Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 12:24 - 5686 of 27111

EWRobson - I do not normally reply to such stupid questions - but as you insist down this route instead of discussing whats gone wrong - let me state once and for all I am not funded by anyone - paid by anyone - for my posts - if you wish to keep trying to BASH me - fine - better to stick to the company as they seem to be in trouble and having problems.

You keep posting the "forward looking comments" with wording that means NOTHING - "could" "perhaps" "maybe" "expected" "hope" and that kind of wording which gives positive impression that serves no purpose as it is hypothetical - Tony Ruane said "could", SEO keep saying "expect" "hope for".

Perhaps you would like to read the earlier RNS about the Asda deal which clearly states " Asda suppliers will convert where practical" - but no definition of what is practical - it could mean in fact every one of the suppliers will say "not practical for me - sorry"

The whole feed of RNS and news has had "spin" wording - no definition - no "concrete" statements - plenty of rope for the PIs to hang themselves with by misunderstanding the real meaning.

The price to Asda suppliers is not fixed and has not been divulged yet - maybe we can see it at interims ???

EWRobson - 10 Jun 2005 12:24 - 5687 of 27111

What is also clear, jimmy, is that ii ignores any posts which refute his position. He has chosen not to respond to the challenge that he is funded by (or acting on behalf of) BPRG. They are reduced to a bit player anyway so I suspect ii is sick in the pit of his stomach as well as spewing his garbage all over this thread.

Eric

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 12:28 - 5688 of 27111

EWR - read the post above your last one.

paulmasterson1 - 10 Jun 2005 12:30 - 5689 of 27111



paulmasterson1 - 09 Jun'05 - 16:49 - 5630 of 5687 edit

insiderinsidetheloonybin, still bashing Stanelco on all BB's available, still using other aliases to back up your own ridiculously negative stance on Stanelco, still posting your imaginations diahhrea all over the place, still losing money by not investing in Stanelco, still losing money by working for and investing(LOL !) in BPRG, still posting even though everyone has left you on your own on ADVFN, and everyone else, on every other board is either filtering you, or laughing at you.

You are sad, very very sad.

PM

superrod - 10 Jun 2005 12:31 - 5690 of 27111

ii
if GENUINE LARGE SAVINGS can be made using SEO knowhow,it matters not a jot what conversions/royalties cost. money in the bank is what counts.

jimmy b - 10 Jun 2005 12:32 - 5691 of 27111

What would be nice sir is if you would come on to some other threads and give your expert opinion, your obviously so clued up. How about starting with NLR , i'd love to know .

ptholden - 10 Jun 2005 12:34 - 5692 of 27111

Can't understand why you don't all have IIdiot filtered. I don't mind reading both sides of an arguement, but the same old drivel, innuendo and twisting of facts bored me to death weeks ago. Filtered he is and filtered he will remain.

pth

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 12:35 - 5693 of 27111

superrod - I agree - but the only comments on savings are again "up to" "up to" - I still believe this conversion kit may have benefit on an old beat up machine - but IMO it cannot give any real savings against a latest up to date normal HS machine.

Then also - why spend money to convert the old one - why not just buy a new high speed latest HS one - and reduce manpower overheads with the higher speed ?

This IMO is why the sales are slow - fundamental problems that in reality in most cases there is no savings - only in extreme cases.

SEO remember - have said nothing - only others have said there is massive potential - SEO are all in the clear if this did - not saying it will - go down the pan.

stockdog - 10 Jun 2005 12:35 - 5694 of 27111

baza, eric - I can't see the head and shoulders, unless SEO was carrying a very heavy shoulder bag in previous weeks. Looks to me like a continuation of past patterns - big leg up on good news followed by mild retracement to a new support level, often with a triangular formation, before breaking up again. More inclined to Eric's legs than Instinct's h&s - but that's just a dog's-eye view of the world!

sd

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 12:38 - 5695 of 27111

paulmasterson1 - 10 Jun'05 - 12:30 - 5688 of 5693

paulmasterson1 - 09 Jun'05 - 16:49 - 5630 of 5687 edit

insiderinsidetheloonybin, still bashing Stanelco on all BB's available, still using other aliases to back up your own ridiculously negative stance on Stanelco, still posting your imaginations diahhrea all over the place, still losing money by not investing in Stanelco, still losing money by working for and investing(LOL !) in BPRG, still posting even though everyone has left you on your own on ADVFN, and everyone else, on every other board is either filtering you, or laughing at you.

You are sad, very very sad.

PM


PAUL - please keep to discussing Stanelco and not throwing abuse at me - Thank you.

hewittalan6 - 10 Jun 2005 12:39 - 5696 of 27111

My word, isn't it exciting on here today???

jimmy b - 10 Jun 2005 12:44 - 5697 of 27111

Alan, the normally mild manered Eric could be going 12 rounds with insider, Im going for Eric, after all his second name is Robinson !!

superrod - 10 Jun 2005 12:46 - 5698 of 27111

ii
i for one dont deride your scepticism. only a fool wont look at the downside.

however, dont you think its better that others beat the drum on your behalf? third party reccommendations are far better than self congratulation.

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 12:50 - 5699 of 27111

superrod - yes - true - and there has been a growing number of media write ups stating opinion that Stanelco are very overvalued.

I also find it quite good to read back through broker reports - the earlier ones - did you read EVO say to the effect "we expect a stream of machine conversion revenue to come in April" - totally wrong were they not ;-)

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 12:52 - 5700 of 27111

TTFN - time for lunch and squash.

jimmy b - 10 Jun 2005 13:04 - 5701 of 27111

Again , why not post on some other threads, i'd like to hear your opinion, Why just this one???????

paulmasterson1 - 10 Jun 2005 13:11 - 5702 of 27111


Hi All,

The Army could do with the expertise of ii, he/she/it could show them that losers never give up. Never again will they only need to take the best people the country can offer, they can take all kinds of iidiots, in the knowledge that if a war ever breaks out, they will have loads of cannon fodder, that will never give up, no matter how far the opposition advance.

LOL !!!!

Still ROTFLMAO at ii !!!!
PM

wilbs - 10 Jun 2005 13:13 - 5703 of 27111

Hmmm.....squash, that gives me an idea......

Fred1new - 10 Jun 2005 13:32 - 5704 of 27111

Jimmy for god's sake stop giving him ideas. I am fed up with fixing up the squelch button. But it does cut the postings to a manageable size.

pisces - 10 Jun 2005 13:45 - 5705 of 27111

Dear ii,please, please, please look at the seo chart over the last six months and tell me it`s not an illusion.How can you constantly slate a share that`s quadrupled in such a short space of time and refuses to crash, which if everyone who had believed your drivel would surely have done by now.You just don`t get it do you that not every share rises purely on fundamentles otherwise the share price wouldn`t be where it is today. Can you not see the potential with this company which by the way has probably had more press coverage than most in the last few months, and most of it good.Are you telling me and the rest of the decent people on this board that seo doesn`t have any potential, because if you are id`e love to hear your response.Rock on Paulmasterson, although i think you get carried away sometimes at least you`ve got seo`s potential at heart and long term i think your 1.00 price target will be hit.
Register now or login to post to this thread.