Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


wilbs - 10 Jun 2005 14:01 - 5707 of 27111

And peanut butter sandwiches with the crusts cut off.

driver - 10 Jun 2005 14:04 - 5708 of 27111

Bos, Re thread is starting to feel like its old self again
Its not the thread its just you have started to take the right pills again.

Seq
Monday the Thirteenth, is my birthday, for real, its going to be a good day.

kshammas
I thought you said Greenhouse conversion, for a minute, it does fit better.

Positive Trader
Welcome to the mad house.

bosley - 10 Jun 2005 14:14 - 5709 of 27111

driver, methinks i spoke too soon. can someone give me a brief rundown as to why level 2 is so good, please?

Sequestor - 10 Jun 2005 14:35 - 5710 of 27111

L2 has 4 mm`s wanting to buy your shares and only one wanting to "dump"- sorry to sell them to you.

superrod - 10 Jun 2005 14:50 - 5711 of 27111

olie

i would have thought 4:1 was pretty good? short fishing trip?

bhunt1910 - 10 Jun 2005 14:52 - 5712 of 27111

Guys - I do like a good debate - and I guess that he who should be ignored is posting again - and he seems to have successfully stoked up the fire again.

I have squelched him, as regardless of whether there is an element of truth in anything that he says, - he completely undermines hineself by being so damned confrontational and blatantly negative. Any grain of truth is therefore lost in hs inuendo and lies - although as Eric says (I think), with all of his double talk - he is bound to get some bits right some of the time.

I for one will continue to ignore him (and thats my perogotive) and listen to reasoned and logical summations by others who take a more balanced view. As in some competitions - I ignore the highest score (the blatant ramper) an the lowest score (II) and analyse the views of the rest before making my own decision.

This BB was just starting to get back to its best - suggest we ignore II again and get back to sensible, balanced debate.

Baza

superrod - 10 Jun 2005 14:58 - 5713 of 27111

to be fair to ii. i havent seen a post from him that doesnt come under the banner of debate. i for one ( tho a holder ) will not bury my head in the sand. a day WILL come when this share peaks. as with all shares there will be a day when spleens are vented

Fred1new - 10 Jun 2005 15:03 - 5714 of 27111

Pisces. Your argument relating for the strength of growth for SEO is similar to that being voiced in regard to the Tech Marketin January-February 2000.

Those with nimble feet got out at that time. I think SEO is unlikely to be similar, but this pudding needs some prooving yet.

bhunt1910 - 10 Jun 2005 15:03 - 5715 of 27111

Superrod - that is your perogative - and I agree wuth you that SEO's day will come (as did BPRG's) - but I personally think that there are many others who are better qualified than me ( and maybe II) who take a more objective view of this share and the market so I will act with my fingers and squelch II - at least until he is more constructive than he is now.

Baza

driver - 10 Jun 2005 15:05 - 5716 of 27111

Bos
Email sent as requested.

Fred1new - 10 Jun 2005 15:06 - 5717 of 27111

bhunt How will youk Know if you squelch him.

Sequestor - 10 Jun 2005 15:11 - 5718 of 27111

superr- got a bit windy, trying a mayfly down on the brook below us, not a nibble-
indeed I was commenting that 4:1 is good-I am long this thing to see what happens Monday, I have me doubts tho`

have a good weekend, blimey is that all it is 3.00 pm, better do a bit of gardening before the dragon returns.

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 15:15 - 5719 of 27111

Yes Fred - "I will squelch II until he is more constructive" how do you know unless you read ? LOL ;-)

Its an old trick - IMO they try to influence newbies into squelching people as they are afraid of them reading what is posted - that people need to keep saying "I squelched him" and then again "I squelched him" and later 1 week say the same again - its quite pathetic - but it serves a purpose of showing people for who they are and what their interest is - discussion - or just only spin and hype to get the price up and suck more people in.

Stanelco is in a very very risky stage now - thats why they are turning on me - as they cannot discuss the company they try to Bash the poster with a negative view - it means there is severe weakness now in SE0.

The MMs are now selling large volume at mid or under mid price - that means they expect trouble ahead and are clearing out.

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 15:17 - 5720 of 27111

Those who need to talk about squelching - never squelch IMO ;-)

Looks like 200K volume gets you mid price - over 200K volume you can buy below mid price - is that a bargain - or a warning sign ? ;-) DYOR !!!!!

hewittalan6 - 10 Jun 2005 15:19 - 5721 of 27111

Serious question ii. You state that MM's are selling large volumes at mid or under mid price. How do you know that? I see trades go through and I see the price that the trade was at, and I see the computers guess as to whether it was a buy or a sell. But thats it. I am very interested to know how you can state with certainty that a deal at or below mid price is a buy?

wilbs - 10 Jun 2005 15:21 - 5722 of 27111

Must be his insiderinside information.

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 15:21 - 5723 of 27111

hewitt - those who trade on line can never know.

Phone your broker and ask him what price to buy for 200K and 500K - ask them to go the market and see what price can be got - then decline the trade after they get the price from the market.

insiderinside - 10 Jun 2005 15:22 - 5724 of 27111

You always get the best trading prices from a broker - on line trading is quick and easy but you get messed on the price.

driver - 10 Jun 2005 15:22 - 5725 of 27111

I think it's time for me links

No1 Share bashing can seriously damage your wealth:

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5028

No2 RESEARCH PAGE:

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5042

hewittalan6 - 10 Jun 2005 15:26 - 5726 of 27111

So how does this square with post 5709 showing that at 14.35 4 MM's wanted to Buy and only 1 wanted to sell. I am now confused as surely if only 1 were selling then he could command a premium, not a discount?
Register now or login to post to this thread.