markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 09:16
- 5668 of 6492
Not yet...but testing is on going.....give them a chance....
gibby
- 02 Dec 2010 09:17
- 5669 of 6492
look to sell / buy back - only if in profit of course
Balerboy
- 02 Dec 2010 09:17
- 5670 of 6492
So can anyone put a time table on here on what happens next and how long??
gibby
- 02 Dec 2010 09:17
- 5671 of 6492
rf buy low mate - good news commercially watch it go
robstuff
- 02 Dec 2010 09:37
- 5672 of 6492
wouldn't sell below 2 now they struck oil and 2 more to drill before RKH gets rig, enormous upside I would think next few weeks
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 10:00
- 5673 of 6492
Bought a lot more this morning....
robstuff
- 02 Dec 2010 10:12
- 5674 of 6492
me too, more news to come
robstuff
- 02 Dec 2010 10:19
- 5676 of 6492
did you get up late marky? snowed in so nothing else to do but watch this unfold, expect great things - always have from DES. I dont know why but always thought DES has more potential than the other Faulkoils and if this discovery similar to RKHs price to double to be worth same i.e RKH current valuation 900m, DES has the choice areas in my opinion, wouldnt surprise me to see 2 tomorrow. What do you think?
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 10:23
- 5677 of 6492
Comment from Fox Davies :
Desire Petroleum (LON:DES) (BUY, 2.00) (DES, 152.75p, %u25B2 (44.34%)) announced that the 14/15-2 Rachel North well has reached a total depth of 3052m and that preliminary data collected indicate that this well is an oil discovery. The company has run an initial suite of wireline logs and this together with the drilling data indicate that the well encountered a 349m gross interval from 2621-2970m of sands and shales with hydrocarbons, of which 57m is net pay in multiple zones. The thickest zone is 8m thick with an average porosity of 20%. Other zones are thinly bedded and lower porosity but require further analysis from additional wireline logs to establish reservoir potential. Desire now intends to complete the wireline logging and wireline sampling programme to obtain more information on the reservoir quality, the hydrocarbon saturations and the fluid type to assess the significance of this discovery. Further information will be released in due course.
Comment: Have Desire and Rockhopper cracked the North Falkland Basin? Possibly, as Rachel confirms one of the play concepts unravelled by the Sea Lion discovery. It remains to be seen though whether reservoir development and quality are sufficient for Rachel to be commercial. Hence this is obviously very good news but still early days.
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 10:31
- 5678 of 6492
Even if this well is not commercial....it probably will not matter....as appraisal wells close by will be needed....this is a tremendous success for both DES and RKH....no problem now about fund raising and this area around Sealion and Rachel will see production rigs ...I'm convinced at that...
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 10:42
- 5679 of 6492
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-02/desire-petroleum-surges-after-discovering-oil-at-rachel-well-in-falklands.html
.......Desires Rachel discovery may yield about 50 million barrels of recoverable oil, which would make it borderline commercial, Panmure Gordons Hitchens. Its not a slam-dunk like weve seen with Rockhopper......
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 10:45
- 5681 of 6492
marky, Sea Lion being big will make a small 50 million find commercial nearby as they can tie in to Sea Lion.
Thats where the hope lies with Rachel, DES need it to be 50 MMBO in recoverable size.
gibby
- 02 Dec 2010 10:49
- 5682 of 6492
lol not today
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 10:50
- 5684 of 6492
There is also the fact that as Sealion goes ahead, perhps the proximity of Rachel 2 might help....and therefore the minimum amout of barrels for it to be commercial (cost wise) is reduced.....
Balerboy
- 02 Dec 2010 11:32
- 5686 of 6492
Thanks marky, didn't realise it might be so soon.
cielo
- 02 Dec 2010 11:42
- 5687 of 6492
Proselenes
RAMPER that is you, and the reason is you are posting the same, ( for some rubbish, copy and paste ) on so many different "webs" >>> moneyam, iii, advfn, LSE, etc
Do not twist things when you are loosing the argument >>>>
Below you said it was a dodgy source and now you are trying to say is a good source, not everybody is so STUPID like you
Proselenes - 01 Dec 2010 08:26 - 5617 of 5684
Its not, when you refer to a dodgy source you call it a "sauce".......
Proselenes - 30 Nov 2010 09:28 - 5572 of 5601
All "sauces" are now saying oil strike.