goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Chris Carson
- 27 Apr 2015 12:10
- 59223 of 81564
I wonder if Miliboy is as good at creating money as he is at destroying it. First the energy companies, then the builders and he's not even elected yet? Who's next one wonders? He will never be PM, but still his mission to damage the UK economy carries on unabated.
cynic
- 27 Apr 2015 12:45
- 59224 of 81564
perhaps labour will nationalise housebuilders as well, to ensure they don't make more than 5% profit .... mind you, with plenty of new managers and paperwork in place, they'll be lucky to make any profit at all
it never ceases to amaze me how utterly gormless 95% of politicians are, with some totally preposterous and unthought "wonder schemes" splattered all over the place .... the inevitable, "oh, it was meant like that and it was all taken out of context" swiftly follows
Stan
- 27 Apr 2015 14:03
- 59225 of 81564
I have it on good authority that you will be nationalised, and about time to in my humble -):
cynic
- 27 Apr 2015 14:09
- 59226 of 81564
that means you'll own a part of me .... what a privileged chap you will be :-)
Haystack
- 27 Apr 2015 14:13
- 59227 of 81564
Conservatives still on course for a majority.
cynic
- 27 Apr 2015 14:25
- 59228 of 81564
total bollocks ...... most seats yes, but majority not in a zillion years
Stan
- 27 Apr 2015 14:34
- 59229 of 81564
You have to realise that H/S lost the plot years ago Alf.
cynic
- 27 Apr 2015 14:45
- 59230 of 81564
i've just the plot for him - in willesden cemetry :-)
Stan
- 27 Apr 2015 14:46
- 59231 of 81564
What a good idea, can I contribute -):
aldwickk
- 27 Apr 2015 15:24
- 59232 of 81564
I bet you that Labour will try and tax speadbet's , Milli as allready said he will tax sporting bet's.
Clem Chambers said he has a bet that UKIP will get 5 seats
cynic
- 27 Apr 2015 15:34
- 59233 of 81564
i confess i have always been puzzled that s/b are not treated the same way as cfds or even shares - ie as for cgt
Stan
- 27 Apr 2015 15:47
- 59234 of 81564
Probably because some of the political crooks and their mates are in on it themselves.
cynic
- 27 Apr 2015 15:52
- 59235 of 81564
the current ruling goes back a great many years
for some reason s/b is regarded as gambling whereas cfds and shares are perceived as investing .... all a bit esoteric, but i guess it may be to do with s/b having time constraints or somesuch ..... i wonder how traditional traded options are classified for taxation purposes
Fred1new
- 27 Apr 2015 16:05
- 59236 of 81564
Keeping the books may be to difficult.
Better to tax the profits of the companies.
But I suppose they could put a levy on a deal!
Stan
- 27 Apr 2015 16:09
- 59237 of 81564
Good idea Fred, and double tax if they contribute to the "Con" Artists.
hilary
- 27 Apr 2015 16:10
- 59238 of 81564
Betting (including spread betting) is a zero sum game. If governments start taxing punters on their winnings, there would also have to be a strong case on them offering relief on punters' losses, and, by virtue of the fact it's a zero sum game, it would almost certainly cost the government money overall.
As it happens, the game player who stands the greatest chance of winning (ie. the bookie) is already taxed on their profits.
hilary
- 27 Apr 2015 16:11
- 59239 of 81564
hilary
- 27 Apr 2015 16:14
- 59240 of 81564
Also gambling tax law changed at the end of last year. Bookies now pay tax based upon 'point of contribution' instead of 'point of supply'. So offshore bookies must pay HMRC on profits made from UK clients.
aldwickk
- 27 Apr 2015 20:40
- 59242 of 81564
As spread bet punters loose 90% of they money inside 9 months , then Hilary could well be right