Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Maybe there is some suspicion that it was an assisted death.

Stop acting as an idiot and read my post again.

'

That sounds like a logical conclusion Haystack.

doodlebug4 - 26 Jan 2015 16:27 - 55844 of 55852

And why retweet something like that which was originally posted three days ago.......ends


Well please someone tell the clown doodlebug the news as been on SKY ITV and BBC... ALL AFTERNOON.

MP Tom Watson as turned up new evidence and is pointing the figure at Leon Britain.

Again the man is not engaging his brain, then again thats why Fred calls him doodlebug 3 1/2 and not 4.

Part of his anatomy is missing. Yes youve guessed right.

Little wonder he picks dog breakfasts like FLYB.

I think your spot on Hays.

I will have to stop agreeing with you.

You are just attempting to stir it up about Leon Brittan because he was a Conservative, if he was Labour you wouldn't be bothering to mention it. It is disgraceful the way he has been hounded with various allegations.

That Labour MP Tom Watson is an utter creep.

there was certainly a very interesting and long article in ST about LB
conclusion was that he was being badly and most unfairly smeared

You are just saying that because..........blah blah...........if he was "Con" servative you wouldn't be bothering to mention it. It is disgraceful the way he has been hounded with various allegations.

What happened to the - innocent until proven guilty - ideology?

Oh for christ sake Alf stop quoting Murdoch propaganda rags like the ST, The paper used to be a very well respected broadsheet for many years until Murdoch got hold of it but that ceased years ago.

You can't actually quote the ST in full online anyway unless you pay for the priviledge !

stan - perhaps you'ld like to pop round to your library and read the article for yourself, for i'm sure they'll have a copy ... you'll then be able to give a balanced view

Murdoch is a very clever businessman, but the lefties don't like that sort of thing

55862 continued ...... go to http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/uk_news/National/article1511215.ece
where you can read the opening paras for free, though there was a great deal more than that

Don't be soppy Alf it's a Murdoch propaganda rag much like the rest of his titles.

Murdoch is nothing more then a right wing propagandist among other things.

New evidence ‘clears’ Brittan over MP’s paedophile dossier

False assertions of a cover-up in Westminster blighted the former home secretary’s last months, writes James Gillespie

EVIDENCE has emerged that Leon Brittan, the former home secretary, who died of cancer last week, was unjustly accused of covering up child sex-abuse allegations.

Geoffrey Dickens, the MP who submitted the allegations to Brittan, praised him for “splendid support” and thanked the Home Office for its work in combating paedophilia, the evidence shows.

Brittan’s final months were overshadowed by the claims of some MPs and campaigners that Dickens handed in a “dossier” of high-ranking Westminster figures who were involved in child sex abuse while Brittan was home secretary and that the documents were “lost” as part of a cover-up.

An examination of a report by Peter Wanless, chief executive of the NSPCC, into the Home Office’s handling of the matter, as well as two internal inquiries conducted by an HMRC investigator and Dickens's speeches in the Commons, paints a different picture of what happened .......

==============

read the article in full and then you can comment from knowledge

It's a bent publication like most of the others that Murdoch owns.