goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Haystack
- 05 Apr 2015 20:36
- 58359 of 81564
Ed Miliband would be a 'catastrophe' for Britain say 70% of Britain's FTSE 100 business chiefs
Poll of FTSE 100 bosses reveals overwhelming support for the Tories
Seven out of 10 said Ed Miliband fearful of a Labour Government
Seven out of 10 business chiefs at Britain's biggest companies think Ed Miliband would be a 'catastrophe' for Britain, a survey has revealed.
The poll of FTSE 100 chairman has revealed overwhelming support for David Cameron to remain Prime Minister, despite the widespread business concern over his pledge to hold an in-out referendum on Europe.
It comes just days after more than 100 company bosses signed a letter warning against a Labour government. It also echoes controversial remarks by the Boots chief executive Stefano Pessina who sparked fury after claiming it would be a 'catastrophe' for the UK if Labour won the election.
The poll of 35 business chairman, by the headhunters Korn Ferry, is a further blow to Labour which is struggling to repair its relationship with big business after a series of controversial policy announcements.
Mr Miliband last week vowed to ban 90 per cent of zero-hours contracts and unveiled proposals to make it easier for workers to take their bosses to court for unfair dismissal.
He also confirmed plans to raise corporation tax for the first time in 40 years to raise cash for a £400 cut in business rates for smaller firms.
One of the FTSE 100 bosses surveyed, who did not want to be named, said businesses could work with Labour's shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna and its economics chief Ed Balls.
But he said Mr Miliband's 'tone and rhetoric' had proved 'deeply disturbing', adding: 'At times his language is vitriolic and he appears to completely misunderstand business.'
Fred1new
- 06 Apr 2015 08:34
- 58360 of 81564
Haze,
Do they give ad
vice on tax avoidance to party donors?
,
cynic
- 06 Apr 2015 08:37
- 58361 of 81564
instead of being stupid fred, what do you think you should happen .....
a) to help or even prevent people spending all their pension pot prematurely
b) once that pension pot has gone, arguably spent profligately rather than just through unexpected longevity
Fred1new
- 06 Apr 2015 08:38
- 58362 of 81564
Fred1new
- 06 Apr 2015 08:38
- 58363 of 81564
.
cynic
- 06 Apr 2015 09:33
- 58364 of 81564
yoo hoo!
when you've finished posting excerpts from the beano, have a look at my post just above and let us know your thoughts
MaxK
- 06 Apr 2015 09:38
- 58365 of 81564
c.
It depends on what the pension pot is spent on (of course)
cynic
- 06 Apr 2015 09:53
- 58366 of 81564
yeeees, but as far as i can see there's no restriction, albeit that there may be tax implications if your drawdown is too great or in a single lump ...... so the questions i raised still remain
and before you ask, i'm not sure what should happen, as if you run out of money, it will almost always be through lack of proper and prudent planning ...... i guess you'll end up with just your state pension, though not all will be entitled to that - eg if you haven't worked enough years or whatever the rules are
MaxK
- 06 Apr 2015 10:15
- 58367 of 81564
As far as I can tell, how many years you have paid in don't count anymore.
MIG has taken care of that (I think) so the peeps can piss it all up the wall, and fall back on the taxpayer.
cynic
- 06 Apr 2015 11:13
- 58368 of 81564
mansion tax
all hypothetical and with luck won't come to pass ....
however, if the tax is to be personal, then presumably if your house is jointly owned as is often the case, then presumably the notional £2m threshold should become £4m..... hahaha!
Fred1new
- 06 Apr 2015 11:32
- 58369 of 81564
Based on rateable value.
Ha, Ha.
=-=-==
Is it true, as reported, previously tory party members, MPs and councillors flocking in droves to, or doing back room deals with UKIP?
Haystack
- 06 Apr 2015 12:21
- 58370 of 81564
For people with big pension pots, I can see them taking the 25% tax free and leaving the rest where it is for now. They could use that 25% to help children and family members get on the property ladder. There may also be a few who cash in to put the money into property. In either case it may boost the housing market.
cynic
- 06 Apr 2015 12:33
- 58371 of 81564
property
at present, you can't put pension money into residential
i wonder if that will be varied
mansion tax
rateable values have little reflection on realiseable reality .... and even these can change considerably and not necessarily upwards
in any case, if the tax were to be raised, it was surely a personal tax, and therefore my slightly facetious comment above would still stand
Haystack
- 06 Apr 2015 13:52
- 58372 of 81564
The rules now are that you can spend the money on anything. You can depend it on a holiday, a car or just having a hood time.
required field
- 06 Apr 2015 15:18
- 58373 of 81564
Twin peaks might make it back to the screen with some damn good coffee !.....without or without David Lynch.....(his directing is fantastic though)....
required field
- 06 Apr 2015 16:19
- 58374 of 81564
I think being a Twin peakie is a bit like being a Taddie (Tadpole Technology)....or having once owned an Alfa-Romeo......all a bit weirdly... but fascinating !.... come to think of it ....thinking of voting for the Lib-Dems...might be added to the list....
Haystack
- 06 Apr 2015 16:36
- 58375 of 81564
I used to like the woman who walked around with a log under her arm.
I doubt that it will go ahead without David Lynch.
Fred1new
- 07 Apr 2015 08:42
- 58376 of 81564
Fred1new
- 07 Apr 2015 08:43
- 58377 of 81564