Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

should they not rename the party the hitler party

I don't believe Mitchell said pleb. I still think it was a stitch up.

He lost his case, because Thrasher was an arrogant little man full of self conceit and attempting to abuse his position, which he was not fit to hold.

To lose one's temper, is acceptable, but lying and trying to divert attention from his abuse of a person attempting to do his job is not acceptable.

It was the "abuse" which was the problem, trying to evade, or interpret the action subsequently was a diversion. If he had been less arrogant he would have apologised on the "spot" or later, the whole event would have been lost in history.

I, like the public in general. have little pity for him.


Probably the same will apply to Cameron and Osborne and few more, after they lose the election in May and the books are opened for examination.

or the devil party

Mitchell lied and still lying a nasty peace of evil scum

Tanker is the closest to Hitler on here.

hays the problem with your post is I help people you and this gov want to kill them off
the torys will not win the next election .people like you must be evil to support them
so that tells me you are not of this country

have i missed anything new on here during the day?
i suspect not :-)

Haze.

I am not aware of what the Tinker is posting, but I think that you would have been one of the first in the Berlin Bunker with Goebbels. Many of your postings seem as deluded as some which the latter made.

I quite like this one Alf http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=8123&from=51832

.. not that I'm biased at all.

LOL! Have another pint TANK.

c c off to the club at 5 pm meeting on next years bowls

Blimey TANK that's early our AGM isn't till January. £2.60 a pint I'll be voting for no increase :0)

he actually meant bowels (and piles)

This is a very interesting article, confirming what I have been saying for some time

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/12/01/uniform-swing-rip/

This is based on current polls. Even a slight increase for the Conservatives will give them the most seats

i was under the impression that for some time you had been shouting the odds of the conservatives getting and overall majority ....... fat chance!

I have been saying that the Conservatives will get most seats. I also hope that they will get a majority. There are two budgets to go yet. One this Wednesday and one in March. Still 6 months to go.

This will be displayed on the political placards in the run up of "CARE UNDER CONSERVATIVES".

The home care system in England is close to crisis because of the way workers are exploited, a report says.

The review, led by former Care Minister Paul Burstow, found a combination of inadequate funding and poor working practices was putting people at risk.

About 500,000 older and disabled people rely on home care for daily tasks such as washing and dressing. Some pay for it, but others get help from councils.

But the report said zero-hours contracts and low pay was harming care.

The review was set up by the Local Government Information Unit think tank and home care provider Mears, after a number of scandals in residential care homes.

It analysed existing data as well as taking evidence from those in involved in the sector and concluded it was "only a matter of time" before there was a major scandal in home care.

If found about 60% of care workers were employed on zero-hours contracts, while there were many staff - up to a third - who were effectively not being paid the minimum wage because they are not paid while travelling between clients.

'Completely unacceptable'
These practices contributed to a high turnover rate in the sector with over a fifth of staff leaving their jobs each year - twice the national average.

The lack of stability meant that those receiving care were often faced with short visits and constant changes in staff - there were reports of some people having up to 50 different carers in a year.

Mr Burstow said: "The price of poor care is paid for by the most frail and vulnerable in our community and by the care workers they rely on, who get a raw deal."



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-30278034


Or as the Cons will claim Business as usual

Watch out Manuel and Haze, you never know what is around the corner and you care make cost a fortune by them!

1 seat barely constitutes "most" and methinks you distort your earlier protestations
looks to me that we're in for a really awful period of very weak gov't, not that this one has shown much backbone, albeit that they inherited a poisoned chalice