bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Sequestor
- 01 Jun 2005 16:22
- 5194 of 27111
here we go, its gonna SOAR
Hard to believe people actually live in dreadful places like Doncaster, still I suppose the lower orders have to exist.
Chiva20
- 01 Jun 2005 16:28
- 5195 of 27111
Lol Seq, I'd love to know what you do full time. Are you a punchbag?
Sequestor
- 01 Jun 2005 16:29
- 5196 of 27111
Chiva20 - 01 Jun'05 - 16:28 - 5194 of 5194 (Filtered)
I expect he is from some dreadful place too, Birmingham probably.
hewittalan6
- 01 Jun 2005 16:32
- 5197 of 27111
Didn't Seq write that book. How to influence people without winning friends??
Alan
Chiva20
- 01 Jun 2005 16:34
- 5198 of 27111
Seq; bothered!
From Richmond, London; not that it makes one iota of difference where you're from you great plank.
jimmy b
- 01 Jun 2005 16:36
- 5199 of 27111
He could charm the birds from the trees..
Sequestor
- 01 Jun 2005 16:37
- 5200 of 27111
Chiva20 - 01 Jun'05 - 16:34 - 5197 of 5197 (Filtered)
I expect thats him confirming his residence, Brum one hears, well it rhymes with dumb.
watcher
- 01 Jun 2005 16:40
- 5201 of 27111
the banter got worse as the day went on. But with the price steady I think the picture is becoming clear that it is holding its own at this level, now where is my crystal ball to settle the future, cloudy or sunny, hummmmmm.
watcher, donny sounds fine for the celebration
Sequestor
- 01 Jun 2005 17:25
- 5203 of 27111
THANK cHRIST-LOL!!!!!!!!
bosley
- 01 Jun 2005 18:23
- 5204 of 27111
another good, steady day. same as yesterday , really.
insiderinside
- 01 Jun 2005 18:41
- 5205 of 27111
Who got removed ? Missed that - who was it ?
ptholden
- 01 Jun 2005 20:49
- 5206 of 27111
The recent daily SEO SP activity reminds me of ASOS on its way to 90p (not suggesting that SEO will get that far, cos that would be ramping). But as Eric would remember, we had a continued debate over when ASOS would run out of steam. Needless to say I was a lot more pessimistic than young Eric and often took heart that during the day the price would slip with the Bears in charge, but by the end of the day the Bulls would return and steady the ship. After a few days or a week, the SP would then start to make the next leg up. Probably totally irrvelevant, but just thought I would mention it. My own prediction for the next leg (up) is the 14th June. Assuming the wheels don't fall off in the mean time!
pth
paulmasterson1
- 01 Jun 2005 20:56
- 5207 of 27111
Hi All,
Well as I was saying :)
UK sells AM, USA buys them all PM, we have a lot of support in the good 'ol US of A(minus ii that is !)
Nice to finish level at the close, and if UK investors are taking note of the daily price movement, and the MM buys today(900,000 shares in all), I feel we will finish up tomorrow and friday, heading back to 28p maybe more, also people often buy with the hope of weekend press leaks, and/or a Monday RNS.
Cheers,
PM
paulmasterson1
- 01 Jun 2005 21:04
- 5208 of 27111
Hi All,
ii posted on another site where I am the only SEO poster, he has blatantly got a big problem with me, must be a real psycho, stalking me everywhere !!!!
Anyway, he posted the FT article 5 times, once at the end of each subject I had posted, in the hope it would deramp the stock !!!!
Funny thing is, they know what a loony he is, and it seems they took the large percentage of positives, rather than the small percentage of negatives :))))
I wonder what I will post there next to add to the positives they already know about :))))
http://www.gurufocus.com
Cheers,
PM
bosley
- 01 Jun 2005 23:04
- 5209 of 27111
ptholden, you are not the first to see the similarities between the movements of seo and asos last year. andys, i know sometimes it's difficult, but, try to ignore the dross. we really should be used to it by now , as the same dross gets repeated everytime the price moves upwards. once the retracment kicks in, the same old "told -you so-what-a-crap-share-seo-is" dross begins!
bhunt1910
- 01 Jun 2005 23:25
- 5210 of 27111
Hi Bos - wish I could pick up more dross shares like SEO !
night night
Baza
EWRobson
- 01 Jun 2005 23:50
- 5211 of 27111
Glad BullShare is monitoring the thread: not sure whether it was ASMITH2 or Karen he got rid of. Surprising that ii is tolerated but it may not be seen as a crime to distort facts. At least he is consistent and has a quite amazing ego, like his Don Quixote forerunner, thinking he is the only one right when, surprise, surpise, investors do listen to the respected pundits and industry figures like Ruane of ASDA.
I was making a point about the Economic S-Curve the other day and it may be worth giving a quotation as it is important in trying to judge the potential value of an emerging company with a product/service which breaks the mould.
"All new products and technologies go through three stages of growth: an innovation phase, a growth phase and a maturity phase. It takes about the same time for a new technology or product to go from zero to 10% adoption (the innovation phase) as it does for it to go from 10% to 90% adoption (growth phase) and as it does from 90% to 100% (maturity phase). These three stages are shown graphically in what is called an S-curve." (Dent)
This theory would say that the gradient of the growth phase would typically be 8 times that of the innovation phase. If Howard White sees the obtainable market as 25,000 machines then the first phase could be 2500 machines, covering the ASDA exclusivity period and the initial US contracts and perhaps first moves into Europe and far east. There may be pressure to bring back prices in the growth phase, perhaps due to competition or from the aim to optimise market penetration. Pricing issues tend not to assert their heads in the innovation phase as, for the companies involved, competitive advantage is more important than price constraints.
Risk is clearly highest during the innovation period and that is why the risk adverse investor should probably leave SEO alone until it is further down the line. If major problems did emerge, then the sales volume might not build up to a level to support the present cap. But risk is two-sided: nothing ventured, nothing gained. The upside potential is huge and the figures quoted by PaulMasterson and andysmith could well happen. My point is that there are probably better arguments for a cap of 50M or for a cap of 1billion than for the present level of 250m, except as a temporary resting point for moving from A to B.
Eric
bosley
- 02 Jun 2005 07:07
- 5212 of 27111
morning. no news. considering the lack of news , the price has held up well.
halfamil
- 02 Jun 2005 07:45
- 5213 of 27111
Morning all.
After the "damp squib" accusation in the Guardian I believe the company will hold back on announcing anything which is not substantial.I read an opinion somewhere that the company is not legally obliged to issue an rns each time a machine is signed up. Seems logical. The waiting gets a bit nerve-racking though.