Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


paulmasterson1 - 01 Jun 2005 10:10 - 5149 of 27111

driver - 01 Jun'05 - 10:10 - 5147 of 5147 (Filtered)

driver - 01 Jun 2005 10:17 - 5150 of 27111

paulmasterson1
What's that about?

Chiva20 - 01 Jun 2005 10:18 - 5151 of 27111

What a bizarre comment Karen. Very out of the blue and not in psynch with the rest of opinion out there. Can I humbly request you back it up with something of substance? Without which your post sounds like fly away bashing rubbish? Or someone we know purporting to be a new poster. No offence intended, but 0.5 points of selling today is nothing to be alarmed about or start talking about supposed bad rumours - which I'm sure I'm not alone in not hearing anywhere?

karen33 - 01 Jun 2005 10:20 - 5152 of 27111

Well I certainly seem to have disturbed something with my posting haven't I?

"No-one has explained the selling yet. Lots of baloney but no explanations at all. My feeling is that people are selling because of bad rumours and also because others are selling. Stanelco doesn't seem the best of places to keep your money at the moment. Maybe another time."

One has to wonder why it should have attracted a filtered posting and another less than kind response within minutes??? Especially so were the share a promising one and one that could stand on its own merit. I mean, why would anyone need to worry about what I said if things were really so hunky-dorry?? After all, it's only an exercise in free speech that I give and the world is a better place for that, wouldn't you agree??

I repeat my sentiments regarding this share and empahasise it with the addition that it is my strongest opinion that it is an over-priced share and and one that is ready to fall back some way before picking up momentum again -and that time may be a year or two off yet.

paulmasterson1 - 01 Jun 2005 10:25 - 5153 of 27111


Well you just proved you have NO FACTS, just bashing drivel.

Opions are based on FACT, if you have none, you have no worthwhile opinion.

karen33 - 01 Jun'05 - 10:20 - 5151 of 5151 (Filtered)

Go back to advfn where you might find someone who listens to that kind of crap !!!!

PM

Fred1new - 01 Jun 2005 10:39 - 5154 of 27111

Karen. I think you are quite correct to question this share. But the sales to-day so far add up to 250000 out of a capitalisation of 250million.
A very small shift of opinion or lack of it.
Also I believe there was large late buy yesterday of about 500000. (I think it was this share.)

But any body thinking boards like this have any real effect on ultimate SP are in Cloud Cuckoo Land. Even though sometimes they can be amusing and occasionally informative, but are often the blind leading the blind. Your opinion is as valid as all others, but some on this board may have invested the kitchen sink and their anxiety are evident.


Have a nice day and I hope the SP is up over the day.

Chiva20 - 01 Jun 2005 10:45 - 5155 of 27111

? Karen - I don't believe my comments were 'less than kind' nor do I believe I didn't pass my opinion as to the selling

As far as I understand you believe SEO is about to tumble because out of the blue you posted something negative and antagonised two regular posters. A very odd way to make investment decisions.

By that rationale you could go to any thread of a succesful share, post a conflicting unsubstantiated comment and as soon as any poster then responded contradicting your view you can suggest that 'why would anyone need to worry about what I said if things were really so hunky-dorry??'

What a load of rubbish. Either come back with something intelligent or prepare to lose all credibility here

paulmasterson1 - 01 Jun 2005 10:51 - 5156 of 27111

Fred Hi,

The buy yesterday after the close was just over 1.1m shares.

I am not anxious about anything, I am here for 3-5 years, so WTF would I be anxious ?

Anyone who comes here bashing my investment, will get the same treatment as Karen33.

The MCap is based on the EXPECTED 200 machines from ASDA, and more next year, plus the anticipation of a USA, Canada and Mexico rollout starting this year, and Europe rollout starting next year.

If all shares were based on current value, bprg would be 1p not 36p.

Valid opinions are based on facts, and there are no facts to back up the basher opinion, so they just post scaremongering rubbish, which I will urge others to ignore.

Cheers,
PM

P.S. yes I do hate bashers.



driver - 01 Jun 2005 11:01 - 5157 of 27111

Chiva20 or any one
Could you ask paulmasterson1 why he has (Filtered) me, not that I am bothered just bemused.

Chiva20 - 01 Jun 2005 11:04 - 5158 of 27111

I've absolutely no idea Driver. Very odd - sorry I had to laugh especially at your bemused response. PM1 what have you filtered driver for?

driver - 01 Jun 2005 11:19 - 5159 of 27111

Paul
Im waiting?

Chiva20 - 01 Jun 2005 11:23 - 5160 of 27111

I think he may have some personal issue with doughnut comments Driver.

paulmasterson1 - 01 Jun 2005 11:25 - 5161 of 27111


Driver Hi,

Apologies, I seem to have filtered the wrong person :O

Can't think how I managed to do that, probably clicked on you when I meant to click on someone else !

I just wen't back to my first post and read from there, and cannot see any reason for filtering you.

Again my humblest apologies, champagne on me at the 1Bn party :)

Cheers,
PM

paulmasterson1 - 01 Jun 2005 11:26 - 5162 of 27111

Chiva Hi,

I thinks it's me that was the doughnut or rather DOH-NUT !

Cheers,
PM

insiderinside - 01 Jun 2005 11:33 - 5163 of 27111

Karen33 I find it most hilarious that they ask you to post fact but mostly themselves post only spin hype and ramp.

Facts SE0 have one order for one machine from one supplier.
Facts Interims end of this month are most likely to be a heavy loss
Facts Unless they get a good 70+ orders by October 31st then prelims 2006 will be most likely a heavy loss.
Facts There is no categorical defined saving in power just up to
Facts There is no categorical defined increase in shelf like from RF sealing as no definition if the trial product was MAP or non-MAP before conversion.
Facts There is no categorical defined saving in material just up to
Facts Walmart have expressed no official interest in Green Seal
Facts Only Asda have expressed an interest in Green Seal and order.
Facts Nobody knows what the conversion or license fee is or its period of years.
Facts There is no official confirmed interest in Frogpack from anyone.
Facts All reports and tips are based on preposition imaginary not from fact.
Facts Fact means not using the words expected hope for anticipate should be could be maybe potentially and the like.

Find a report or article where it claims clear and defined details not just up to and the other fairy words defined details (not we believe)

There is a severe lack of fact surrounding the goings on a severe lack of confirmed and datum set detail. Everyone knows when you run a trial you set clear datums and guidelines but the results have been we believe answers therefore without confirmed datums and detail they are non factual.

IMO the next RNS will be 1 machine in the USA either sold at a low price to grab headlines or if things are going badly then just another trial which will incur cost for SE0 with no definite sales after just like the other trials with Oscar Mayer. I presume we will be offered no details on pricing license term or value yet again (the facts people want to see)and thats if its a sale and not yet another trial followed by order of 1 at ????? price with no details on any license term or fee.

Karen feel free to comment and ask them back for real FACTS not HOPES and HYPES EXPECTS POTENTIAL WE BELIEVE ANTICIPATE COULD BE UP TO.

driver - 01 Jun 2005 11:33 - 5164 of 27111

paulmasterson1
Apologies accepted.

Chiva
Thanks.

driver - 01 Jun 2005 11:35 - 5165 of 27111

Not again
Share bashing can seriously damage your wealth.

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5028

jimmy b - 01 Jun 2005 11:43 - 5166 of 27111

Its funny someone always comes on and has a bash before insider, I think Karen is insider.

insiderinside - 01 Jun 2005 11:45 - 5167 of 27111

jimmy b - 01 Jun'05 - 11:43 - 5165 of 5165

Its funny someone always comes on and has a bash before insider, I think Karen is insider.


Not me jimmy b - but anyway - how can asking for fact and stating fact be bashing ? LOL

jimmy b - 01 Jun 2005 11:51 - 5168 of 27111

If you come up with an opinion i have no problem with that , but dont bash , and who's Karen ? just be yourself .
Register now or login to post to this thread.