Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

The Forex Thread (FX)     

hilary - 31 Dec 2003 13:00

Your browser does not support JavaScript! Your browser does not support JavaScript!
Your browser does not support inline frames or is currently configured not to display inline frames.
Forex rebates on every trade - win or lose!

Harlosh - 15 Sep 2006 14:39 - 5973 of 11056

Thanks Hilary. What happened there. Still 5 mis to Michegan?

hilary - 15 Sep 2006 14:43 - 5974 of 11056

It's obviously not waiting for Michigan after all.

:o)

hilary - 15 Sep 2006 14:46 - 5975 of 11056

13:44 GBP/USD: Trips Stops Below 1.8800 & 1.8780, Large 1.8750 Expiry] London,
September 15. Sterling has tripped stops below 1.8800 and 1.8780 en route to an
intra-day low of 1.8763, amid speculation that September"s preliminary Michigan
sentiment index may come in much better-than-expected. Consensus forecast: 84.0.

More stops reportedly reside below 1.8760. These could further depress cable
to/through 1.8750. An estimated GBP 350mn 1.8750 option strike rolls off at
today"s 10am EST NY cut (14:00GMT). 1.8710 (Wednesday"s low) is a bear target
south of 1.8750.

Harlosh - 15 Sep 2006 15:14 - 5976 of 11056

Thanks for that Hilary.

My short is doing well and I have a target of 8685 if it ever gets there - probably monday now but I won't be here :-(

foale - 20 Sep 2006 13:44 - 5977 of 11056

I noticed this thread is falling off the main page...

"How very dare you"... LOL


Eur/ Usd trying to impersonate a straight line..

bakko - 20 Sep 2006 13:58 - 5978 of 11056

All very quiet on the cable coal face too.

I guess everyone's waiting for the FOMC later but then again no change is expected.

So expect more straight line stuff.

hilary - 20 Sep 2006 14:02 - 5979 of 11056

It's always like this ahead of the Fed. Its still a long though for now, imo.

hilary - 20 Sep 2006 14:04 - 5980 of 11056

Wow. It woke up all of a sudden.

chocolat - 20 Sep 2006 14:13 - 5981 of 11056

What a beautiful mover :o)

bakko - 20 Sep 2006 14:14 - 5982 of 11056

That horizontal line has suddenly decided to be vertical!

chocolat - 20 Sep 2006 14:24 - 5983 of 11056

And it's so much prettier than fiber.

Harlosh - 20 Sep 2006 16:42 - 5984 of 11056

Teach me to have some time off before FOMC. :-(

chocolat - 20 Sep 2006 16:45 - 5985 of 11056

Oh 'eck, Harlosh - were you still short from Friday?

Harlosh - 20 Sep 2006 17:13 - 5986 of 11056

No no Choc. Just missed an opportunity today that's all :-)

chocolat - 20 Sep 2006 17:17 - 5987 of 11056

Phew
That's ok then :)

chocolat - 20 Sep 2006 17:19 - 5988 of 11056

2 hours to fireworks then.
Maybe ;)

bakko - 20 Sep 2006 19:25 - 5989 of 11056

Rate held as expected but cable's gone ape s**t

hilary - 20 Sep 2006 19:26 - 5990 of 11056

Oooops. Forgot all about the Fed as I was just getting ready to go out.

Here's the statement in case nobody's seen it.

[18:17 US ECON: FOMC Statement] Boston, September 20, 2006
The Federal Open Market Committee decided today to keep its target for the
federal funds rate at 5-1/4 percent.
The moderation in economic growth appears to be continuing, partly
reflecting a cooling of the housing market.
Readings on core inflation have been elevated, and the high levels of
resource utilization and of the prices of energy and other commodities have the
potential to sustain inflation pressures. However, inflation pressures seem
likely to moderate over time, reflecting reduced impetus from energy prices,
contained inflation expectations, and the cumulative effects of monetary policy
actions and other factors restraining aggregate demand.
Nonetheless, the Committee judges that some inflation risks remain. The
extent and timing of any additional firming that may be needed to address these
risks will depend on the evolution of the outlook for both inflation and
economic growth, as implied by incoming information.
Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman;
Timothy F. Geithner, Vice Chairman; Susan S. Bies; Jack Guynn; Donald L. Kohn;
Randall S. Kroszner; Frederic S. Mishkin; Sandra Pianalto; Kevin M. Warsh; and
Janet L. Yellen. Voting against was Jeffrey M. Lacker, who preferred an increase
of 25 basis points in the federal funds rate target at this meeting.
Source: Federal Reserve

hilary - 20 Sep 2006 19:27 - 5991 of 11056

[18:15 US FED: Lacker Dissents Again, Fed Leaves Rates Unchanged] Boston,
September 20. Perhaps one of the only surprises to the FOMC statement is the
second dissent from Richmond Fed's Lacker. Nevertheless, policy was unchanged
at 5.25% and the inflation risk language was maintained.
The cooling in the housing market was no longer described as "gradual" and
energy prices, despite large declines in September, were deemed threatening to
the inflation outlook. -- Jeoff.Hall@thomson.com

Harlosh - 20 Sep 2006 19:37 - 5992 of 11056

thanks Hilary
Register now or login to post to this thread.