for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Guys - I do like a good debate - and I guess that he who should be ignored is posting again - and he seems to have successfully stoked up the fire again.

I have squelched him, as regardless of whether there is an element of truth in anything that he says, - he completely undermines hineself by being so damned confrontational and blatantly negative. Any grain of truth is therefore lost in hs inuendo and lies - although as Eric says (I think), with all of his double talk - he is bound to get some bits right some of the time.

I for one will continue to ignore him (and thats my perogotive) and listen to reasoned and logical summations by others who take a more balanced view. As in some competitions - I ignore the highest score (the blatant ramper) an the lowest score (II) and analyse the views of the rest before making my own decision.

This BB was just starting to get back to its best - suggest we ignore II again and get back to sensible, balanced debate.

Baza

to be fair to ii. i havent seen a post from him that doesnt come under the banner of debate. i for one ( tho a holder ) will not bury my head in the sand. a day WILL come when this share peaks. as with all shares there will be a day when spleens are vented

Pisces. Your argument relating for the strength of growth for SEO is similar to that being voiced in regard to the Tech Marketin January-February 2000.

Those with nimble feet got out at that time. I think SEO is unlikely to be similar, but this pudding needs some prooving yet.

Superrod - that is your perogative - and I agree wuth you that SEO's day will come (as did BPRG's) - but I personally think that there are many others who are better qualified than me ( and maybe II) who take a more objective view of this share and the market so I will act with my fingers and squelch II - at least until he is more constructive than he is now.

Baza

Bos
Email sent as requested.

bhunt How will youk Know if you squelch him.

superr- got a bit windy, trying a mayfly down on the brook below us, not a nibble-
indeed I was commenting that 4:1 is good-I am long this thing to see what happens Monday, I have me doubts tho`

have a good weekend, blimey is that all it is 3.00 pm, better do a bit of gardening before the dragon returns.

Yes Fred - "I will squelch II until he is more constructive" how do you know unless you read ? LOL ;-)

Its an old trick - IMO they try to influence newbies into squelching people as they are afraid of them reading what is posted - that people need to keep saying "I squelched him" and then again "I squelched him" and later 1 week say the same again - its quite pathetic - but it serves a purpose of showing people for who they are and what their interest is - discussion - or just only spin and hype to get the price up and suck more people in.

Stanelco is in a very very risky stage now - thats why they are turning on me - as they cannot discuss the company they try to Bash the poster with a negative view - it means there is severe weakness now in SE0.

The MMs are now selling large volume at mid or under mid price - that means they expect trouble ahead and are clearing out.

Those who need to talk about squelching - never squelch IMO ;-)

Looks like 200K volume gets you mid price - over 200K volume you can buy below mid price - is that a bargain - or a warning sign ? ;-) DYOR !!!!!

Serious question ii. You state that MM's are selling large volumes at mid or under mid price. How do you know that? I see trades go through and I see the price that the trade was at, and I see the computers guess as to whether it was a buy or a sell. But thats it. I am very interested to know how you can state with certainty that a deal at or below mid price is a buy?

Must be his insiderinside information.

hewitt - those who trade on line can never know.

Phone your broker and ask him what price to buy for 200K and 500K - ask them to go the market and see what price can be got - then decline the trade after they get the price from the market.

You always get the best trading prices from a broker - on line trading is quick and easy but you get messed on the price.

I think it's time for me links

No1 Share bashing can seriously damage your wealth:

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5028

No2 RESEARCH PAGE:

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5042

So how does this square with post 5709 showing that at 14.35 4 MM's wanted to Buy and only 1 wanted to sell. I am now confused as surely if only 1 were selling then he could command a premium, not a discount?

Lets just wait - and see ;-) IMO the MMs are on a promise of an RNS early next week to assist with clearing those 44M - if we do get large buying next week - and the price hardly moves up - you know why.

If we can actually go about 10 days without yet another SE0 RNS (might start calling them PRNF (public relations news flash) - meaning no RNS next week - then it will be very weak.

I am waiting for a salad talk RNS - but they might avoid that for fear of abusing the RNS system (Asda is in effect with 1 order so no more need for trial news).

Couldn't get an answer to post 5726 from ii, so can anyone else explain this apparent anomoly to me. Seriously guys, if I am missing the point, I am still on a learning curve.
Alan

Fred - you can normally guage when II is back on the thread by the reaction of others. Eric tends to monitor his posts - and if he become too obtuse - he generally comments on them. I choose to ignore his postings

I place more faith in the likes of Eric, driver, Bos, Andy etal (especially Andy whi is actually in the packaging business) than I do with II. I may be wrong - but Eric, Driver, Boswell, Andy etal have so far got an exemplary track record - which is more than I can say for II. I think if the mood chganges - there will be others that will start to question the current strategy - so I for one am not going to read through the pages of misinformation (in my opinion) that is posted by II.

......and whats more - it feels good.

Baza

Top Reasearch driver, well done.
V helpful.

They -mm`s- are not interested in premiums or discounts 90% of the time , thats not to say they don`t use the situation to cash in as appropriate.Almost all of their money is made on the spread, the "mm`s playing games" theme is bb-BS.
MM`S are merely glorified barrow boys shouting their wares at a fixed profit (spread) if they see the market becalmed they will move the price to suit trades, up or down, they care little, and very rarely hold shares , why would a bookie own a horse?, they use derivatives to hedge.

gardening must come first

offski.