Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


bosley - 10 Jun 2005 21:40 - 5763 of 27111

ii, i have a few questions for you. the amount of time and effort you put into your posts and the knowledge you display about the workings of the market tell me that shares are an important part of your life. we all know how you feel about seo, but what companies do you hold? are you an investor or a trader? and finally , is it seo you have a problem with or is it pm? i ask because i am sick and tired of myself and others on this thread being accused of ramping.

"superrod - 10 Jun'05 - 15:55 - 5737 of 5761


jimmyb,wilbs,
i think you are both very naive. if the only way is up, everyone and their mother would be buying this.

on the plus side, knowing that so many diehards are seo fans will make my exit a lot easier when the time comes.

no offence intended to ANYONE.......i just cant believe that peeps are parting with dosh and have little grasp of reality."

superrod , no offenece to anyone?? ...my arse!!!
apart from some very excitable moments from the start of the year, this has pretty much been a level headed thread. positive and negative points are brought up and discussed amongst investors, some of them working in the packaging industry, so providing us with a better insight into the company and also, more of a grasp on the reality of our investment. like most people who have invested in seo i am a die hard fan , taking a positive view of the company , and i will continue to do so until i feel differently. that doesn't mean to say that i do not see the negatives or have doubts about wether seo can achieve all that they possibly can. for now and the forseeable future the positives outweigh the negatives.
imo, the price is down because of next weeks placing, ( no shit , sherlock!!) without news it will probably follow the same course as feb's placing and drop further for a few days (no shit , sherlock!!). pm and ii have covered every other base so whatever happens they can both say , " i told you so".

driver - 10 Jun 2005 22:08 - 5764 of 27111

driver - 10 Jun 2005 22:10 - 5765 of 27111

Well I'm going for the middle ground for Monday not that I care a sh*t because I have been in since 3.95p and will stay to about 395p, cash in one of my share's and buy some sweets.

Monday will be a white-sky day.
postman_pat_costume_1.jpg

halfamil - 10 Jun 2005 23:06 - 5766 of 27111

Driver

Well said. Most of us have been in for some time and we're here to stay.

markusantonius - 10 Jun 2005 23:12 - 5767 of 27111

PM1, Any chance you can maybe keep it "brief" in future, mate? I fell asleep mid-way through! Ta.

andysmith - 11 Jun 2005 00:33 - 5768 of 27111

Well I don't give a shit if having a positive attitude to SEO makes me considered a ramper, my only view on this share is the potential based from my position within the packaging industry. In this industry, good news on the whole can be kept under wraps as it progresses, not that if I knew something I would post on here anyway BUT shit news travels like wildfire and there aint any that I've heard. However believe it or not superrod, I havn't parted with me dosh believing SEO will only ever go up you patronising sod. I "invested" based on a massive potential and if it did go tits up would not bury my head in the sand and big-up SEO but I would take my profits.
The main point re: SEO as of now is they ain't just a one product wonder.
I have to laugh at IC's high enough for now stance BUT in the same edition advise buying an explorer that needs to raise $150m investment to fund further developments. They like the pie in the sky explorers but NOT a company with the technologies (note the plural) to significantly change packaging over the next few years, saving costs/energy/product and delivering recyclable and biodegradable commercial products.

andysmith - 11 Jun 2005 00:36 - 5769 of 27111

ii, take it the folk who stump up 9m at 21.15p don't read your comments full of insiderinside bollocks?

Sharesure - 11 Jun 2005 08:17 - 5770 of 27111

Go out for the day and you get back to about 70 posts, not many of which seem to add anything new. Given that this is likely to be an extended, and in my view highly profitable ride, this thread will head for the Guinness book of records.How about one thread for news and research, the other for general chat? As it is your thread that is being hijacked, Bosley, I guess it is your call.
Now away for a week, hope the coming one produces a few orders, and a stronger sp on my return.

superrod - 11 Jun 2005 08:20 - 5771 of 27111

bosley
i genuinely dont intend offence to anyone....after all its in my financial interest for the sp to keep rising.

i stand by my comments.....this AINT going up forever. as i have previously said, a lot here have a VERY substantial cushion, having had the foresight to buy well under 10p. there are a lot of nervous investors though who have been buying up to 30p who dont have the luxury of merely seeing their PROFIT dwindle......its HARD CASH.

insiderinside - 11 Jun 2005 09:33 - 5772 of 27111

bosley - I have always said I make no comment on stocks I hold as I would have rose tinted specs - I have said many times in the past if a stock is ramped up I will comment on it - and I have not accused many people of ramping - some do - most other people are just holders who want to see the price rise - fair enough.

insiderinside - 11 Jun 2005 09:34 - 5773 of 27111

In case people skew the distribution cente Bloomberg/Asda interview - they are talking of logistics.

"Asda, which accounts for about 50 percent of Wal-Mart's international sales and 10 percent of total sales, will cut distribution center costs in areas such as packaging, Bond said"


It means distribution centres and not suppliers - it means perhaps getting things in ready palletised for immediate display on shelves and cutting down time required at the store preparing for display. Improving the palletising system to reduce time required from distribution centre despatch to availablity on the shelves is what others have already done - its all about logistics.

stateside - 11 Jun 2005 10:19 - 5774 of 27111

The fact that Stanelco's packaging provides increased shelf life, biodegradeable packaging, and further cost reductions on actual packaging is to become a massive extra bonus for Asda and WalMart.

Things are looking so good!

statesidestateside

stateside - 11 Jun 2005 10:19 - 5775 of 27111

The fact that Stanelco's packaging provides increased shelf life, biodegradeable packaging, and further cost reductions on actual packaging is to become a massive extra bonus for Asda and WalMart.

Things are looking so good!

statesidestateside

paulmasterson1 - 11 Jun 2005 10:42 - 5776 of 27111


andysmith Hi,

RE - 5767 of 5774

Excellent summing up :)

Cheers,
PM

bosley - 11 Jun 2005 11:03 - 5777 of 27111

morning. superrod, if no offence is meant then please lose the condescending tone in some of your posts. people arn't as thick as you think and if it all does go tits up , then there are plenty on this thread who will say so.

jimmy b - 11 Jun 2005 11:35 - 5778 of 27111

Thanks chaps ,but i didnt take offence at being called naive, ive been called a lot worst on here by sequestor,,,however if sitting on a 80% profit, in a company that looks like it may have much further to go is naive then i wish i made such stupid decisions on all my dealings, i'd be very rich by now (i'm not),like you say bos i,m sure if the tide turns ,the general feeling on this thread will also. I still enjoy reading the posts from all the regulars who were established here when i first found this bb...JB..

insiderinside - 11 Jun 2005 12:12 - 5779 of 27111

A few research links

Biogredable trays try Sharp Interpack

http://www.sharpak.co.uk/news.html


try Paper Coaters

http://www.papercoaters.co.nz/trays.htm



Biodegradable and compostable films try Innovia

http://www.innoviafilms.com/tools/whatsnew.htm

try Ecofilm

http://www.ecofilm.com/

try NatureWorks

http://www.natureworksllc.com/corporate/nw_pack_food.asp



This link below may shock a few people but Walmart and the likes have been working with many other companies since early 2004 this update of 1st August 2004 shows where things were moving then and if you research the companies mentioned you will find they have moved on much further and doing well this was about the same time that Stanelco launched their ambitions in this field however come June 2005 SEO are still struggling to find a market and still far behind the others people still dream but the world has moved on. DYOR.

http://www.modplas.com/inc/mparticle.php?section=worldtour&thefilename=worldtour08012004_01

People like to associate with whats already happening in the industry however its already happening (Walmart doing it for a long time already) not waiting to happen too late maybe for Greenseal ? If Biotec has a decent product they would not be a loss making company perhaps they know they cannot catch up so why not sell it off to SEO ??

The trials so far have been RF welded Cut To Open lidding (consumer unfriendly IMO) - and compared to standard consumer friendly peel off lidding - there will be an increase in shelf life - did they forget to say that ? ;-)


Sequestor - 11 Jun 2005 13:51 - 5780 of 27111

jaysus lads get out a bit more.

insiderinside - 11 Jun 2005 15:45 - 5781 of 27111

The Investors Chronicle says in summary - the price is high enough - all talk and no substantial orders or revenue for the fundamentals of making a profit and not a loss all the time.

Have a read - its on their free stuff - just register and read the IC Comment for 10th June 2005.


http://www.investorschronicle.co.uk to register for free and then -

http://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/content/free/2005/News/news_20050610_9.html

Sharesure - 11 Jun 2005 16:20 - 5782 of 27111

re 5780: without wanting to encourage you by countering your comments the IC did not say they were too high; my view of their comments is that they do err on the side of caution so I think their comment, given where SEO has come from, is one I think investors for the medium term can count as an endorsement for holding the stock at current levels. At what sp level does someone like you hang up your boots and admit that you have misread this one? On reflection don't bother to answer because I'm not that interested.
Register now or login to post to this thread.