Crocodile
- 16 Dec 2002 03:59
Spaceman
- 18 Oct 2006 14:59
- 5130 of 11003
Bolshi, I would recommmend that initially he runs Adaware and Spybot as usual but removing the memory resident parts (tea Timer on Spybot S&D if I remember correctly).
If after a few weeks he finds that these extra scans find very little then reduce the frequency.
Its usefull to have more than one tool available so dont delete at least thise two and keep them up-to-date.
I would also recommend having another virus scan tool available, one of the free online ones will do (e.g. Panda) again a preiodic scan with an alternative tool is worthwhile and in an emergency it might save your data.
The Other Kevin
- 18 Oct 2006 14:59
- 5131 of 11003
I run that setup with no conflicts. Whether it's advisable or not is another matter. Someone more knowledgeable than me will answer that.
Spaceman
- 18 Oct 2006 15:01
- 5132 of 11003
Just to add to my post 5130, those products will probably all run together fine however the memory resident parts may cause the machine to slow down as they are all processing the same things.
Also personally I dont line Norton Internet Security its a resource hog.
DocProc
- 18 Oct 2006 15:06
- 5133 of 11003
Adaware would be OK to use alone, IMHO and I would discontinue using the other two.
My preference for Antivirus Protection is towards EZ Antivirus.
I don't find it unusual to hear you using the words 'Norton' and 'conflicts' in the same sentence. I've read them in that context before. Therefore, I'm more than OK personally with EZ Antivirus.
And then there's Windows Updates, which need keeping up to date.
And also the need to have and use a Firewall.
ThePublisher
- 18 Oct 2006 15:21
- 5134 of 11003
Sp,
I don't like Norton. Creates too many non-removeable files, that other software resents.
If you want a new name try PC-Cillin from Trend Micro.
TP
The Other Kevin
- 19 Oct 2006 08:16
- 5135 of 11003
Can't resist Norton - it comes as a freebie with my BT connection.
PeterG
- 19 Oct 2006 11:14
- 5136 of 11003
A bit more info about my spam problem (post 5096). Thanks to the guys who responded, but this isn't an Outlook Express problem. I probably didn't describe my email setup well enough...
A couple of years back I changed ISP twice and my email address changed twice. I thought a better idea would be to register my own internet domain - let's say it's www.peterg.com - so I could always keep the same email. I then used a hosting company with a mail forwarding service and told them to forward all mail arriving for anything@peterg.com to my ISP email account, let's say peterg@btinternet.com.
Everything was going fine and, as an extra bonus, the forwarding company scans all email passing through the system for viruses. Then about 10 days ago I suddenly started getting "Returned Mail - Delivery Failure" notices for mails I'd never sent. Looking at the email headers it looks like some spamming b*st**d has hijacked @peterg.com to send out spam. Looking at the message source I found "senders" like "From: Osmond Patel '< 'jchq @peterg.com'>' ". Definitely not from me!
I contacted the hosting company and they told me that these spam attacks usually only last a few days and there's not much I can do about it. Today it looks like the volume of return notices is starting to decrease. Still, it's pretty scary because people all over the place are getting spam that they think is from me :-(
I still don't know if there's any way I can find out who is doing this?
Self19
- 19 Oct 2006 11:32
- 5137 of 11003
Optimist - i'm taking your advice to get a pc to use as a remote for my mac - do i need it to have xp or will 2000 be good enough.
thanks Nick.
hilary
- 19 Oct 2006 12:44
- 5138 of 11003
PeterG,
If you use Outlook 2k3, you should be able to right click over the dubious message and then click the tab called Options. A box will appear and at the bottom it will say Internet headers. Therein will lay the IP address of the eejit who's sending the spam which will probably turn out to be a hosting company somewhere in Silicon Valley.
If you paste the IP address up here, MM will probably tell you who they are and how to contact them.
Unfortunately, I don't know if that proceedure will work with other email clients.
skg83239
- 19 Oct 2006 12:57
- 5139 of 11003
PeterG
The "Returned Mail - Delivery Failure" notices are as a result of a spoof emailer program either as a result of a virus or SMTP mail server hijacking.
The spoof emailer program uses the contacts list of the affected computer, picking a victim to appear as the sender the sending mails to others on the contact list.
You may be able to find the originating computer by looking at the "Returned Mail - Delivery Failure" notice by looking back at the route the message took. The originating computer will be the IP address after the last "Received: from" in the message. You can inform the virus victim and hopefully the will clean the virus out.
If SMTP mail server has been hijacked the problem is more complicated. Have a look at
Spoofed/forged email
skg
Bullshare
- 19 Oct 2006 13:05
- 5140 of 11003
REDMOND, Wash. (AFX) - Microsoft Corp. is giving its Web browser software its first major upgrade in years, amid signs that Internet Explorer's market share is eroding.
The release late Wednesday brings Microsoft's browser more in line with competing products such as Opera Software ASA's Opera and Mozilla Corp.'s Firefox. Internet Explorer 7, or IE7, adds features such as tabbed browsing, which lets people open several Web pages without cluttering their desktop with multiple open browser windows.
Microsoft has been heavily testing the new browser, releasing five beta versions over 14 months, and has periodically offered security updates for IE6, first released in 2001.
Still, a lag of more than five years between official releases has cost the company. Web analysis company WebSideStory estimates that Internet Explorer's U.S. market share is about 86 percent, while Firefox commands about 11 percent of the market and smaller offerings account for the rest. Two years ago, IE had about a 93 percent share.
Dean Hachamovitch, Microsoft's general manager for Internet Explorer, acknowledged the company could have done more sooner, but he said the new version should address users' concerns.
'We did have active development,' he said. 'The question is whether it was enough.'
Matt Rosoff, analyst with independent researchers Directions on Microsoft, said Internet Explorer is important to Microsoft's business because most people believe an operating system should include a way to immediately access the Web.
Still, he said, Microsoft may not have seen much reason to spend a lot of money upgrading sooner since most people continued to use the older version.
Rosoff said the new product includes enough improvements to lure back some users.
But Colin Teubner, an analyst with Forrester Research, said people already using Firefox and rival products might not immediately come back. That's partly because those users have soured on Microsoft, he said, and partly because IE7 doesn't break much new ground.
'A year ago Firefox was head and shoulders above Microsoft's current offering, and I think even with IE7 it's mostly playing catch up,' Teubner said.
But he does recommend that IE6 users upgrade, and he believes Microsoft may surpass competitors with future improvements.
Besides tabbed browsing, Microsoft has improved security to help keep users from falling victim to things like malicious software attacks and phishing scams. Microsoft products are a near-constant target of Internet attackers, and some people have recommended switching browsers because a less high-profile product might be more secure.
The Redmond software maker also has added a box in the browser that lets people search the Internet without going to a separate Web page, much like competitors.
In a last-minute change, people who are upgrading from the previous version of the browser will now have a clearer way to choose whether they want to use Microsoft's search engine or a competing one from companies like Google Inc. or Yahoo Inc. The change announced Friday was one of several aimed at soothing antitrust worries in Europe, where Microsoft faces a longrunning regulatory battle.
IE7 will be available as a free download beginning Wednesday evening. Next month, the company also will begin delivering it to Windows XP users who have signed up to automatically receive security fixes. Hachamovitch said that's because the product makes major security improvements.
Such distribution also will provide a powerful tool in countering competition from rival browsers.
Security updates typically download with little or no user intervention, but with IE7 people will get an extra opportunity to elect not to upgrade. Also, even people using automatic updates will have to agree to let Microsoft check whether their copy of Windows is pirated before they can get IE7.
Microsoft expects that it will take months to gradually release IE7 automatically. The browser also will be an integral part of Microsoft's new operating system, Windows Vista, due out for big businesses in November and for consumers in January.
Bolshi
- 19 Oct 2006 13:32
- 5141 of 11003
I've just downloaded IE7. It seems to have cured one or two of the irritating bugs from the Beta version.
Balerboy
- 19 Oct 2006 21:17
- 5142 of 11003
Hi all,
For some reason on the SEO board I can only view the last four pages, all others before are blank. Any idea why? All other boards load at the last page viewed no problem.
Thanks Tony.
scussy
- 20 Oct 2006 04:22
- 5144 of 11003
looks like NTL have upped the download speed in my area to 20 Mb/s and the up is 718b/s,
i think they are testing,looks good here,
10/20/2006 GMT 16855 kb/s 718 kb/s 17 ms London
10/20/2006 GMT 16736 kb/s 718 kb/s 12 ms London
Your Connection
Speed Test Results
Downstream 19,058.1 Kbps ( = 18.6 Mbps )
Upstream 718.7 Kbps ( = 0.7 Mbps )
Your Connection
Speed Test Results
Downstream 18,905.5 Kbps ( = 18.5 Mbps )
Upstream 719.5 Kbps ( = 0.7 Mbps )
why did they not tell us it's going to happen,
i have just gone back to BT on my phones lines and i was thinking of changing to ADSL,
but i think i will stay with NTL cable for internet now the speed is up,
as above from two speed test sites,
http://www.adslguide.org.uk/tools/speedtest.asp
http://www.speedtest.net
steve
just see this from the cable router
CABLE MODEM
Cable Modem Operation Configuration
Network Access : Allowed
Maximum Downstream Data Rate : 20480000
Maximum Upstream Data Rate : 768000
Maximum Upstream Channel Burst : 1600
Maximum Number of CPEs : 1
Modem Capability : Concatenation Enabled, Fragametation Enabled, PHS Disabled
scussy
- 20 Oct 2006 05:16
- 5145 of 11003
Marketingweek, is reporting that ntl:Telewest is apparently plotting a major Valentines day re-launch under the Virgin name,
according to industry sources. An inside source of ntl and Telewest has apparently reported the ntl and Telewest brands will be scrapped and replaced with the brand name,
Virgin Media, on February 14th 2007.
PeterG
- 20 Oct 2006 13:52
- 5146 of 11003
Thanks Hilary, skg for your comments. I checked the originating IP addresses in the last 6 Delivery Failure notices... and found 6 different addresses. I guess that means I can't easily find out who's behind this. Things are looking up though: so far today - fingers crossed, touch wood - I've only had a couple of failure notices. Hopefully the spammer's moved on to some other poor sod...
Kayak
- 22 Oct 2006 17:21
- 5147 of 11003
Haystack, if you still have the problem, check in Tools/Internet Options/Connections in IE that 'Never dial a connection' is set.
Kayak
- 22 Oct 2006 17:27
- 5148 of 11003
TP, before doing all that you could try a better aerial on the router as well as the laptop. See
http://www.solwiseforum.co.uk/downloads/files/wireless-around-the-home.pdf for some ideas.
ThePublisher
- 22 Oct 2006 18:00
- 5149 of 11003
Kayak,
As I already had a pair of the Devolo socket devices I decided to see if they worked and they worked a treat. So easy to configure.
From an earlier attempt, abandoned in the end, to get the WiFi to the far end of the apartment I'd also bought, but not used, a Belkin Wireless extender. That also worked with minimal fiddling around when attached to the remote end of the Devolo and I even worked out how to set the WEP.
Both bits of kit I'd already bought so the job has not involved in spending any more money. However, were I starting again I'd have bought the newer homeplug set-up where the receiver also has a WiFi transmitter inbuilt. One less component to install. And presumably one could buy extra receiver sockets and add WiFi to room after room.
TP