edited by moneyam

loadsadosh - If Sue Helen provides some evidence to support her claims, that appear to be in contradiction to the company's own announcements, then I will be happy to stop repeating my objections.

Do you have any credible views on the situation?

Rgds
dell

P.S. As you don't appear to have noticed Sue's regular repetition of the same posts(which are mostly nicked from other posters on ADVFN, anyhow), I'd imagine that you are not quite as perceptive as you seem to think......

See.....

Neutral (Medium term) - Oct 10, 2005 Analysis Explanation
Has broken through the ceiling of a falling trend channel. This indicates a slower falling rate initially, or the start of a more horizontal development. Has given positive signal from a inverse head and shoulders formation by a break up through the resistance at 0.22. Further rise to 1.42 or more is signaled. The stock has support at p 0.10 and resistance at p 0.35. The poor liquidity of the stock (traded 45% of the days, mean 0.04 mill per day) may weaken the analysis. The stock is overall assessed as technically neutral for the medium long term.

http://www.investtech.com/main/market.php?CompanyID=44102694&product=4

Any thoughts on the below:

"Has given positive signal from a inverse head and shoulders formation by a break up through the resistance at 0.22. Further rise to 1.42 or more is signaled".

More specifically on the below:

"Further rise to 1.42 or more is signaled".

Nice to see Investtech being positive like me on these........

RAMP ALERT RAMP ALERT

SUEHELEN BULLSHITS FOR A LIVING IMO >>> SUE ME IF I'M WRONG !

QTR thread is typical.

Regards

Don't know what Dil has written...someone else who keeps following me around like a stalker but the below views are of Investtech....why don't we go and bang their doors Dil and say where they got a rise to 1.42 pence or more is coming from:

Neutral (Medium term) - Oct 10, 2005 Analysis Explanation
Has broken through the ceiling of a falling trend channel. This indicates a slower falling rate initially, or the start of a more horizontal development. Has given positive signal from a inverse head and shoulders formation by a break up through the resistance at 0.22. Further rise to 1.42 or more is signaled. The stock has support at p 0.10 and resistance at p 0.35. The poor liquidity of the stock (traded 45% of the days, mean 0.04 mill per day) may weaken the analysis. The stock is overall assessed as technically neutral for the medium long term

'"Start of a more horizontal development" - had this happen for four trading days in a row last week'

Most proud owners of these wonderful tools are only too well aware that 'the start of a more horizontal development' can, almost without prior warning metamorphose firmly to the near-vertical mode.

Likewise, the tired and drooping share price performance of the past five years, followed by recent innactivity and rest could ensure that when this slumbering giant awakes, the resulting performance could exceed expectation with copious delight.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is that a coincidence then with Investtech saying a rise to 1.42 pence or more is signalled...and we're expecting positive news from DMR.

Check it out at:

http://www.investtech.com/main/market.php?CompanyID=44102694&product=4

You have to register first though.

If DMR's shareprice is indeed lifting in anticipation of a burst of activity, lets hope a target has been lined or there's no telling where the increased volume will start swinging the price

I suspect that after a new company is injected / aquired and a new price base formed, the directors will grant themselves an excessive amount of options at a seemingly 'fair' price....

...then as if by magic, once everyone has all but forgotten about the stone deposits, a discounted offer for the entire quarry assets appears and a huge lump of cash not stated on the books is retrieved.

Should be a good couple of weeks for DMR......chart + indicators pointing to a good rise...coinciding with some positive news from the company by end of October possibly.

Sue - Is that the best you can come up with, to ramp this?

I doubt very much if Investech's software is aware that DMR is now a shell with assets written down to a tiny fraction of their former value........

All IMHO, DYOR etc.

Rgds
dell

Whatever dell314...again was waiting for you to appear.

Why do people with no holdings always get such bees in their bonnets and express themselves so aggressively? It's a mystery to the simple-minded such as myself.

Level 2:

Couple of sells have come through which KBC and WINS have easily absorbed...no change on Level 2 with it still being at 2 v 2....just shows that news is on the horizon and a massive rally is coming.

I hope moneyam does not allow sue/op23 to destroy this bb,
glancing at that dreadful bb on advfn this person is posting some
disgusting comments on their dmr thread, where do these sick people come from ?

Hi Mackem....yep as u might have seen.

But that is what a nasty person dell314 is and how gets all the unsavoury posters to tarnish the thread when he doesn't feel his deramping is taking any effect.

Another 250K sell easily absorbed by KBC and WINS from an hour ago....and Level still at 2 v 2...no change all morning....looking good for positive news big time by end of next week.


Very encouraging to see KBC or WINS have taken in 875,000 in sells with no buys....

Check him out now:

dell314 - 17 Oct'05 - 11:38 - 952 of 953


Optimist - A lot of sells today.

It seems a little strange, when you are probably the only buyer in size of the last week or so.

Are you trying to pump this, whilst selling out?

It certainly wouldn't be the first time........

Rgds
dell

What a Sad Individual !!!

Level 2 closed at 2 v 2...no change all day....looking good for positive news by end of next week.

Very encouraging to see KBC or WINS have taken in 1,000,000 in sells with no buys....may be accumulating to sell stock at higher prices once they ready to let these go.

Interesting Chart:

Level 2 is still the same as yesterday i.e. stable at 2 v 2.