cashcaptain
- 09 May 2007 13:23
ANYONE KNOW WHY THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND IS SHOWING A SHARE PRICE AROUND THE 6.59 MARK WHEN IT WAS 18.00 OR SO THE OTHER WEEK OR AM I GOING STRANGE?????????????
maestro
- 14 Jan 2009 16:44
- 564 of 676
trouble is they'll probably all go long instead and catch every body out
mitzy
- 15 Jan 2009 20:15
- 565 of 676
Wont be long now...!
hangon
- 16 Jan 2009 16:51
- 566 of 676
- - - - - - - - - - BANKS today - - - - - - (DYOR) - - -
BARC =minus25% - - - - 98p
LLOY = minus 5% - - - - - 98p ( but was positive most of the day).
RBS = minus 13% - - - - 34p
CTT = +8% - - - - - 19p
Added Cattles. . . (OK not a "real Bank" - but someone might say: Neither are the others!-Ho-Ho)
BARC was wrong%, but the price is correct - AND who would have thought it, eh?
Sorry abt. errors etc. skinny,
-unfortunately I haven't worked out how to collect the necessary data and post in one go....it would be nice if we could have a BANK thread, so we might watch/compare...otherwise this switching "Quote" is somewhat long-winded. If it was a floating "Compose" then I could switch between Stocks.....has no-one suggested this? The new-style Winners/losers also has a "sector" option, unfortunately they are still either Win/Lose so you can't get a one-stop "picture.
+I understood BARC did a deal with the MiddleEast at 12%-ish - possible to fund Barclaycard, where the intrterest-rate is well into the 20's - - - so they will shut-down any traditional low-rate loans ( Whoops!) and try to switch customers into plastic ( Yikes!)....they alone of the Big-Banks did not take Government money - - - but maybe now they can't resist.... anyone?
[ IMHO, Banking could get very Nasty for idiot Customers - - - - and it's none too good for prudent Savers - whose income has been halved.(Bah Bah, Humbug!).]
skinny
- 16 Jan 2009 16:55
- 567 of 676
LLoy closed @98.4 -4.9%
edit - your edit quicker than mine!
edit BARC was -24.9%
mitzy
- 16 Jan 2009 17:26
- 568 of 676
7p is my target.
tomasz
- 16 Jan 2009 19:04
- 569 of 676
wow that was quiet something
lucky those went short at the time
hangon
- 16 Jan 2009 21:47
- 570 of 676
7p mitzy - is that the value of BARC you are saying? OK they may have some toxic debts, but these can't be all that big (can they?)- and BARC did secure a loan of-sorts from the middle-east at 14% - so they have enough to tick-over OR do you consider this is nonsense....e.g. that when "bust" the only value is the office furniture and building leases, etc? (see*).
I will agree that the departure of a Dir is unsettling - esp at this rather dangerous time (UK-restoration of Shorting).
+Can you provide further insight, - pse?
.
.
* Many consider HBOS was broke ( well damn close) - and that was taken-over by LLOY at a reasonably large price, presumably for its network, underlying Mortgages and infrastructure. Their problem was lack of cash, but this was papered-over/ smoothed-out by UK Gov ( =uk Taxpayers!). They have some redeeming cash from savers, but these are relatively small compared with the HBOS "loan-book" hence the difficulty when no-one will lend, etc.
robertalexander
- 17 Jan 2009 09:02
- 571 of 676
anyone think that shorting the banks will be banned again real soon?
Else i can foresee the Govt having to step in and (part/whole)nationalise them.
If shorting banned then maybe a chance for a quick[high risk imho] profit from those having to close their positions.
halifax
- 17 Jan 2009 13:00
- 572 of 676
The only bank Gordon Brown cannot nationalise is Barclays as so far they have not taken any taxpayers money. Latest statement from Barclays seems to contradict the markets perception of the value of their business.
robertalexander
- 17 Jan 2009 19:40
- 573 of 676
possibly good for a bounce then? albeit high risk
mitzy
- 17 Jan 2009 20:45
- 574 of 676
I predicted 20/30p for RBS in October but I think 7p would be true figure now and 60p for Barclays.
tomasz
- 18 Jan 2009 01:16
- 575 of 676
don't you scare me mitzy with that 7p
mitzy
- 18 Jan 2009 09:21
- 576 of 676
Its scary stuff tomasz one broker said 1p last week, JPM said 9p and another 18p in November.. take your pick.
700202
- 18 Jan 2009 12:30
- 577 of 676
AN RBS UPGRADE Friday from Dresdner K from HOLD to BUY
mitzy
- 18 Jan 2009 19:54
- 578 of 676
Latest:
RBS to convert 5bill of preference shares held by the government to Ordinary shares resulting in a 70% stake.
So we now have a bank 70% owned by the taxpayer where does this leave the shareholder..?
700202
- 18 Jan 2009 20:35
- 579 of 676
Well the way I see it ,the bank does not have to pay the 12% interest on the 5
billion pref shares,so this would free up and save the bank money,I would consider this good news
dealerdear
- 18 Jan 2009 20:53
- 580 of 676
Good question.
Earlier today, reports were saying RBS was going to be nationalised with the 70% stake. Surely nationalisation means 100% and delisting. Over the last couple of hours, reports appear to have backtracked from this position.
To be frank I don't understand the rules well enough and many attempts to have meaningful dialogue on here have fallen foul on ill informed self-opinionated crap. Perhaps I expect too much but you would have thought that on a share trading site there would be people around who knew what they were talking about and were willing to discuss these issues. It appears not. Most of the genuine and informed investors have left along time ago. Tis no wonder moneyam struggles to resolve it's many diificulties when subsciptions must be at an all time low.
Yes I am a shareholder and yes I fear that we are about to be cleaned out.
maggiebt4
- 18 Jan 2009 21:04
- 581 of 676
DD On my understanding of what happened to the Anglo Irish bank Govt nationalised it, it was delisted and shareholders will get zilch. So yes you are right.IMO
700202
- 18 Jan 2009 21:16
- 582 of 676
dealerdear I am a holder to of 50k ,the Telegraph reported it might be nationalised,but heh the dailys do like a good headline.
Are you saying that holders of pref shares do not receive interest,if you consider everyone on this site is talking crap why bother posting.
mitzy
- 18 Jan 2009 21:17
- 583 of 676
Rumours of full nationalisation within months I hear which would be logical I guess shareholders will recieve little in the way of compensation as taxpayers always come first.