for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

blimey, paul!!! how many times can you filter someone?? ii, personally speaking , i am interested in the results of the trials, especially when they are successful. it's far easier to sell new technology when it actually works and so far seos technology is passing everything with flying colours. also, you can never have too much good news. as to your question about why the owners of biotec want cash and not shares, maybe the answer is as simple as... they want cash and not shares. sometimes things are that simple! i do agree with sequestor and others that we need more news about orders, though.
alan, why did you expect "to be shot down in flames "? it was a well reasoned post.
driver, got your email. cheers.

What's wrong with your shift key Bos?

niels, what do you mean?

I mean that proper punctuation would make your excellent postings easier to read. For example, "i" should be "I" and you should use a capital letter after a period. To illustrate, your question should have been: "Niels, what do you mean?"

NielsJensen
We aint AT: at! sChool here, WHERE DID YOU COME FROM ANY WAY!?

Easy now. Check this out:

http://www.foodproductiondaily.com/news/news-ng.asp?n=60495-stanelco-buys-biotec

I hold SEO and I like to read this thread. :)

NielsJensen
Then read it?

bos
New email sent.

NielsJensen
Welcome aboard have you seen this

RESEARCH PAGE:

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5042

Yes. I've looked carefully at SEO and got in at 9.75. This one will be as good as PDX. Sorry about the "punctuation bashing", but it really irritates me people can't take the time to use the language correctly. For example: What does "Then read it?" mean? I'm, clueless - maybe because i'm a Dane. :)

I hope MoneyAM have finally put InsiderImbecile out of our misery! This used to be such a good Fred! Still - it's like being famous - suddenly you get stalkers and people who want to put you down - "they ain't as good as they used to be when only me and my stuffed parrot were fans" Tosh, tosh tosh! SEO are a victim of there own success with this thread. after all who would be posting if they were going down the pan like certain people love to claim!

SEO are turning into a huge company! I am not sure about the latest acquisition but then I don't know do I!? However, I certainly trust SEO directors more than my nemesis of last year - YOOBleedia!

Sorry NielsJensen - "...victim of their own" and not "victim of there own"!!

--Shocking!

niels, i should explain. i am quite new to typing and am strictly a two-finger typist!! i have difficulty typing quickly when using the shift key as i spend far too long correcting mistakes. i understand that a lack of capitals may be irritating , but, i have to say that my punctuation is usually quite correct. congratulations on your wise investment and i look forward to your contribution to the thread.

bos - are you fealing orl rite - wot's orl this luvvy-duvvy peece and reconciliasian? dain-luvver!!!

sd, lol!! i am feeling fine. just being friendly , mr dog. anyway, how's your double-toungueing doing? is your fingering any better now that you've been practising? :)))))

NielsJenson - seem to recognise you and your posting style - have we met before ;-) ?

So now its four questions -

Were the Asda Salmon trials on consumer unfriendly Cut To Open welded lids as against the consumer friendly peelable lids - if this is true and was not stated it IMO ridicules the finding of longer shelf life et al. Plain obvious that a welded shut lid compared to peel lid is going to be sealed better.

Were the Asda Salman trials with new packaging which either had NEW on it or NEW for new instructions that you have to cut the pack to open it instead of peeling it ? With new packaging et al makes those results ands statement "spinny"

What kind of company release an RNS that they are buying a company - but says we do not know how to pay for it - issue more shares or go into debt - that should have been decided before informing everyone - or is the ulterior motive to do the shares issue and dilution before the LOSS reporting at Interims (will we now see Interim reporting put back and delayed as it should be later this month of June - watch this one carefully)

The owners of Biotec (very rich people) DO NOT WANT Stanelco shares as payment for the deposit or the full amount - they only want CASH. If the share price was going to the heavens - then why do these rich people want only CASH - perhaps they can see a good and bad deal in front of them - thats why they are rich - and interested in cash and not Stanelco shares perhaps ?

The dilution required to raise enough cash to pay for Biotec and to run its losses and service its debts (along with Stanelco's own losses) means they might try one last big shares issue to raise them enough money to see them through a few bad years - rush rush rush - one does wonder why.

Sorry Niels - I am dislexic so you will have to interpret my posts?

Baza

ii, go to the bathroom.

morning all. well all i can see on my watchlist is red and we haven't even opened yet!! hope it's not going to be one of those days!!