Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Tadpole , Microsoft/ Hewlett Packard Alliance. (TAD)     

Moneylender - 23 Jan 2003 08:09

graph.php?movingAverageString=%2C50%2C20

Tris - 02 Feb 2003 10:20 - 57 of 2262

Morning ains .yes agree on the need for better coverageif there is shorters at work here better coverage would stop these antics.
Not sure I agree with shorting full stop!! Bet BH is livid if this is true and guess hell be taking stepsId better say DYOR etc :0)
Tris

Tris - 03 Feb 2003 14:34 - 58 of 2262

Hello?? quiet on here chaps?
notice the 2x1.9mil trades have appeard on mam?
Tris

Densil - 03 Feb 2003 15:38 - 59 of 2262

Yes Tris, it looks like we are seeing some more rollovers today.
Looking at the trades, the bulk of them are down to traders with very few investors getting involved.
Can't see much sign of shorters closing and I think they're trying to tough it out.

D.

Moneylender - 03 Feb 2003 16:53 - 60 of 2262


Just had it confirmed, that todays trades are mistakes.

They are the ones that were shown on Friday.
so no confusion.


M

ainsoph - 03 Feb 2003 17:33 - 61 of 2262

Yese ME confimed the trades were duplicates ..... I think the 100k trades were also short rollovers ..... they will come unstuck in near future




ains

Tris - 04 Feb 2003 08:05 - 62 of 2262

Microsoft to pay $200 million for
PlaceWare
2/3/2003 4:57:25 PM
As companies look to cut costs during prolonged sluggish growth in the economy, they have
increasingly used Web conferencing for meetings, sales calls with outside customers and for online
training courses, turning to companies such as PlaceWare and publicly traded rival WebEx
Communications Inc. (WEBX) for Web conferencing services.


So with Magi and full interop, what is Tadpole worth???
Tris

Densil - 04 Feb 2003 08:29 - 63 of 2262

Curiously, the 1.9 Mill trades are listed on the Moneyam streaming for both Friday and Yesterday.
Are you sure its a mistake and not somebody trying to hide one behind the other?

Densil

Moneylender - 04 Feb 2003 11:24 - 64 of 2262

what some people think of MAGI and App Express!



In the P2P space, nothing else comes close to Magi.

& nbsp


Secure collaboration across a firewall with no extra configuration. SECURE VPN at this price - I want it!

& nbsp

More expensive than some of its peers - and for a large company that can be a significant extra amount - however the functionality and ease of deployment should mean that any extra costs are recouped with installation. Can't help but recommend.


Finally a tool that works with our firewall. Anywhere you can run a browser it just seems to work. I have to wait for Groove to integrate each individual tool, but Project, Visio, Autocad, and all the Microsoft tools just work across this network. About time someone added some functionality to those tools.

ainsoph - 04 Feb 2003 12:02 - 65 of 2262

It was a mistake Densil - checked it out with Datastream


ains


Fear of a Blue Coat?
February 3, 2003
By Christopher Saunders


One of the biggest players in network security is now angling to make a name for itself in the instant messaging market -- a move that will have dramatic implications for the number of players now making headway in the market.

Blue Coat Systems (Quote, Company Info), formerly known as CacheFlow, is a provider of proxy appliances to major corporations. Its products provide for filtering Web content, scanning for viruses, caching, and managing bandwidth.

Beginning in spring, Sunnyvale, Calif.-based Blue Coat will be adding instant messaging security to that list. Because its products use content monitoring to police open firewall ports, including IM in the mix is something of a cinch, offsetting the ability of most public IM clients to use a number of ports to connect to public networks.

"IM clients are port-agile applications -- say, you close port 5190 and these applications know how to roll over and look for new ports," said Charles Dauber, vice president of marketing at Blue Coat. "It takes sophisticated knowledge of Web security devices to manage that."

As a result, Blue Coat's IM Traffic Control, like most offerings now on the market, can lock down on IM traffic from most clients, including those using the large public networks and other popular systems, like Jabber. Blue Coat also can apply instant messaging use policies on a group and individual user level, and based on a number of criteria, including time-of-day. It provides logging capabilities, and can enact keywords-based restrictions on the fly -- providing for uses like blocking taboo words before they are transmitted during conversations.

Blue Coat's offering also links to corporate directories -- like LDAP, Active Directory, and Radius -- to determine user privileges.

What makes the offering unique, however, is that it is only available on its own, dedicated hardware. As opposed to most IM security applications, which run on common server operating systems and hardware, Blue Coat's security products work the same way as do most business-class firewalls and routers: running on their own, specialized machines, under a custom OS.

"It's not based NT or Linux, so you've got none of the issues like patching that you have general-purpose OSes," Dauber said. "That's why our Web security applications are so heavily employed by enterprise customers -- they understand a drop-in appliance with security and control, versus a software platform."

As routers and firewalls shifted from software to dedicated appliances, "we think the same thing will happen with Web security, and IM is a part of that," he added.

Additional Threats from the Newcomer

A number of other factors exist in addition to Blue Coat's unique selling point that could spell trouble for the IM security vendors now on the market.

For one thing, Blue Coat plans to aggressively sell its current customer base on IM Traffic Control. Considering that the firm has shipped upwards of 13,000 appliances to more than 5,000 customers worldwide -- including names like Aon Insurance, ABN-Amro, Boeing, Coca-Cola, Johnson Controls, Hewlett Packard, Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, Discover, Hitachi Data Systems, John Deere, the U.S. Army, and the U.S. Air Force.

Among that client list are a number of firms in financial services and healthcare -- potentially representing a major setback for the players currently in the IM security market, who generally view those heavily regulated markets as relatively easy sells for their offerings.

Seven-year-old Blue Coat also is banking that enterprises, even those that it's not already servicing, would prefer to deal with a more established player in IT than a new startup.

"Talking to customers ... they aren't interested in buying a separate solution from startups just for IM control," Dauber said. "We're already in a good chunk of the customers, so we don't have to resell them form scratch."

Blue Coat also plans to compete on a price basis. While costs for hardware could total about $6,000, Dauber said the company is price service at $10 per user, before volume discounting. Aside from that initial cost for new users, the per-seat fees are about half to a third of what America Online (Quote, Company Info), and Microsoft (Quote, Company Info) and Yahoo! (Quote, Company Info) have said they would be charging for their enterprise IM gateways.

"People would just prefer to keep the vendors they've got," Dauber said. "And we're hearing that they think pricing is relatively high, on a per-user basis. Some of the products on the market require client-side software, and they didn't want to have to deal with that. And they just didn't want to have to deploy an entirely new scheme just for doing IM control."

It's still very early in the game for Blue Coat, which is currently able to show off only beta versions of its product. On the other hand, vendors including Akonix, IMlogic, e-Vantage, Endeavors, and IM-Age are shipping their offerings already. FaceTime Communications, known for its IM logging and auditing product, said it soon plans a full-fledged enterprise security product -- similarly intending to upsell current clients on its new solution.

The big public network owners -- America Online, Yahoo! and MSN -- also are now selling or gearing up to promote their own offerings. Those, however, exert control only on their own clients within enterprises.

Christopher Saunders is managing editor of InstantMessagingPlanet.com.

snappy - 04 Feb 2003 12:21 - 66 of 2262

where's old_coast?

ainsoph - 04 Feb 2003 13:11 - 67 of 2262

worth a read

http://www.vrtprj.de/forum/index.php?topic=Endeavors


btw the 750K trade looks like a short close


ains

ainsoph - 04 Feb 2003 13:16 - 68 of 2262

http://reuters.multexinvestor.co.uk/research/Earnings.asp?ticker=TAD.L&country=GB&mxid=100037446&companyName=TADPOLE+TECHNOLOGY+PLC&sym=RE

snappy - 04 Feb 2003 16:39 - 69 of 2262

that downtrend still intact.

will it drop to 2p before turning around or might it go bust before revenues accelerate?

tad1.gif

snappy - 04 Feb 2003 16:45 - 70 of 2262

draw?epic=TAD&period=1Y&size=Medium

the spread has norrowed down from 20plus % to a more respectable 13%

:-)

ainsoph - 04 Feb 2003 21:33 - 71 of 2262

I must admit to being bemused at the idea of Tads as a share you can trade or invest by using charts - they are news led

It has probably escaped your attention that the company has now changed from being a hardware company to a specialised software company


ainsoph - 05 Feb 2003 08:26 - 72 of 2262

IBM/AOL: sending a message to their rivals

IBM and America Online are to improve interoperability between their instant messaging systems.

February 4, 2003 6:30 PM GMT (Datamonitor) - The two technology giants have agreed to jointly conduct a pilot test between IBM Lotus Sametime and AOL's Enterprise AIM Services, aiming to make communication between the systems easier and more efficient. However, their rivals are also expected to improve their own corporate offerings over the next few months.


IBM and AOL have announced a joint pilot program, focused on extending existing integration between IBM Lotus Sametime and AOL's Enterprise AIM Services. Sametime users can currently access their AIM buddy list features through a tab on the Sametime contact list. The pilot will add back-end integration to "provide enhanced management capabilities and integrated directory features", through integration with the AIM Enterprise Gateway and Enterprise AIM Services.

The agreement is the latest move in AOL's plans to leverage its extensive user base for the AIM service to make the business more lucrative. Last week it agreed a reseller deal with HP Services.

AOL and IBM have worked together in the instant messaging (IM) sector for a while now. AOL formerly teamed up with Lotus to develop server-to-server IM interoperability, although the project was ultimately put to one side and given little attention.

In 2001, the US Federal Communications Commission placed restrictions on AOL's IM business as one of the terms for the AOL and Time Warner merger. This included the requirement that rival IM networks must be able to operate with AIM before AOL would be allowed to offer advanced IM-based high-speed services, such as video conferencing.

However, this isn't the only opportunity likely to present itself from the development of the IM sector. There is currently a security gap developing in the IM sector. Instant messages are rarely checked for content or access rights, or recorded from the server side, resulting in growing security concerns. AOL has brought in FaceTime Communications to develop this functionality.

Several of AOL's competitors, including Microsoft and Yahoo! are likely to improve their own corporate products over the next few months, making the market tougher. But, so far, these offerings are only designed to function with one network system.

Limpsfield - 05 Feb 2003 08:35 - 73 of 2262

what's the risk grade

ainsoph - 05 Feb 2003 18:16 - 74 of 2262

about 500


Looks like another couple of shorts closing ......



ains

ainsoph - 05 Feb 2003 20:39 - 75 of 2262

WebEx launches new enterprise conferencing system

London, February 5 2003, (netimperative)


by Chris Lake

WebEx, a developer of web communications technology, has today launched WebEx Enterprise Edition, a product that integrates its existing web meetings, training and support applications.


The company, which is targeting threefold growth in European sales, has introduced its latest product to the UK and the continent in a bid to capture additional market share, while making it easier for companies to engage in web-based meetings while enabling participants to share applications and work on projects.

The benefits of the software are largely based around increased productivity and efficiency, as the product will reduce the need for employees to travel to business meetings, shaving costs while making it quicker for work to be completed. The collaborative software supports popular applications such as Microsoft Word, Outlook and Photoshop.

Analysts suggest that web conferencing is breaking into the corporate mainstream - so much so that Microsoft last month raided its war chest to stake its claim on the predicted revenues for the sector.

WebEx, which has over 6,000 customers and accounts for more than half of the global market, believes Microsoft's purchase of rival Placeware for $200m last month will further validate web communications, even if it ultimately leads to increased competition.

www.webex.com

ainsoph - 05 Feb 2003 21:32 - 76 of 2262

There we go - just where Tads comes in :-))


IM creates 'rampant security risk'
15:33 Wednesday 5th February 2003
Tony Hallett, silicon.com


Some IT managers are concerned that IM can send files that are not virus-checked past corporate firewalls , creating a threat to network security
Instant messaging (IM) is taking off in companies but self-installed consumer versions of software that allows this type of communication are posing a "rampant security risk" on networks.

Already some companies see IM as a time-wasting technology -- as was the case when email, Web access and even the telephone were first put on workers' desks -- but the latest warning, levelled by Blue Coat Systems, is based on three key factors.

The security appliance vendor highlights that IM is used to send files which firewalls don't pick up because they do not pass through corporate email systems; they are not checked for viruses; and they are not logged.

Nigel Hawthorn, Blue Coat's European marketing director, told silicon.com: "We're not against IM but companies must either stop end users installing IM software or, without such a policy, use tools to monitor its use. Both options come down to control."

Gartner analysts have declared 2003 the year when IM will take off and have warned IT managers that if they don't embrace the technology, their staff will do so often outside of the IT department's reach.

IDC has forecast there will be 255m worldwide IM users in the workplace by the end of 2006. However, according to a Blue Coat poll conducted outside train stations in the UK, around 88 percent of corporate IM users now only use the technology to communicate with friends and family.

Flagship providers of IM including AOL, Microsoft and Yahoo! are now gearing up for pushing corporate versions of their software, which pay more attention to recording communications and security.

Steve Boom, senior vice president, Yahoo! Enterprise Solutions, said: "There is no rampant security risk. Users know messages aren't encrypted, for example, and the way forward isn't to control consumer IM but look at integrating it with [a company's] IT."

He said IM can in some cases be at least as secure as email, with systems based on directories, such as those provided by Microsoft or Novell, for authentication purposes.

Register now or login to post to this thread.