The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Oh so can I.

But I do drop the balls a lot.

The way you're going, you'll be losing a fair amount of your wealth on MDX. Even if you're a millionaire, my mathematically minded friend has calculated you have almost a quarter of that "invested" here - I don't believe such a tit could be a millionaire BTW. Now that is thick, sorry, but that's about as thick as you get!

Anyone remember Tadpole? And ainsoph?

Hey, Martini did ok ;)

No comment on your spelling Bouncy.shall we just sweep that one out the way quickly?

Mind you don't sweep your share certs out of the way. LOL! Normally I think it's "out of the way", but never mind. It'll be lost on you. ;-))

I think in a quick straw poll here we'll probably find you're the only one who would be prepared to watch whilst a huge amount of their wealth went round the U-bend. The point has been won. The comments on your buying levels has been won. Most of us on here only do winning. Naturally, you're the odd one out, bugsy.

I see the 121 group are doing their best to get your money back tabby.... not

B J Muncaster - 10 Dec'08 - 21:18 - 20095 of 20100

I am putting on record that despite various attempts to speak with Lexuss he is refusing to speak with me and with Gary Cressman. The action he and others are about to embark upon may deliver a mortal blow to the Company. He and others have been misled about the work put in by Gary Cressman and me and in our opinion the drivers of the misinformation have a personal and beneficial interest in seeing the Company go into adminstration.

Gary and I have no interest whatsoever in seeing the Company in administration and, again for the record, neither of us has at any time had any discussion with any party regarding administration, sale of assets, lowball bid, MBO, or any other activity not in the best interests of all shareholders as a group. Any comments to the contrary are without basis.

We have worked diligently in the best interests of the Company and have tabled propositions that, if accepted, would enable the Company to progress and have the opportunity to deliver maximum value for all shareholders. We have executed CDAs and conducted detailed due diligence into all activities undertaken by the Company. This work has been undertaken over a considerable time and involved an extraordinary amount of time and effort.

Lexuss and his associates have undertaken no serious due diligence in co-operation with the Company. They are unaware of the findings of our due diligence and in our opinion are relying entirely on unsubstantiated hearsay.

Lexuss and his associates are unaware of our propositions which would have become public within a day or so.

In the event that our propositions are not accepted, then when published they will be cause for great embarrassment to Lexuss and his associates.

We disassociate oursleves entirely from any and all activities taken or planned to be taken by Lexuss and his associates.

Oh dear. ;-0


Not visited the zoo today; that should really put the cat amongst the pigeons, jeffmack. There's a real chance they could go bust then ............. from the man himself.

Thanks for posting it.

PS

Always wait until the outcome of an uncertain position is known might be a good lesson here. We'll see.

I believed/sure there would be good news tonightit will have to wait for tomorrow nowa few on here dont miss a trick to cause troubleno harm doneRT playing every trick in the book to save his arseAndy remember what you saidlet us see who is right!!!
People to see... places to go tomorrowso I am not ducking the barragehave a nice dayIm up at 5-30


B J Muncaster - 10 Dec'08 - 23:02 - 20328 of 20334

Lexuss has been gracious and called me.

I have accepted his word that he is not attending any meeting tomorrow and I trust he has accepted mine about various matters we discussed.

This whole situation has been driven by misinformation and yet again one has to ask who it is driving an agenda seemingly aimed to disrupt positive activities. It's clear to me that Lexuss and I have common interests in seeing the Company develop.

A far as I am concerned the matter is at an end and I unreservedly apologise for any remarks made by me about Lexuss that were based upon misinformation provided to me by others.

There is a meeting tomorrow, but without Lexuss in attendance I have no concerns about the outcome.

Well I do wish all holders the best, I really do.

But as far as BJ is concerned, his has been the most disruptive presence of all in the MDX forum.
Wouldn't trust him further than I can spit - and that's worse than my juggling.

Oh dear, more dropped balls.

I guess they are very close to the edge


B J Muncaster - 10 Dec'08 - 21:27 - 20111 of 20432

Wishing4,

For the umpteenth time, the CDA in January was onerous and not necessary because prior to it being signed I was told that my approach would be rejected. So why sign it and be restricted uneccesarily?

The current CDA was signed to enable me to gather information required by funding parties, and therefore in the mutual interest of the Company and all shareholders.

Scrutes latest


SCRUTABLE - 11 Dec'08 - 01:49 - 20410 of 20472

Those who are stary eyed about BJM and what he stands for may be being carried away by despair at their losses, and are now indulging in wishful thinking. It is important that you keep your feet on the ground and focus only on the facts.

BJM has been here before. Originally he was CEO. Between 1999 and 2003 the company LOST $27+m I repeat $27+m
http://www.secinfo.com/d14D5a.13Jxt.htm#1stPageAround 2002/3.

BJM had to stand down but was instrumental in getting his close friend Graham Hind elected as replacement, and continued to act as a 'consultant' calling the shots at arms length. A good question is to ask him if there was any loss of income from the change.

Listing on AIM in May 2003 BPRG then raised a further 5m followed by 6.6m five months later in December, but in consequence of a daft strategy, the company earned no regular income in the UK, and apart from a floundering acquisition of Aquafilm in Tampa, received only one or two sums of 100,000 for options to acquire a licence.

An attractive profit forecast was made around the time when GH sold a substantial number of shares 'to pay for his daughter's house'. This was followed after an indecently short time by a profits warning, and was naturally badly received. That year, the company lost 7.1m but immediately assured investors it was in sound health.

A month before the company would have gone belly up, GH was replaced by RT and the rakes progress was brought to a halt. Overheads were immediatel cut by 1m/month, involving termination of BJMs exhorbitant consultancy fee, and GH's also exhorbitant travel expenses.

The company was then gingerly nursed back to health by Dec 2006 and showed cash balance of 6.5m. A year later we had the Aquisitek approach unbacked by shares owned and the cash outflow increased, accelerating after the CEO, then RT, was engineered out of office without explanation.

Surprise surprise Barry is now back claiming executive control of the board in cahoots with the 2 Ks.

Do you really want a repeat of the brilliant strategic thinking dominating the company before 2005?

And more


SCRUTABLE - 11 Dec'08 - 02:44 - 20416 of 20474

The previous post was all my own work.

I have not read this thread for a few days, but see that the collective madness is building up and seems close to getting out of control.

None of it comes through the umbelical cord, which it has been put about by the paranoid, that I am supposed to share with RT - just because I have lived in Wimbledon for 50 years.

I have never spoken to lexus. nor did I know his real name until today

I do not like directors or consultants who abuse their position in public companies to syphon off money not in their contract. Nor do I like professionals who post here as fellow shareholders but have taken substantial sums of money from the company but have never declared their interest.

I am particularly intrigued with the increasing shortage of cash at MDX this year despite the amounts originally in the bank, and since earned or raised. Noone in the company seems to be able to account for it.

I have been posting lateral and disturbing thoughts re this company for five years long before RT came in and saved its budget but went on to upset people by his lack of empathy and human psychology. He certainly upset me at two successive AGMs and on subsequent occasions, but I always admired his brilliant marketing strategy (NOT his marketing skills). So much for my objectivity and partisanship

I have clashed with Barry before, notably because of his ignorance of international marketing, and his contempt for people who know more about anything than he does. I am curious to know how good is his relationship with the two Ks.

I do not believe that the current stand off is at all concerned with stopping the sale of Dexo if it is the only quick asset available. I do believe that the company is selling the high margin business to rescue the low margin Melbrosin. I imagine that Melbrosin was in a great financial mess when acquired; that it has taken more of its share of MDX resources than the Rx side has done; and is in better shape now. It would be strategically preferable for several reasons to sell off Melbrosin rather than Dexo.

Anyone who is confident of information to the contrary is welcome to convince me. I am as easily impressed with facts as I am contemptuous of a personal agenda full of spin.

Finally I believe that the company's IP is worth many , many times the current cap.
The FMC contract must have matured substantially over the last three years. With a management capable of making high margins and growing operational cash flow this company is still worth backing. BJM has never remotely shown that he can deliver this.

Edited by Jonathan @ MoneyAM - while (subjectively) amusing banter, not really suitable for a bulletin board of this calibre.

Gausieme to!.I think bouncy has gone back to work on his castlestill life goes onoff for a glass

Edited by Jonathan @ MoneyAM - while (subjectively) amusing banter, not really suitable for a bulletin board of this calibre.

Edited by Jonathan @ MoneyAM - while (subjectively) amusing banter, not really suitable for a bulletin board of this calibre.

LOL!

Can still see from my castle, numbskull - always could. You truly have no idea, Tabatha. ;-))))))))))