for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Dear ii,please, please, please look at the seo chart over the last six months and tell me it`s not an illusion.How can you constantly slate a share that`s quadrupled in such a short space of time and refuses to crash, which if everyone who had believed your drivel would surely have done by now.You just don`t get it do you that not every share rises purely on fundamentles otherwise the share price wouldn`t be where it is today. Can you not see the potential with this company which by the way has probably had more press coverage than most in the last few months, and most of it good.Are you telling me and the rest of the decent people on this board that seo doesn`t have any potential, because if you are id`e love to hear your response.Rock on Paulmasterson, although i think you get carried away sometimes at least you`ve got seo`s potential at heart and long term i think your 1.00 price target will be hit.

He ment orange squash.

And peanut butter sandwiches with the crusts cut off.

Bos, Re thread is starting to feel like its old self again
Its not the thread its just you have started to take the right pills again.

Seq
Monday the Thirteenth, is my birthday, for real, its going to be a good day.

kshammas
I thought you said Greenhouse conversion, for a minute, it does fit better.

Positive Trader
Welcome to the mad house.

driver, methinks i spoke too soon. can someone give me a brief rundown as to why level 2 is so good, please?

L2 has 4 mm`s wanting to buy your shares and only one wanting to "dump"- sorry to sell them to you.

olie

i would have thought 4:1 was pretty good? short fishing trip?

Guys - I do like a good debate - and I guess that he who should be ignored is posting again - and he seems to have successfully stoked up the fire again.

I have squelched him, as regardless of whether there is an element of truth in anything that he says, - he completely undermines hineself by being so damned confrontational and blatantly negative. Any grain of truth is therefore lost in hs inuendo and lies - although as Eric says (I think), with all of his double talk - he is bound to get some bits right some of the time.

I for one will continue to ignore him (and thats my perogotive) and listen to reasoned and logical summations by others who take a more balanced view. As in some competitions - I ignore the highest score (the blatant ramper) an the lowest score (II) and analyse the views of the rest before making my own decision.

This BB was just starting to get back to its best - suggest we ignore II again and get back to sensible, balanced debate.

Baza

to be fair to ii. i havent seen a post from him that doesnt come under the banner of debate. i for one ( tho a holder ) will not bury my head in the sand. a day WILL come when this share peaks. as with all shares there will be a day when spleens are vented

Pisces. Your argument relating for the strength of growth for SEO is similar to that being voiced in regard to the Tech Marketin January-February 2000.

Those with nimble feet got out at that time. I think SEO is unlikely to be similar, but this pudding needs some prooving yet.

Superrod - that is your perogative - and I agree wuth you that SEO's day will come (as did BPRG's) - but I personally think that there are many others who are better qualified than me ( and maybe II) who take a more objective view of this share and the market so I will act with my fingers and squelch II - at least until he is more constructive than he is now.

Baza

Bos
Email sent as requested.

bhunt How will youk Know if you squelch him.

superr- got a bit windy, trying a mayfly down on the brook below us, not a nibble-
indeed I was commenting that 4:1 is good-I am long this thing to see what happens Monday, I have me doubts tho`

have a good weekend, blimey is that all it is 3.00 pm, better do a bit of gardening before the dragon returns.

Yes Fred - "I will squelch II until he is more constructive" how do you know unless you read ? LOL ;-)

Its an old trick - IMO they try to influence newbies into squelching people as they are afraid of them reading what is posted - that people need to keep saying "I squelched him" and then again "I squelched him" and later 1 week say the same again - its quite pathetic - but it serves a purpose of showing people for who they are and what their interest is - discussion - or just only spin and hype to get the price up and suck more people in.

Stanelco is in a very very risky stage now - thats why they are turning on me - as they cannot discuss the company they try to Bash the poster with a negative view - it means there is severe weakness now in SE0.

The MMs are now selling large volume at mid or under mid price - that means they expect trouble ahead and are clearing out.

Those who need to talk about squelching - never squelch IMO ;-)

Looks like 200K volume gets you mid price - over 200K volume you can buy below mid price - is that a bargain - or a warning sign ? ;-) DYOR !!!!!

Serious question ii. You state that MM's are selling large volumes at mid or under mid price. How do you know that? I see trades go through and I see the price that the trade was at, and I see the computers guess as to whether it was a buy or a sell. But thats it. I am very interested to know how you can state with certainty that a deal at or below mid price is a buy?

Must be his insiderinside information.

hewitt - those who trade on line can never know.

Phone your broker and ask him what price to buy for 200K and 500K - ask them to go the market and see what price can be got - then decline the trade after they get the price from the market.

You always get the best trading prices from a broker - on line trading is quick and easy but you get messed on the price.