MoneyAM have now launched Simply Chart - a new desktop charting package. With thanks to all the beta testers who have been very quietly helping us develop this. To try it yourself click on the FREE DEMO link below.

Home Features Analytics Download / Free Demo FREE Live Share prices Buy Contact Help Simply Chart, as the name suggests, is a fast and easy to use end of day desktop charting package. Compile your own lists or use the standard lists of over 3000 stocks and indices (UK). Powerful customisable analytics with over 80 overlays and indicators PLUS chart pattern scanning tools PLUS powerful drawing tools make this a 'must have' package. Up to 10 years historic data for 3000+ shares/indices (UK) Create your own watchlists Line, Candle and Bar charts (log or linear) Customisable display schemes 80+ customisable analytics Scan charts for patterns or indicators Fully functional drawing toolbox Fast end of day data updater Free product updates FREE live share prices FREE access to MoneyAM's Premier web service (worth 55). LIVE share prices, LIVE market news, fundamentals and research zone powered by Thomsons, bulletin boards and much much more! About usTerms and Conditions SimplyChart 2006 a MoneyAM product

does it work with a mac

no

Ian,

Any luck on MIKE?

What do you think, DocProc, about having TWO usernames on a single financial site?

The mind boggles, ExecLine.

Are we having what is commonly called a 'Four windows open at the same time conversation", ExecLine?

Apparently not.

Back to the drawing board.

Hmmm?

I tried a little experiment withe four postings done with two using an 'ExecLine' Log In and two logged in using 'DocProc' Log In, all four windows open on my machine at the same time.

If you have two username identities on here, it would seem you have to 'Log In' (A) and 'Log Out' (A) and then 'Log In' (B) once again to make a posting with a change of your username identity.

MoneyAM does link the two usernames together and will only allow one username to be used at a time. It doesn't semm as though it is posssible to have a 'conversation' with yourself unless you log in and out and in and out, etc, etc.

I do think this is a bit 'wierd' and I don't think it is entirely satisfactory. Albeit, it will make the MoneyAM subscriber figures look great. Ah well.

Why would you want to be logged in under two users names and have a conversation with yourself anyway? Thought that was reserved was the loonies over on ADVFN.

Well, there are going to be users over here with two usernames now for sure.

Probably there always were. Probably, because users post under a nickname, rather than with a real name, it isn't preventable.

Isaacs, I don't and wouldn't want to do as you suggest and post as a loonie. Nevertheless, I do have strong curiosity and merely wanted to test things out for myself.

I do think you have to watch out for 'what and how' people post on a financial site bulletin board and do your own research into things. There are loonies on the one hand and there are crafty people with strong hidden agendas on the other.

Oh, and please 'lighten up' a bit. Your post reads a little bit like a personal attack. I don't think my stuff deserves it. It was meant to be somewhat educational as well as experimental. :-)

Ian

Anything on the MIKE thing. Someone must know???

Thanks
Rob

Sorry wasn't meant to be a personal attack and reading it again not sure it sounds like one so perhaps it is you that needs to lighten up ;-)

Anyway just couldn't see why you were so concerned about not being able to be logged in with both names. If there must be two user names (which presumably is the only way to make things work) then surely that is preferable.

Robb,

Please accept my apologies, I must confess it slipped my mind - I will try to find out and get back to you as soon as possible,

Ian

ok Ian, no worries, thanks

Robb Its a secret formulae, not; It was a test to see if we could replicate the Bollinger Optimised Synergy System using a Price/Close indicator together with a combined Price/Volume indicator.

here is the formulae

TYP:=(HIGH+LOW+CLOSE)/3;
LL:=LLV(LOW,N);
HH:=HHV(HIGH,N);
WR:TYP+(TYP-LL);
MR:TYP+(HH-LL);
SR:2*HH-LL;
WS:TYP-(HH-TYP);
MS:TYP-(HH-LL);
SS:2*LL-HH

Looks pretty!

Ha, bloody hell, thats given me some homework, wish I hadn't asked :-)

Thanks.
Rob

.

Isaacs & DocProc, having read both of your posts I don't think anyone had any intended malice in mind, and I read both peoples posts as interesting comments on the system that's in place.

I do think it's silly that you can't keep the same username if you could verify your existing MAM username in some way before getting your Simply Chart username.

I have an annual Sharescope sub so won't be jumping just yet. Just one question from me. I run two machines, laptop at work then desktop at home. Sharescope will now allow you to have one copy on each machine as long as one is just a backup of the other. Could I do this with Simply Chart?

"loonies on the one hand and there are crafty people with strong hidden agendas on the other."
Im Neutral on this.Im Both.
You should see my agenda! ;-)))

Sharescope's full list (stocks plus trusts plus warrants plus indices etc) total 11,700 items. Simplychart says "over 3000" which is little more than a quarter of what Sharescope cover. I know there is scope to weed out some dead wood among Sharescopes total list, but it sounds like Simplychart must have left out a lot of good stuff too. Anyone found problems with this? (Presumably someone at Sharescope will tell if I ask ;o)

Sort of "sharescope lite" ?

Sharescope has this month been apologising for pricing errors in its Hemscott feed (Hemscott's fault). What info/data feeds does Simplycharts rely on?