Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

FTSE + FTSE 250 - consider trading (FTSE)     

cynic - 20 Oct 2007 12:12

rather than pick out individual stocks to trade, it can often be worthwhile to trade the indices themselves, especially in times of high volatility.

for those so inclined, i attach below charts for FTSE and FTSE 250, though one might equally be tempted to trade Dow or S&P, which is significantly broader in its coverage, or even NASDAQ

for ease of reading, i have attached 1 year and 3 month charts in each instance

hilary - 17 May 2010 11:04 - 5325 of 21973

Yes, currently 62% as at the end of March 2010.

Official ONS data

Camelot - 17 May 2010 11:33 - 5326 of 21973

for heavens sake hilary you are talking about debt

you have not read the post properly at all

The post is about annual expenditure

hilary - 17 May 2010 12:15 - 5327 of 21973

Camelot,

I'm not arguing about spending or debt, although I would point out to you that your OECD figures were based upon older data available before the budget. More up to date figures have become available within the last few weeks which show an increase in both public sector spending and debt. I have already said that I don't dispute your map showing public sector spending by region.

If you want to see the up to date precise amounts of public sector spending and debt, click here.

What I have been arguing about is the opening sentence of your post 5296 which clearly reads:

"Over 52 per cent of the UKs GDP is derived from public sector activity"

That, as I have already wasted plenty of time explaining, is a blatant inaccuracy. I don't know if they are your words or if they are a cut'n'paste from somewhere else, but they are wrong. How many times do I need to repeat myself?

Balerboy - 17 May 2010 12:18 - 5328 of 21973

10-1 on Hilary.....

skinny - 17 May 2010 12:19 - 5329 of 21973

:-)

hilary - 17 May 2010 12:22 - 5330 of 21973

Hey, I'd expect shorter odds than that.

:o)

Camelot - 17 May 2010 12:33 - 5331 of 21973

10-1 is 10-1 against

hilary - 17 May 2010 12:37 - 5332 of 21973

Does that mean you still maintaining your assertion that "Over 52 per cent of the UKs GDP is derived from public sector activity"?

cynic - 17 May 2010 12:51 - 5333 of 21973

short odds that not many of us care

Camelot - 17 May 2010 12:52 - 5334 of 21973

I expect the penny to drop in due course
and then he will cotton on

hilary - 17 May 2010 13:20 - 5335 of 21973

Cynic,

If you were to care a bit more about what some of the posters on this thread say, it might help improve your trading. Over the last few weeks I've watched you pour scorn on some respected and experienced traders who have gone out of their way to visit this thread in the hope it might help.

I've also watched you make some pretty flakey decisions in that time as well, so I suggest that you're not too old to learn..

Camelot,

My mother once told me that I shouldn't argue with an idiot as they invariably drag you down to their level and end up beating you with experience. If somebody else wishes to take up the reins and explain to you the error within your statement, they are more than welcome to.

Btw, I'm a she!

Balerboy - 17 May 2010 13:22 - 5336 of 21973

fiesty one at that.....:))

HARRYCAT - 17 May 2010 13:26 - 5337 of 21973

Bb, your 10-1 is looking very generous.

hilary - 17 May 2010 13:33 - 5338 of 21973

Btw, short futs at 5276 in last few minutes. Close above 5293 and I'll be out.

cynic - 17 May 2010 13:35 - 5339 of 21973

you obviously can't do much about your sex, but such is life
anyway, my trading statements go a considerably way to disprove your allegation, but no matter.

apart from that, i still see no reason why i should care at all about your jolly little altercation with camelot nor its basis and/or the somewhat arcane arguments relating to it.

i have the temerity to think i speak for most here in saying that gdp, however it is measured or distorted is of little interest ..... it's the direction of the markets that speak, and that is little influenced by this

hilary - 17 May 2010 13:36 - 5340 of 21973

Oh, a BSD huh?

cynic - 17 May 2010 13:38 - 5341 of 21973

??????? .... no idea but your mother should also have warned you about arguing with semites!

Balerboy - 17 May 2010 13:57 - 5342 of 21973

Don't rise to it hilery, you've spiked his ego now.....we will have to put up with him in his superior mood for the rest of the day.....hmmmmm

skinny - 17 May 2010 13:59 - 5343 of 21973

yeh - show us your legs :-)

dealerdear - 17 May 2010 14:01 - 5344 of 21973

yours are presumably a little on the thin side ...

;-)
Register now or login to post to this thread.