 2006 14:46 - 67 of 124

Robb,

Please accept my apologies, I must confess it slipped my mind - I will try to find out and get back to you as soon as possible,

Ian

Robb - 29 Mar 2006 15:50 - 68 of 124

ok Ian, no worries, thanks

Bullshare - 29 Mar 2006 16:31 - 69 of 124

Robb Its a secret formulae, not; It was a test to see if we could replicate the Bollinger Optimised Synergy System using a Price/Close indicator together with a combined Price/Volume indicator.

here is the formulae

TYP:=(HIGH+LOW+CLOSE)/3;
LL:=LLV(LOW,N);
HH:=HHV(HIGH,N);
WR:TYP+(TYP-LL);
MR:TYP+(HH-LL);
SR:2*HH-LL;
WS:TYP-(HH-TYP);
MS:TYP-(HH-LL);
SS:2*LL-HH

Looks pretty!

Robb - 29 Mar 2006 16:36 - 70 of 124

Ha, bloody hell, thats given me some homework, wish I hadn't asked :-)

Thanks.
Rob
Register now or login to post to this thread.