goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
MaxK
- 13 Jan 2015 12:09
- 54920 of 81564
You could say that about the labour party gf, full of toffs.
Fred1new
- 13 Jan 2015 12:10
- 54921 of 81564
GF,
Once again agreed!
goldfinger
- 13 Jan 2015 12:11
- 54922 of 81564
Very Small % of what the Tories have Im afraid Max.
goldfinger
- 13 Jan 2015 12:11
- 54923 of 81564
Exec........meetinvest where????????????
Shortie
- 13 Jan 2015 12:18
- 54924 of 81564
I'd say it about all parties! Most politicians aren't cut out for anything more than debating... Osborne should have been a journalist, no doubt he'd have shone far brighter if The Times had of accepted him... Just seams that all these politicians fall into politics once they fail at what they really wanted to do, its as though publicly running the country has become the career safety net of the privileged.
required field
- 13 Jan 2015 12:24
- 54925 of 81564
The biggest problem in the UK is that there is too much of a (legalised mafia) of a sort in politics, journalism and with royalty and with a few other privileged sections of the community ; they are all much too content to carry on running the country as it is with nobody stepping out of line and rocking the boat a little : the way we are governed suits everybody within this circle.
Fred1new
- 13 Jan 2015 12:36
- 54926 of 81564
Being ageist again..
Perhaps, MPs should be over 30 years old and ministers over 40 and PMs over 50.
Doesn't exclude bright younger researchers, advisers of younger age.
Wouldn't have considered writing the above 5 years ago, but the one thing "age" often seems to provide is a better perspective is of time and consequences.
What has been missing of recent governments is long term planning and acceptance of the need of preparation and time involved the intended goals, also think major policy changes should, when possible, be tested out by "trials" before being implemented across the board.
goldfinger
- 13 Jan 2015 12:36
- 54927 of 81564
That Tory Hancock on TV now is a top wanker.
doodlebug4
- 13 Jan 2015 12:46
- 54928 of 81564
Some posters on here today who seem to have big chips on their shoulders, or is it a case of - "I'm not happy with my lot in life" ?!
Fred1new
- 13 Jan 2015 12:51
- 54929 of 81564
GF.
I have similar thoughts about Hancock. He appears to be a true representative of the the present ruling tory bunch and I hope the wheel him more and more!
Preferably on a
8-)
MaxK
- 13 Jan 2015 12:56
- 54930 of 81564
doodlebug4
- 13 Jan 2015 13:04
- 54931 of 81564
Very good Max !
Shortie
- 13 Jan 2015 13:09
- 54932 of 81564
DB, not at all, the markets are slow and I'm bored with the polls and all the GE stuff so thought I'd generally stir it up against all politicians as I like to do...
Osborne was chosen for no other reason than Fed had posted a deficit comment prior to my post. "The Tories are to blame, nope, it's Labours fault".... "Only under a XYZ government will we achieve growth!!" It's all rubbish.... Shouldn't any sucessful economy contract as it evolves?
Shortie
- 13 Jan 2015 13:11
- 54933 of 81564
Good article Max.
doodlebug4
- 13 Jan 2015 13:22
- 54934 of 81564
Shortie, there was an interesting interview with someone from the Institute of Fiscal Studies on the Daily Politics programme today who basically said the current government had the correct policies in place to tackle the deficit, but that you could ask three of the best economists in the country what the right answer was - and you would get three different answers!
Shortie
- 13 Jan 2015 13:41
- 54935 of 81564
DB in order to get the right answer keep in mind that you must ask the right question... Is the deficit really a bad thing? Or just like most new businesses or even graduates for that matter they enter into the world with debt..! Would someone changing career or a business changing direction not be expected to incur debt as a result? You could argue therefore that a deficit is a product of evolution. Its not necessarily a bad thing depending on the overall bigger picture, that's what modern day politics lack and why politicians fail to inspire people to go and vote for them.
Fred1new
- 13 Jan 2015 13:50
- 54936 of 81564
Max and DB4,
Were you referring to :
or this:
cynic
- 13 Jan 2015 13:53
- 54937 of 81564
54938 - and isn't extraordinary that whichever side produces figures, they always totally contradict .... clearly it all depends on what version of the truth is wanted to be portrayed
required field
- 13 Jan 2015 13:55
- 54938 of 81564
Partly the problem is that if one country goes for tremendous growth with massive borrowing and artificially reducing unemployment : others follow, otherwise jealousy and envy sets in....with political parties it's the same....labour have always been a disaster for the country followed by years of hardship with the tories and then you have labour again crowing about how badly done everybody is with the cuts and so forth....and so it goes on the eternal right and left battling on how to run the UK.....badly most of the time...
required field
- 13 Jan 2015 14:01
- 54939 of 81564
I'm glad these delivery companies don't work for the NHS because the newborn would all be delivered in vans and not in hospitals as planned ....and not in time...