Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

fine stan, but how about addressing the issues i raised ...... if you are betting that labour will have an outright majority, then say so

In short the Conservative mandate for the GE..

shortie - and that for labour is what? .... i assume none of the other parties warrant any mention at all

If you are talking about removing freedoms then look at the Blair government. By the way none of the details below involved repealing any anti union laws brought in by Thatcher.

The Blair years: new law passed every three hours
Last updated at 08:12 04 June 2007


In his ten years as Prime Minister, Tony Blair has introduced a new law every three-and-a- quarter hours, new research reveals.

Since 1997, an average of 2,685 laws have been passed every year - a 22 per cent rise on the previous decade.

They have covered subjects ranging from the importing of bed linen to the evaluation of statistics on labour costs.

The figure does not include European Union laws which also affect Britain - last year, 2,100 of those were passed, bringing the total to 4,785 or 13 every day, according to legal publishers Sweet & Maxwell.

Of the laws, 98 per cent were brought in by statutory instruments, rather than Acts of Parliament. The procedure allows less time for debate by MPs than the tabling of a Bill.

The statutes themselves have become longer, with five Acts passed last year taking more than 100 pages to explain, three of them more than 200, another above 300, another above 500 and one more than 700 pages long.

Shadow Cabinet Office minister Oliver Heald said: "Tony Blair and Gordon Brown think the answer to everything is to make a new law.

"But, after creating thousands of new laws, violent crime has doubled."

A spokesman for the Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, said: "Politicians often equate legislation with action.

Oh the other parties are just as hideous, I just like taking the piss out of Cameron the most. He has to be the most uninspiring, waffle talking, back tracking, lying prime minister that this country has ever had. I thought Blair topped it but Cameron wins the prize in my book... I wouldn't trust the man with a mop and bucket!

The Conservative philosophy is to increase freedom and reduce the nanny state that is so prevalent under Labour.

fred before the alt"" bit in the code for that picture of Farage can you insert

width="200" height="150"

please???

I love this one!! So true..

Could you ever trust him again!?!

Can you really take this one-man band seriously???

permission granted shortie :-)

one assumes that is the mail as opposed to the mirror or socialist worker, so must be true
that said, one could and should add, "and why on earth should he not?"

Tell us Alf, Has your PT told you when your training is going to end yet?

not his call of course
i hope that now i have committed (not have been!), that i'll maintain it for a many more years

Shortie,

Was allowed out earlier this morning, but wanted to make sure Max knew what he was wishing for before I went!

=========

What do you mean not his call? he's the trainer not you.

By Alan Cochrane
6:30AM GMT 28 Jan 2015
The Scottish Labour leader needs to decide if he is a Blairite reformer or an old-school left-winger

Either the polls have gone mad or the voters have. The sentiment, widely felt north of the border, is prompted by some incredible surveys of voter opinion – the latest being the poll of polls, conducted by Sky News, which suggested that as things stand the SNP is on course to win 53 seats at the general election on May 7.

If accurate it means that the nationalists’ tally would increase almost ninefold from the six they won in 2010 with the remaining six Scottish seats being shared amongst Labour (41 last time), Liberal Democrats (11) and the Conservatives (one). Fantastical? It seems so, but the very prospect is scaring the living daylights out of what used to be called the ‘mainstream’ political parties at Westminster.

None more so than Labour, because if what the polls suggest comes to pass then a big Nat surge in Scotland might well deprive Ed Miliband of his chances of an overall majority at Westminster and then, irony of ironies, he’d then be faced with the prospect of having to do a deal with an Alex Salmond-dominated phalanx of SNP MPs. The Nats are currently toying with Mr Miliband – saying they won’t form a coalition government with him but telling him that they’re open to a bit of horse-trading: they’ll allow him to be Prime Minister but will only let him keep 10 Downing Street if he agrees to their demands.


Like a rabbit caught in the headlights, the Labour leader seems transfixed by the Nats' demands. He can’t bring himself to positively rule out any deals with the SNP-- in sharp contrast to Ed Balls, the Shadow Chancellor, who has done just that.

Apart from progress to their ultimate objective of independence – for which the SNP is perfectly happy to hold Westminster to ransom for as long as it takes - the other ‘red line’ demand from First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is the removal of Trident from Scotland. But it is a demand that a Labour government simply cannot concede.

Labour supports the British nuclear deterrent and even if a costly replacement for Trident was shelved and something cheaper – like a Cruise-based system – was decided upon, the missiles would still be submarine-launched. And as all of the Royal Navy’s submarines are due to be based on the Clyde within five years, Britain’s independent deterrent would still be situated in Scotland – a fact that the SNP would, presumably, oppose.

So what’s Labour to do? Clearly, it’s best option would be to halt that Nat tide and hang onto all those Westminster seats and, thus, help Mr Miliband get that overall majority that the polls are currently saying is beyond his reach. Charged with that uphill task since the beginning of December is Jim Murphy, one of the heroes of the successful defeat of the Nats in the referendum.

Whether he goes from champ to chump is now Scotland’s hottest political topic. Mr Murphy is a talented politician – even his Nat opponents concede that - but his main problem at present appears to be that he can’t make up his mind what manner of politician he is.

Tagged from the start as an avowed Blairite, he’s been treated as such by those once termed the Brownies in Labour’s ranks and it was unfortunate for Jim that the ‘wrong’ brother won the Labour leadership. The victory for Ed quickly saw Mr Murphy demoted from the defence portfolio to that of international development in the Shadow Cabinet.

Although he’s denied the Blairite label, he didn’t help his cause by appointing John McTernan, his former special advisor and also Tony Blair’s one-time political secretary, as his chief of staff when he assumed the Scottish leadership.

But in an attempt both to bury that image and also to recapture those Labour voters who voted Yes against their party in the referendum and who now appear to have deserted it in droves, Mr Murphy is brandishing his left-wing credentials.

He deliberately picked a fight with Tories like Boris Johnson by saying that he’d use the mansion tax in London to pay for Scottish nurses. He tried to outbid the SNP by saying he’d ban fracking until all the environmental issues connected with it were resolved. He claimed the SNP’s council tax freeze and new property taxes as benefitting the better off and he pledged that a future Labour-controlled Scottish government would re-nationalise the country’s rail services.

Bizarrely, at least in light of his sterling service for the No campaign last year, he assured those Labour supporters in West Central Scotland, who associate the term with the sectarian politics of Northern Ireland, by insisting he wasn’t a "Unionist".

Whilst all of this will be seen as pure political posturing to regain that traditional Labour vote, it’s doing nothing for those other Unionists – Tories and Lib Dems – who may be prepared to vote tactically for Labour to stop the Nats. “ Jim Murphy used to say that you can’t win from the Left. But that’s where he is just now and he won’t get many Centre-Right votes from there,” said one senior Tory yesterday.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that he won’t tell us if he’s standing for election in his Renfrewshire seat in May’s general election.

All of which leads to one obvious question: Will the real Jim Murphy please stand up?

Stan,

I breathed a sigh of relief for a moment, or two, when I read Manuel's post.

I thought he had posted that he had been committed.

Disappointment soon set in again, on rereading.