for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Notice the lack of "Holdings in Company" RNSs - now where are all those institutional holders ? ;-)

Food for thought. Being a lover of Salmon Fillets which i stopped buying from Sainsburys about 6 months ago because packaging looked terrible, and the fish always looked like it was sweating.
To me this was a Sainsbury product, typical buy one get one free. Today decided to look again out of interest and found a complete new packaging for the Salmon with a big label on saying a Youngs product.It has a complete new tray and appeared to be covered with a Vacuum pack? The whole product looked 90% better than it did before and leek free. Whereas the old product had a very poor tray and just sealed along the top which always seem to vulnerable to leaking. I thought this might be of interest to all. Maybe somebody in Packaging might comment

Yes jimmy - if I see they get more than 700 orders then onwards - if its just a trickle and struggle to get 100 or 200 then its down and out.

The Biotec deal if it goes ahead will certainly be bad news - it will not work IMO - these kind of things just do not work - loss making buys loss making in the HOPE of doing this and that - not good.

It would be better for SE0 if the deal was off and they kept the money.

holdings in company rns' only get declared if the holding is above 3%. like everyone , i think institutions want more orders. ii, i haven't seen the heavy ramping you speak of. could you point it out , please? stateside, what rumours? please try to keep rumour bollocks off this thread....good or bad.

jimmy
You know I don't talk to ii, but what I think he is saying is that FROGPACK, GREENSEAL, CRADLEWRAP doesn't exist and SEO didn't make an acquisition of Biotec.
When the truth comes out the sp is going to 4p, blimmy thats generous I would have thought the company would have gone under.

YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST 11'S IN THE MIDDLE, I knew you.d come round in the end

bos
bollocks what is this word?

lol. i just have a thing against rumours.

Well i better not tell you my theory about Elvis then.

bos - the half a million holder - and stateside on here - other BBs much more going on now - all at the same time - Moneyam is as always nearly devoid of it - but creeping in here and there.

jimmy - middle yes - inclined for it being all hype - not so inclined on it all being true.

Weak times - interims coming - I have said before - in the abscence of big orders if I was holding I would have got out and wait until interims are clear or a big (over 100 at least ) order comes in.

Buyouts always results in weakness - I would have sold if not before then as soon as they made the announcement of paying 25M US$ for a loss making company in which they only HOPE they can achieve something.

Its quite normal one person posts a rumour on one site - then under a different name they copy and past to another BB and say "look what I saw on MoneyAM".

Normal tricks.

the 500k holder and ss made two short statements. that hardly constitutes heavy ramping. as you say mam is pretty much devoid of it which is why most of us are here and not on other bbs. we also like it devoid of ott bashing and deramping , which is why you were the subject of everyones abuse. much prefer your new style of posting which is more thread specific, has a point and doesn't get on your tits as much.

I agree treikiman - I hate leeks with salmon. Are Youngs allowed to supply Sainsbury with the new packaging under ASDA's exclusive deal?

Bos - I think Stateside's rumour was meant to be useful - i.e. look out for a possible RNS at 2.30pm. Recently in Cannes, sitting on the Carlton Hotel terrace, I started a rumour about a company with whom I had a meeting in an hour's time. The rumour went all the way round the terrace and came back to me. I went to the meeting and arrived to find the rumour had become true. Made me feel very powerful - but spooky, know what I mean dahlin's!

sd

sd, no would be the answer. but in reality , how could asda monitor it?

Quite easily bosley, a rep for Asda would just walk in and buy a pack , when i was in sales and marketing we used to do this sort of thing all the time.

Bos - to be fair II is a cynical old tart. There's little that can be gleaned from his posts other than increasingly manipulative ways of winning trust so he can cast doubt.

If he could back up his comments without ridiculing himself with proposterous claims of SEO armageddon he might get some semblence of credibility. Until then he's regarded as a nuisance to me.

sd, go on. tell us what the rumour was?
chiva, fair enough.

For those who like statistics, the current retracement from 28.5 to 22.5p is 21.05% - very similar to that in February from 17.0 to 13.25p, 22.05%.

So the SP is at least consistently volatile.

sd

consistently volatile!! i like that one. got a copright on it SD??
Alan

If it's worth something, yes! If I see it on BRPG's thread I will immediately issue a writ.