markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
robstuff
- 02 Dec 2010 10:12
- 5674 of 6492
me too, more news to come
robstuff
- 02 Dec 2010 10:19
- 5676 of 6492
did you get up late marky? snowed in so nothing else to do but watch this unfold, expect great things - always have from DES. I dont know why but always thought DES has more potential than the other Faulkoils and if this discovery similar to RKHs price to double to be worth same i.e RKH current valuation 900m, DES has the choice areas in my opinion, wouldnt surprise me to see 2 tomorrow. What do you think?
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 10:23
- 5677 of 6492
Comment from Fox Davies :
Desire Petroleum (LON:DES) (BUY, 2.00) (DES, 152.75p, %u25B2 (44.34%)) announced that the 14/15-2 Rachel North well has reached a total depth of 3052m and that preliminary data collected indicate that this well is an oil discovery. The company has run an initial suite of wireline logs and this together with the drilling data indicate that the well encountered a 349m gross interval from 2621-2970m of sands and shales with hydrocarbons, of which 57m is net pay in multiple zones. The thickest zone is 8m thick with an average porosity of 20%. Other zones are thinly bedded and lower porosity but require further analysis from additional wireline logs to establish reservoir potential. Desire now intends to complete the wireline logging and wireline sampling programme to obtain more information on the reservoir quality, the hydrocarbon saturations and the fluid type to assess the significance of this discovery. Further information will be released in due course.
Comment: Have Desire and Rockhopper cracked the North Falkland Basin? Possibly, as Rachel confirms one of the play concepts unravelled by the Sea Lion discovery. It remains to be seen though whether reservoir development and quality are sufficient for Rachel to be commercial. Hence this is obviously very good news but still early days.
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 10:31
- 5678 of 6492
Even if this well is not commercial....it probably will not matter....as appraisal wells close by will be needed....this is a tremendous success for both DES and RKH....no problem now about fund raising and this area around Sealion and Rachel will see production rigs ...I'm convinced at that...
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 10:42
- 5679 of 6492
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-02/desire-petroleum-surges-after-discovering-oil-at-rachel-well-in-falklands.html
.......Desires Rachel discovery may yield about 50 million barrels of recoverable oil, which would make it borderline commercial, Panmure Gordons Hitchens. Its not a slam-dunk like weve seen with Rockhopper......
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 10:45
- 5681 of 6492
marky, Sea Lion being big will make a small 50 million find commercial nearby as they can tie in to Sea Lion.
Thats where the hope lies with Rachel, DES need it to be 50 MMBO in recoverable size.
gibby
- 02 Dec 2010 10:49
- 5682 of 6492
lol not today
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 10:50
- 5684 of 6492
There is also the fact that as Sealion goes ahead, perhps the proximity of Rachel 2 might help....and therefore the minimum amout of barrels for it to be commercial (cost wise) is reduced.....
Balerboy
- 02 Dec 2010 11:32
- 5686 of 6492
Thanks marky, didn't realise it might be so soon.
cielo
- 02 Dec 2010 11:42
- 5687 of 6492
Proselenes
RAMPER that is you, and the reason is you are posting the same, ( for some rubbish, copy and paste ) on so many different "webs" >>> moneyam, iii, advfn, LSE, etc
Do not twist things when you are loosing the argument >>>>
Below you said it was a dodgy source and now you are trying to say is a good source, not everybody is so STUPID like you
Proselenes - 01 Dec 2010 08:26 - 5617 of 5684
Its not, when you refer to a dodgy source you call it a "sauce".......
Proselenes - 30 Nov 2010 09:28 - 5572 of 5601
All "sauces" are now saying oil strike.
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 11:46
- 5688 of 6492
cielo.....
AND WHAT WAS IT ?????
WAS IT AN OIL STRIKE ??????????????
LOL
MY SAUCES CONFIRMED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Proselenes
- 02 Dec 2010 11:52
- 5689 of 6492
And now you have proven yourself to be a scumbag cielo, I shall add you to my squelched posters list.
So I never have to see the rubbish you post ever again :) Bye Bye loser......
Edit : And there you are now with the others
Users you currently have squelched
hilary
Master RSI
zscrooge
Balerboy
ptholden
ravey davy gravy
cielo
Balerboy
- 02 Dec 2010 11:53
- 5690 of 6492
Girls...................please scratch your eye's out else where.
HARRYCAT
- 02 Dec 2010 12:20
- 5691 of 6492
Evolution's summary so far:
"Analysts at Evolution commented:" This appears to be a better quality reservoir than in the original Rachel well (reservoir quality is the main issue in the North Falklands Basin (NFB)) and should be capable of a decent flow rate.
"Wireline logging is to continue over the next 10 days (to establish reservoir quality, oil saturation and fluid sampling to get an indication of API) but no flow test is planned at this stage - so the non-believers will continue to be sceptical.
"However, we believe that the initial indications are good and a second discovery derisks the eastern flank of the NFB with the potential to become an important oil province, with positive implications for Desire (DES), Rockhopper (RKH) and Argos (ARG)."
required field
- 02 Dec 2010 12:25
- 5692 of 6492
Good for north of 150p again and might hold....
HARRYCAT
- 02 Dec 2010 12:34
- 5693 of 6492
And the Goldman Sachs take on things:
"Analysis
The discovery of oil is a positive in our view, and the presence of 20% porosity reservoir is also encouraging for both this prospect and the potential for the wider basin as a whole. We note, however, that the thickest section was 8 metres and that porosity was lower outside this section, which may mean additional work is required before the company is able to comment on commerciality or volumes. We currently value the Rachel prospect at 9p per share for Desire (which has a 92.5% stake), and 3p per share for Rockhopper (7.5% stake). A full de-risking of this prospect would result in a 97% uplift to our valuation of Desire and 4% for Rockhopper, based on pre drill estimates, but we note that it is too early for a full de-risking at this early stage. We await further details from the company to assess what level of de-risking should take place at this point.
Implications.
We would view the discovery of oil in 20% porosity reservoir as a positive, but note that much of the net pay was in thinly bedded, lower porosity sands which may limit some of the upside today. We believe the result will focus attention on the potential of the north Falkland Basin which we believe will be positive for both Desire and Rockhopper. Our price target is under review."