bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
andysmith
- 25 Jan 2005 13:23
- 576 of 27111
In the words of Bosley, fuck me!!!
I first got SEO last April and since I got on this thread last Summer I doubt if there has been 26 posts between mine, I turn my back for a few hours and look what happens. DONT SELL AND TAKE PROFITS JUST NOW, YOU MAY LIVE TO REGRET IT!! Remember Bosley thought about it last week to buy back in dips, I said knowing my luck it wouldn't come back, well called that right just like backing SEO. When this really flys it will be a multi-bagger, too soon to call how many multiples but I think x10 in 2005, further out quite possibly x20 and from my start position last year, the luvvly-jubbly 50 bagger. Un-realistic, well to achieve 250p would need at PEx10, EPS 25 which is only 25% of the target market of this technology only. Keep on dreaming, it keeps us alive but I won't be selling for a long-time yet, just buying on any dips. I work in packaging and from previous experience know this is going to be successful. Good Luck to all and well done to all who backed ages ago and those now taken the plunge.
EWRobson
- 25 Jan 2005 13:56
- 577 of 27111
I like Diana's point about feeling the vibes for this share! Is that what you call feminine intuition or is it akin to the gut feeling, a variant of which is feeling it in the waters. Being a mere analytical male, You just analyse the fundamentals and compare the technical analyis. The conclusion is: everything is going for SEO - and its investors!
Its also super to have andysmith's view from the packaging industry, whi I hear saying that this is what the industry has been waiting for and it just has to take off. The other point to add in terms of the multiples is that the progression in trading figures will not be a straight line. Firstly, sales will follow the economic s-curve: first a few industry leaders buy the product, evaluate it and give it the thumbs up: that takes a year or so and we are in the middle of the process. Then the risk-averse majority come in and the gradient of sales increases several times. Second, add to that the gearing effect of the royalties and the curve is turning exponential. It would be impossible to forecast where it will be in 2 years time but it will be staggering.
Eric
bosley
- 25 Jan 2005 14:21
- 579 of 27111
afternoon all.a little calmer now than when i looked in last night. couldnt think of anything else to say. up again today . well done to the faithful and welcome to the newbies. eric, cfp starting to clamber up too. life is good. not sure about the new appointment . are we going to see a succession of rights issues? or are we going to have our rightful higher profile now? the potential of seo was there for all to see. it just needed time. (now i become evangelical) my people , the time is now. hallelujah!!!!!still sticking to my view of selling when i think the time is right and buying back in when it dips but holding tight for the moment.dont want to give a price as i am going to go on gut instinct, i know , not the best way to try to deal. unfortunately , my gut instinct has been right more times than my greed instinct , which is why i occassionally lose money, hold on too long. hello diana, your views are as good as eric, and as welcome. here's to more of the blue.
dexter01
- 25 Jan 2005 14:31
- 580 of 27111
afternoon all,
to save me reading everything, could somebody tell me what the situation is with this court case with bprg ?
many thanks,
dexter
tipton11
- 25 Jan 2005 15:49
- 582 of 27111
as a holder I would not wish to dampen euphoria but royalty rates are bound to be under pressure by a competent [large] customer while financing any explosion in orders will have its' problems, no doubt that is the reason for the appointment of the new fin dir which looks a very good move.
dexter01
- 25 Jan 2005 17:31
- 584 of 27111
driver,
we hope, but just look at what that would make the m.cap!
dexter01
- 25 Jan 2005 17:49
- 586 of 27111
point taken!!!!!
dexter
sellsell
- 25 Jan 2005 18:21
- 587 of 27111
Small Caps: Round-up of big-moving small companies
By Philip Stafford and Chris Flood
Published: January 25 2005 17:29 | Last updated: January 25 2005 17:29
■ News that Robert Boardman, formerly finance director at Durlacher and Altium Capital, had joined Stanelco as its finance director raised investor's interest on Tuesday. Mr Boardman's previous experience with Durlacher where he oversaw a major equity issue led to speculation that Stanleco, 1.5 per cent lower at 8p, is planning a similar rights issue. Stanelco has adapted radio frequency technology to food packaging. Trials with Asda are running currently and five other companies are rumoured to be interested. Stanelco denied it was looking for a rights issue and said Mr Boardman would help take the company through its current stage of development and help to release its full potential.
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/903082ae-6ef6-11d9-94a8-00000e2511c8.html
target="_blank">http://news.ft.com/cms/s/903082ae-6ef6-11d9-94a8-00000e2511c8.html
AdieH
- 25 Jan 2005 19:50
- 588 of 27111
Interesting the large buys at the end of the session, hope it drops slightly so I can top up again...
bosley
- 25 Jan 2005 20:12
- 589 of 27111
hello again driver( miss moneypenny) . well well, never mind . slightly down at the end. but tremendous volume. i see someone else picked up on the potenial rights issue possibilty. personally i wouldnt have too big a problem with it . seo may need more money to cope with possible demand. lets see what tomorrow brings.
andysmith
- 25 Jan 2005 20:43
- 590 of 27111
Those were some serious buys this afternoon, sp dropped to facilitate this?
I want to top-up but when? Sins of working in Packaging mean visiting customer in Deutschland Weds/Thurs, what will I come back to? However, don't really give a shit, better this than worrying about my portfolio like last year!!! If it goes up, great, if it goes down on profit-taking its top-up time. Keep looking at the sums from Shares mag which Bosley posted and I have banged on about several times, potential is frightening. This is just the start.
Poverty
- 26 Jan 2005 02:48
- 591 of 27111
I have never known so many people to get so excited about a lowly packaging company!!! Is it the second coming or something?? I have some SEO but I have doubts about it rising anything more than two or three times the sp that it is currently. A rights issue would NOT be good for the sp - and any issue would have to be weighty as there is already a huge 780,000,000 shares in issue. I think thay may do quite well - BUT - they are not yet in profit / they have a court case overhang and poss costs of 180K to pay / It is a full moon (not relevant but about as scientific as some of the posts in this thread!) Enjoy
andysmith
- 26 Jan 2005 08:19
- 592 of 27111
Poverty, the point is SEO are not a lowly packaging company.
They are a technology company and in this particular instance are licensing this to a much needy meat packaging industry and their masters, the retailers.
Things always do well when there is a need and this has many advantages, reduced costs/lower waste/lower taxes.
bosley
- 26 Jan 2005 09:27
- 594 of 27111
poverty,
" I have some SEO but I have doubts about it rising anything more than two or three times the sp that it is currently. "
you have doubts about seo rising anything more than two or three times the sp? if it does then for me that would ,in fact, be the second coming!!!!!i mean , there are loads of shares out there that have this obvious possibility.its so easy to double or treble your money. yes , seo are blue sky , but the blue skies are a hell of a lot closer for seo than a full moon. we all know the downside.nobody has forgotten the cc with bprg, but , as has been said many times before, the packaging side of seo , the technology , is 100% safe from the patent dispute. the company has confirmed this and seo have also said that the packaging side is what the company will be focused on in the future. the price has doubled from the recent low. a new coo and fd have recently been appointed. deals are being signed and trials are going well.its all good.
RD
- 26 Jan 2005 10:26
- 595 of 27111
As a shareholder the one thing I'd really like to know about this company is how to pronounce it.
Stann-elko
Stannel-ko
Stainel-ko
Or what!