Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

FTSE + FTSE 250 - consider trading (FTSE)     

cynic - 20 Oct 2007 12:12

rather than pick out individual stocks to trade, it can often be worthwhile to trade the indices themselves, especially in times of high volatility.

for those so inclined, i attach below charts for FTSE and FTSE 250, though one might equally be tempted to trade Dow or S&P, which is significantly broader in its coverage, or even NASDAQ

for ease of reading, i have attached 1 year and 3 month charts in each instance

bhunt1910 - 06 May 2010 20:00 - 5209 of 21973

King Hell

ravey davy gravy - 06 May 2010 20:10 - 5210 of 21973

Knowing the US it will finish up :-))

cynic - 06 May 2010 20:12 - 5211 of 21973

you wouldn't be able to jimmy - and i'm serious

Camelot - 06 May 2010 20:20 - 5212 of 21973

9872 low

Chris Carson - 06 May 2010 20:21 - 5213 of 21973

Shit where did I put those sleeping pills!

jimmy b - 06 May 2010 20:22 - 5214 of 21973

ravey :-) ........cynic i believe you.

jimmy b - 06 May 2010 20:24 - 5215 of 21973

Osama having a street fight with Obama and he was ahead on points but Obama's coming back in to it . It must be something llike that .

required field - 06 May 2010 21:20 - 5216 of 21973

Job to understand all this.....

jeffmack - 06 May 2010 21:26 - 5217 of 21973

Latest rumor
Written by Jamie Coleman
May 6, 2010 at 19:44 GMT

Major US bank had an order to sell $15 mln of S&P e-mini contracts. Accidentally sold $15 bln

splat - 06 May 2010 22:42 - 5218 of 21973

I went long INDU @ 10,043 and currently reasonably pleased :)

dealerdear - 06 May 2010 22:44 - 5219 of 21973

The biggest crisis yet perhaps (the end of the West?) ... and we are about to vote in a new leader.

Really sensible that. Irrespective of your politics, the last thing we need tomorrow is a new man at the helm. My instincts say there will be another election very soon as the markets tumble.

Camelot - 07 May 2010 00:37 - 5220 of 21973

apparently Proctor and Gamble was trading around $60 when it suddenly started trading at $30

as its in the index, the index dived, triggered stop loss positions and bobs your uncle

originated out of the nasdaq system

jkd - 07 May 2010 02:02 - 5221 of 21973

reminds me of that story about the last train uphill being easier if empty and with no passengers or cargo.Toot! Toot! i could well be dislodged and dumped out tomorrow. i actually dont mind.just my own view and opinion.i am actually doing ok. glad i wasnt watching today.(thurs) shan't be watching Fri either.
regards
jkd

HARRYCAT - 07 May 2010 16:42 - 5222 of 21973

DOW down over 100 points again so far, with no particular reason that I can see. Looks like a friday sell-off with nervous traders following yesterday's debacle (Procter/Gamble).

required field - 07 May 2010 16:43 - 5223 of 21973

Down another 100 points ...how about my shirt ?....

halifax - 07 May 2010 16:58 - 5224 of 21973

cynic Nymex hits $75 as predicted where to from here?

cynic - 07 May 2010 17:04 - 5225 of 21973

don't forget that a strong $ has an inverse effect of both oil and gold .... thus, in last week's(??) ROE terms, oil is still about $85 ..... leaving forex considerations aside, my own view is that $75/85 is now the "natural" level for oil, though i confess i have no logic to support that assertion

Balerboy - 08 May 2010 23:52 - 5226 of 21973

A dramatic fall in the Dow Jones industrial average appears to have been caused by a trader hitting the button for 'billion' not 'million'.

The Dow Jones fell by nearly 1,000 points, and the Nasdaq and New York Stock Exchange announced that all trades more than 60 per cent above or below market that occurred between 2.40pm and 3.00pm New York time would be cancelled.

A report on CNBC said that the problem came when a deal involving Proctor & Gamble shares was incorrectly entered.

Advertisement
"We, along with the rest of the financial industry, are investigating to find the source of today's market volatility," Citigroup said in a statement. "At this point we have no evidence that Citi was involved in any erroneous transaction."

Proctor & Gamble shares fell by over a third on the day's trading.

"We don't know what caused it," said Procter & Gamble spokeswoman Jennifer Chelune. "We know that that was an electronic trade, and we're looking into it with Nasdaq and the other major electronic exchanges."


KEAYDIAN - 09 May 2010 22:35 - 5227 of 21973

Great, does that mean I get some losses back?

jkd - 09 May 2010 23:08 - 5228 of 21973

K
only if you hung in there and didnt sell. then you get your losses back by virtue of default. i.e you didnt take them. for my part i did take some of them on friday.some were actual losses, others were losses of unrealised profits, i.e. smaller profits than may have otherwise been. such is the way.
regards
jkd
.
Register now or login to post to this thread.