goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
MaxK
- 16 Mar 2015 15:50
- 57543 of 81564
Like or loath, he and his gang pull in the punters!
BBC's Top Gear slot loses 4m viewers after Jeremy Clarkson suspension
Repeat of Red Arrows: Inside the Bubble attracted audience of just 1.3m, compared with more than 5m typically drawn by motoring show
http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/mar/16/bbc-top-gear-jeremy-clarkson-suspension
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 15:54
- 57544 of 81564
As i said before if they sack him it's game over for that show no one else will be able to replace him also he may have had enough and walk.
And all in the name of bloody political correctness ...
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 15:54
- 57545 of 81564
it would seem that clarkson hit the other chap twice, and as such that has to be instant death
for bbc to do otherwise would completely undermine any employment policy they might pretend to
indeed, if clarkson did hit the producer not once but twice, he is very lucky not to have been charged
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 15:58
- 57546 of 81564
I have not seen that ,however the other fellow has not made a complaint .
However it was ok to keep Jimmy Saville on all those years .
MaxK
- 16 Mar 2015 15:59
- 57547 of 81564
ITV will be knocking on the door, not to mention sky.
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 16:02
- 57548 of 81564
Yes they will but i would imagine he can't take that format with him ,i would think there are restrictions .
Bloody pompous BBC , also now you have to put up with all the do gooders talking about the politically incorrect things he said ..makes me so ANGRY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh and iv'e always said the day the BBC (and it's been talked about) loses Wimbledon is the day i stop buying a license .
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 16:05
- 57549 of 81564
it's rather more more than just non-pc ..... it's assault at best and potentially ABH, though there may not be enough hard evidence to stand up in court
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 16:10
- 57550 of 81564
Don't be so delicate cynic ,the other fellow is not pressing charges ,clarkson 's not exactly Lennox Lewis is he ? what do you think happens when you tour with a rock band ,their scrapping every night .
And they are all attacking him now for his history of political incorrectness
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 16:15
- 57551 of 81564
sorry, but i don't think beeb has or had any choice
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 16:17
- 57552 of 81564
They had a choice with Jimmy Saville for god knows how many years but chose to sweep it under the carpet .
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 16:25
- 57553 of 81564
sorry but not comparable
js "crimes" were not in the public domain 40 years ago, so anything known about his proclivities were kept closely under wraps
whether or not clarkson set up this whole thing and ensured it came to public notice is an interesting question
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 16:28
- 57554 of 81564
Do you think no one at the BBC knew about Saville ???
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 16:32
- 57555 of 81564
Anyway i'm out of here before the politically correct crew arrive
What did annoy me was yesterdays Mail On Sunday (which i wouldn't buy) had the headline CLARKSON AS BAD AS SAVILLE which however the story read inside was disgusting .
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 16:32
- 57556 of 81564
no; i'm very sure senior management did and it is a racing certainty that it was deliberately kept under wraps for whatever nefarious reasons
as there was no "social media" and the likes of js were seen as being on an untouchable pedestal, no one else saw fit to spill the beans either
jimmy b
- 16 Mar 2015 16:48
- 57557 of 81564
Big Mistake by the BBC ,if he goes it's the end of the viewing figures for that show without doubt in my mind .
--------------------------------------------------------------
Insiders say the BBC – which holds the rights to the lucrative Top Gear format – is prepared to continue making the show even if it means getting a new presenter or presenters.
They say other shows, such as Have I Got News For You, survived the departure of a host and there was no reason Top Gear could not do the same.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2995106/Astonishing-remarks-Gear-affair-senior-BBC-boss-claims-Clarkson-like-Savile.html#ixzz3UZHQjlFC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 16:58
- 57558 of 81564
top gear is rather more dependent upon clarkson than hignfy was on angus deayton
anyway, if that is the price that has to be paid, then so be it
2517GEORGE
- 16 Mar 2015 17:01
- 57559 of 81564
Whilst JC was undoubtably the perfect man for the job it would be wrong, given what he has alleged to have done, for the BBC to continue as normal, no one person should be allowed to be bigger than the show/programme. This was the problem with JS he was too big a 'star' so his criminality was overlooked/swept under the carpet, does that mean we should do the same with JC's thuggery?
2517
Fred1new
- 16 Mar 2015 17:39
- 57560 of 81564
If I lied like Chairman Snappy of the Confidence Tricksters' Party, or Radio or TV, can I say I "screwed up" and I am a pal of Dodgy Dave's and it is time to move on.
What representatives for modern day toryism.
Not even blush.
No wonder the public will reject the cabal in May.
Would even make the UKIPPER'S embarrassed!
Mind with Wavey Dave's full confidence I don't give him much of chance!
Fred1new
- 16 Mar 2015 17:39
- 57561 of 81564
. Hic!
cynic
- 16 Mar 2015 17:41
- 57562 of 81564
fred - you're writing as if you've been on the piss today ... it reads as pretty much gibberish