Mind you XP is pretty good as spotting new hardware and figuring out how to handle it.

H.

Snag is that I'm on 2000 on this office PC.

No, what made me feel that looking for the device maker's driver was the experience when I plugged a CDROM into my USB port. The machine recognised the new USB device, System Manager saw the drive, but Windows Explorer would not give it a drive letter.

What is this cdrom.inf file? Might this be the problem?

TP

It describes the device driver and how to install it. You can view. It is in text.

For Instance : -

[Version]
Signature="$WINDOWS NT$"
Class=CDROM
ClassGuid=
Provider=%MSFT%
LayoutFile=layout.inf
DriverVer=07/01/2001,5.1.2535.0

[ClassInstall32.NT]
AddReg=cdrom_class_addreg
Copyfiles=storprop_copyfiles

[cdrom_class_addreg]
HKR,,,,%CDClassName%
HKR,,EnumPropPages32,,"MmSys.Cpl,MediaPropPageProvider"
HKR,,Installer32,,"storprop.dll,DvdClassInstaller"
HKR,,SilentInstall,,1
HKR,,NoInstallClass,,1
HKR,,TroubleShooter-0,,"hcp://help/tshoot/tsdrive.htm"
HKR,,Icon,,"-51"
HKR,,DeviceType,0x10001,2 ; FILE_DEVICE_CDROM
HKR,,DeviceCharacteristics,0x10001,0x100 ; Use same security checks on relative opens

[cdaudio_copyfiles]
cdaudio.sys

Hi Guys I have had a lot of trouble with one PC. It was very very slow. CPU usage in task manager is at 100%. Culprit appears to be SPOOLSV.EXE, which is using 99%. Any ideas how I can fix it??

Bob

Bob - I'm sure the cavalry will be on this thread soon, but in the mean time -http://www.neuber.com/taskmanager/process/spoolsv.exe.html

Tks Skinny

Believe it or not I have fixed it myself by deleting all my printers in control panel.
CPU usage now looks normal. If I have trouble after reinstalling printer driver. "I'll be back"

Thanks Haystack,

Mr Google suggests it could be a registry problem:-

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/270008/

Snag is I have not the nerve to tinker with the registry as I know my CD drive, which I'd need for a 'recovery' is not working.

Frying pan to fire syndrome.

TP

Am I not right in thinking that this Upper Filter entry is a bug?



If so, any suggestions as to the safe way to get rid of it?

TP

Tp first couple of entries might be usefule - http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLD,GGLD:2004-12,GGLD:en&q=upperfilters

TP, have you ever used TweakUI by any chance? It has a facility to hide drives.

K.

No never.

Sk,

Yes, I've seen that. It was the reason I was looking at that entry.

Presumably I delete the whole of that UpperFilters line. Yes?

TP

If you uninstall the driven then those entries should go. Didn't you say earlier that you had done that already. What is the whole entry if present at all when you uninstall it?

H.

The entry that I photographed above remains the same when the drive is uninstalled.

Reading some more threads, such as this one that follows, it does seem that the Upper entry could have crept on to my system through looking at Ipod software.

http://www.file.net/process/gearaspiwdm.sys.html

Anyway I am pretty convinced that this GEARAspiWDM is the problem.

TP

TP

I'm not sure which registry entries are the problem, but if you want to play around with the registry, then select a key in the left hand pane, and click File - Export to save the key to a file. You can then delete or modify the key and restore it by opening your saved file.

Only use this method for minor registry settings, there are some parts of the registry where changes may immediately make your system unstable and it would not be possible to recover in that way. Idealy, you need to make a ful registry backup and be able to restore it from your boot CD.

BTW, will your system boot from your W2K setup CD?

Op,

"be able to restore it from your boot CD.

BTW, will your system boot from your W2K setup CD?"

No. This was going to be my ultimate problem. The machine will not see the CD drive so I was terrified that I might screw the operating system and not be able to recover with a CD.

Anyway, the long story has come to a happy end and having removed that Upperfilters entry in the registry I can now see my internal CD drive again.

Thanks to all of you who have patiently fed an assortment of ideas. It is annoying that my various bug tracing software progs could not spot the error in the registry.

Thank heavens for threads like this and the marvel of Google.

Back to do some real work now.

TP

TP

I'm glad that you have it sorted, but the registry mod would not have prevented it from booting from the CD so beware of something hardware related.

Thanks Op,

I understand. I also failed to explain that I had not got round to trying the Boot from a CD mode as I was paranoid about de-stabilising an otherwise working machine.

And I would not have attempted that registry change if today were not the day when our IT chappie is in the building.

But I will be on my guard as always for anything else that looks suspicious.

TP

thePublisher,
another speed test site you was looking for,
http://www.speedtest.net/

many using this one

steve

Thanks Steve,

Now to learn how to interpret the results.

TP

iam on 10meg ntl

i get

2/7/2007 5:15 PM GMT 9637 kb/s 488 kb/s 29 ms London < 50 mi

so i get 9.6 meg download which i think is good,the upload speed is important too,
just got orange bb for a backup and for lappy,only 5 for 8 meg but having major probs with them,only getting 2meg ish,the tech support most in india are crap,
just found out that i had been downgraded to 2 meg for some reason,

2/7/2007 5:32 PM GMT 1943 kb/s 202 kb/s 43 ms London ~ 200 mi

the above is for the orange 2 meg which is good if i was on the 2 meg speed but i should be on the 8 meg speed,

last oct 06 NTL was test 20 meg,i now have heared they are testing 50 meg,i was getting some good speed for a while but now back to 10 meg

10/27/2006 5:55 PM GMT 14720 kb/s 731 kb/s 24 ms London < 50 mi

10/27/2006 1:49 AM GMT 16682 kb/s 735 kb/s 18 ms London < 50 mi

10/26/2006 1:20 AM GMT 16567 kb/s 735 kb/s 17 ms London < 50 mi

so good things to come i think on NTL,they just take their time.




10/26/2006 1:20 AM GMT 16882 kb/s 734 kb/s 28 ms London < 50 mi