for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Eric, I have decided that other than operating a stop loss at a sufficient maegin to allow for the inevitable fluctuations caused by bad mkt. days and/or the actions of shorters this stock is a longer term holding where I would rather rely on the RNS feed from the company and my own chats with the directors or where others have done the same. I have little patience with folk who try to manipulate prices by going short and then bashing; although in the longer term a good company will in my view always win through, in the short term it can be tiresome because it can damage, albeit temporarily, the price of an otherwise good stock. I accept that the actions of bashers can give topping up opportunities, but when you've finished doing that it would be preferable to be able to relax and watch events unfold in a commercial way.
I like to read your posts as they seam balanced, pointing up the obvious potential pitfalls without getting negative.

Eric, I am not rising to anymore bait and reading his comments.
As I said on an earlier post, bashers etc CAN write their opinion as to why it won't work, people who do have an insight on what is happening CANNOT for reasons of confidentiality etc. Walls have ears in my industry which means you can get to know "information" but that supply line can get cut off. I am relaxed about SEO from what I do know and from what I read on their other business ambitions via the RNS's and this thread.
I am in this to make money for myself and my friends, just so happens that SEO has been my most profitable by a long way and should go much further.
I will sell some next year for my trip to Australia, thats the whole point of investing for me, make dosh for things I otherwise might not have been able to do. If I hear something negative in the industry about SEO and RF I will re-assess and review my position and make decisions from there.
In 2004, SEO was struggling big-time with limited potential revenue streams and a potentially company destroying court case BUT now it is poised to make real impact in my industry with several world-class products IF the management plays this one right.

I am a lurker and have read this thread with much interest since January.

I do not post and but I do have over 500k invested in SEO - it is one of my major holdings - but I am not an expert investor.

I just wanted to say how much I appreciate the input of Eric with his balanced views and Andy with his inside knowwledge of the packaging industry, as well as other constuctive contributers.

I do not care a shit what II says - I do not think he is a constructive contributor - he has no shares and seems only interested in playing mind games. I do read some of his posts - but they do become increasingly tiresome.

I have absolute faith in this management team and I beleive this company has an excellent future. It will not be without its traumers (is that how you spell it) along the way, the share price will pull back from time to time , but I have a 3 year view and I expect to make some serious money out of my investment in SEO. However - I do recognise that this is a high risk share, that the results will not make pretty reading and that there are still some hurdles to jump - but in my view (remember , not an expert view) I think this company has great potential.

I will now disappear and watch the future with interest

Nealo

RESEARCH PAGE Updated 11/06/2005
The rapid advance of SEO to date:

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5042

Nealo: thanks for that! I suspect there are a lot who read threads as part of their research into a company as I do. I sometimes end up posting and then get to know the guys and gals. I suspect the number of people following SEO as serious investors runs into thousands, judging the compelte blue pages which follow a drop in price. But do come abck occasionally and give your opinion, please. Also, your comments on ii will represent, I am sure, the reaction of most visitors as hsi approach is so obviously biased for whatever reason. PM can be over-enthusiastic but you can see reasons for his posts whereas ii picks up on the jot and tittle (he would understand that) and makes a courtcase out of it! By the way - did you mean 500K? if so, you've arrived where most of us are setting as a goal!

driver: very worthwhile post. There are so many posts on this thread that the valuable ones get left behind - your research page is very helpful in this respect (will leave you to post the reference!). My question in general terms is how does Greenseal weigh with the other product initiatives in the market, for instance the ability to peel off the cover of a tray? If we take a typical supplier who delivers to ASDA but probably other supermarkets - what% of his machines should he retrofit? Is there a numerate way of defining the potential out of the 50K minimum machines operating?

Eric

Eric - yes I did mean 500k - and I am very comfortable with that level of investment.

Nealo

Nealo Lend me a bob for a drink. Haven't had one for a week!!

Any write ups in the weekend papers?

Andysmith your enthusisam for this stock with your inside knowledge is
comforting for those of us, outside of the industry. Would you say it is the generally held view inside the trade?
Why i ask is that i know of one other with the same belief in seo's system.
cyril

anyone who invests the majority of his investment in one share is asking for trouble, big trouble, and I think he may get it tomorrow, we`ll see.

Nealo, nice description of your position, ref the thread and the work done by the few to keep the many upto date with the progress made by SEO. I am sure there are others out here in admiration land who keep watching and appreciating the time investment value of this BB.

watcher Long term holder and still collecting

morning.there do seem to be quite a few lurkers and watchers out there, posting very occassionally to "hello". so "hello" back. IF there is no news tomorrow, i think we will be in bear country. also,the gloaters will be out in force telling investors how seo is over-hyped, over-valued and is now going to crash and burn. don't panic. the reasons why we have invested in seo haven't changed and if the pattern of trading follows the last placing in feb , then it will all settle down within days.

morning all, i am one of the watchers who post very occasionally, the reason being i dont have the knowledge of shares that most on this board have. when first on here i put dyor @ imho in the ticker symbol to see what sort of shares they where :)) but i have come along way since then, thanks to people like bos,andy driver and the rest of the sensible ones who post on here. so thanks to you all i am learning everyday.I hold a fair few shares in this company for sometime so i always try to be positive about most things in life especially this company.Thanks again to you all.

Apart from the IC comment on 10th June 05 mentioned in an earlier post its good to look at the past and see what happened then. Stanelco has a lot in the past promised everything and delivered very little on those promises IMO its more a romantic story a fairy tale that keeps recycling itself lots of promise latest wonder product fund raising by issuing more shares and in the end nothing and back again.

Take a read of a 2002 report

http://www.redskyresearch.com/db/587_Stanelco.pdf

It would also be interesting to look at the early days of some of the FT100 shares: no doubt you could go back to the early days of Tesco, HSBC, etc and laugh at the aspirations of the management. In my own industry, IBM as a punched card company immediately post-war or Microsoft prior to their contract with IBM around 1980. Hmm! Microsoft's contract with IBM compared with SEO's contract with ASDA, then Wal-Mart. The parallel is technological leadership in a major market sector. 'Cometh the hour cometh the man'.

Eric

Eric - Good post. I liked the reference to Tesco's early days, even I wouldn't use them in my early working years when money was short!!!!!
lol to all holders.
Sambal

A big hello to all lurkers and welcome to your support for the kind of thread this used to be.

Sequestor - try to be helpful - like with a bit of substantiation for your reckless remarks. BTW, what on earth leads you to suppose anyone has the majority of his investment in one share - bit of a conclusion to jump to, n'est-ce pas?

Eric, don't want to start a lengthy correspondence on this one (a la Anomalous and Wendy's ding-dong over on NML - streuth! Seq. you might well enjoy that one.), but I was brought up on "Cometh the bone, cometh the dog" - what sort of master are you? Honey may well have a view on this issue - perhaps you could help with her response.

And yes, I once had a marketing system based on punched cards and knitting needles, NOT so long ago. Perhaps, "Cometh the chip, cometh the pin" is more pertinent to Microsoft (or as they say on Corrie - "Cometh the chip, cometh the pan"!).

lol

sd

Good gosd - if we are in remonisce mode - I also remember the punch cards as a mainframe programmer on an IBM 360/30. Ther is more memory in my watch than we had in those days with those colossul beasts. I ended my days as Technical Support Manager for one of the big FTSE 100 insraance companies - and the power in those beasts was immemse.

C'est la vie

baza

Driver Hi,

As you are driving(lol!) could you add the full Greenseal history to the research page ?

16 July 2004 Stanelco announce Patents applied for on what will be eventually named 'Greenseal'

17 August 2004 Agreement with Robert Reiser, a deal on Greenseal which was superceded by the ASDA deal

24 September 2004 Grampian Country Food Group to run trials on Greenseal

13 October 2004 Oscar Meyer to run trials on Greenseal

16 November 2004 ASDA to run trials on Greenseal

23 December 2004 First trial for ASDA commences

8 February 2005 Stanelco plc announces update re trials with Asda

Cheers,
PM

baza
blimmy baza your a bit young, what about one of these.