goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
hilary
- 20 Apr 2015 08:45
- 58820 of 81564
Maybe you'd all rather the Italian navy sent gunboats to blow them out of the water?
Fred1new
- 20 Apr 2015 08:46
- 58821 of 81564
Who?
The old etonian bully boys, or the Scots?
jimmy b
- 20 Apr 2015 08:54
- 58823 of 81564
If your talking about that stupid publicity seeking woman , then hopefully she has gone a step too far and that is the last we will hear from her.
2517GEORGE
- 20 Apr 2015 08:57
- 58824 of 81564
It's a straight choice between Cameron or Sturgeon.
2517
aldwickk
- 20 Apr 2015 08:57
- 58825 of 81564
Send them to Herault and Gard , that's nice and safe
aldwickk
- 20 Apr 2015 08:57
- 58826 of 81564
.
2517GEORGE
- 20 Apr 2015 09:02
- 58827 of 81564
On Squawk Box this morning one of the guest speakers has placed a bet on a Tory/Labour coalition, saying their policies were closer than the alternatives.
2517
Fred1new
- 20 Apr 2015 09:14
- 58828 of 81564
Then I suggest "one" is put back on his medication!
-=-=-=-=-=
It would seem to me that Cameron doesn't understand the Democratic process.
Seems to me, the nasty party is prepared to use Fascist techniques of the 30s are becoming more and more out of touch.
Fred1new
- 20 Apr 2015 09:36
- 58830 of 81564
England frightened by a woman?
What are things coming to?
Cameron will have to cosy up and lick the ... of Nigel and his brown skirts and promise him a cabinet post. (Bar Man.)
-=-=-=-=
It will be a relief to have a government for all once again.
=====
I suppose they could privatise government.
OOPs forgot, they have already considered that!
Haystack
- 20 Apr 2015 09:37
- 58831 of 81564
Italy receives the migrants and then let's them go to roam Europe. They don't have facilities to keep them all in camps, so it is easier to move them on. Taking them back to where they came from is not an option.
MaxK
- 20 Apr 2015 09:43
- 58832 of 81564
Why not?
VICTIM
- 20 Apr 2015 09:53
- 58833 of 81564
Maybe if there were Italian gunships in the med stopping them coming over , maybe they wouldn't drown in an over laden ship . Maybe IF the African authorities stopped them from sailing to their DEATHS . Or are they just glad to see the back of them. Dumped on Europe then its our problem our cost etc.
Haystack
- 20 Apr 2015 09:56
- 58834 of 81564
The places they are coming from are war zones. It wouldn't be possible to return them.
Haystack
- 20 Apr 2015 09:58
- 58835 of 81564
The numbers coming to Europe is very small in the scheme of things. The population of Europe is around 750 million and there are a few thousand refugees.
hilary
- 20 Apr 2015 10:00
- 58836 of 81564
Surely that would be a waste of a good gunship? If you're gonna send a gunship to sea in the first instance, wouldn't it be far better just to kill them all? It's not as though the migrants are armed and can fight back, so it's a low-risk strategy.
VICTIM
- 20 Apr 2015 10:07
- 58837 of 81564
Who's talking about killing them , I said if they don't get on the boats in the first place they won't drown will they. So why is the Pope so concerned if there are only a few thousand refugees.
Haystack
- 20 Apr 2015 10:28
- 58838 of 81564
Why does it matter what the Pope thinks or says. Why not take some notice of the head of a group that believes the Earth is flat or worships fairies. There is far too much notice taken of groups who try and contact extra terrestrial beings and think they are being watched over by them. Delusional groups should have no influence in public affairs.
VICTIM
- 20 Apr 2015 10:32
- 58839 of 81564
Naggy .