Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


jimmy b - 15 Jun 2005 13:09 - 5982 of 27111

Quite easily bosley, a rep for Asda would just walk in and buy a pack , when i was in sales and marketing we used to do this sort of thing all the time.

Chiva20 - 15 Jun 2005 13:12 - 5983 of 27111

Bos - to be fair II is a cynical old tart. There's little that can be gleaned from his posts other than increasingly manipulative ways of winning trust so he can cast doubt.

If he could back up his comments without ridiculing himself with proposterous claims of SEO armageddon he might get some semblence of credibility. Until then he's regarded as a nuisance to me.

bosley - 15 Jun 2005 13:16 - 5984 of 27111

sd, go on. tell us what the rumour was?
chiva, fair enough.

stockdog - 15 Jun 2005 13:27 - 5985 of 27111

For those who like statistics, the current retracement from 28.5 to 22.5p is 21.05% - very similar to that in February from 17.0 to 13.25p, 22.05%.

So the SP is at least consistently volatile.

sd

hewittalan6 - 15 Jun 2005 13:30 - 5986 of 27111

consistently volatile!! i like that one. got a copright on it SD??
Alan

stockdog - 15 Jun 2005 13:32 - 5987 of 27111

If it's worth something, yes! If I see it on BRPG's thread I will immediately issue a writ.

driver - 15 Jun 2005 13:32 - 5988 of 27111

Chiva20 Re "ways of winning trust so he can cast doubt"
Yes you are right its all in here.

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/ShowPostList?fID=1&tID=5028

insiderinside - 15 Jun 2005 13:33 - 5989 of 27111


4 weeks to rollout is a good ploy to get people to hold over those horrific interims.

At most the only RNS due coming is either EGM announcement for the Biotec deal or to say the Biotec deal is going ahead with majority shareholder approval and then "by the way" trials good - salad lovely - chicken nice - pasta superb clear case of trying to market their products by way of an RNS - hoping a certain person sends the RNS to all the business wires to get them to print it - PR/Spin/marketing at its worst IMO. Orders news is needed - not yet more trial tosh being spread around - if its so good people would be buying it - less trial talk - more orders - and not a poxy 12 machine orders - big orders.

EWRobson - 15 Jun 2005 13:35 - 5990 of 27111

So ii sees the sp at either 4p or 50p in a year's time. Neither are credible! The downside is presumably Greenseal meeting ASDA's 200 but petering out with say a totla of 500 which would be an sp for Greensea of some 12.5p and perhaps overall sp of some 20p to allow for the other products. On the basis that the third trial is equally as poisitive as the first two and the US market is cracked on that basis, whether through Wal-Mart or one or more other majors, the total retrofits is unlikely to stop at 2000 (corresponding to an sp of 50p).

Agree with chiva, though, that ii should be treated with complete disdain. Greenseal is in the process of being launched and an exclusivity agreement has been negotiated with ASDA. The first part of this has involved three audited trials with different products and different suppliers. Very positive reports of progress have come from ASDA and the first order placed. This is part of a serious commercial process. The cry, 'they only have one order', is completely irrelevant and lacks any credibility whatsoever. He clutters this thread with his subversive babble. I am only responding at all so that the occasional visitor can also see him for what he is.

Eric

EWRobson - 15 Jun 2005 13:38 - 5991 of 27111

'Consistently volatile'. Like sd's CV - created for the job in hand. lol!

Super blue page but no price increase. Seems to bear out the view that MMs have a line of stock to sell.

Eric

ptholden - 15 Jun 2005 13:44 - 5992 of 27111

How much bloody stock have EVO got to sell at 22.62p?????????

pth

PS Rhetorical question!

pisces - 15 Jun 2005 13:52 - 5993 of 27111

You make me laugh ii,down 21% in last few weeks but up over 300% in last six months,puts pay to your drivel then.

EWRobson - 15 Jun 2005 15:15 - 5994 of 27111

pth: I assume you know that it is evo selling at 22.62. An hour and a quarter later they are still selling at the same price. Shows that they have a relatively long line of stock to dispose of with buys 2 million ahead of sells. Presumably part of the placing at 21.25p; 2 million at 1.37p is not a bad turn. Does seem to prove an overhang in the market which is holding the sp back. No sign of that 2.30p.m. RNS!

Eric

Chiva20 - 15 Jun 2005 15:17 - 5995 of 27111

Yep - annoying.

ptholden - 15 Jun 2005 15:19 - 5996 of 27111

Eric

Yep, EVO has been on the offer for most of the day (L2) on their own. Although I mentioned to Seq earlier that I didn't think those 44M shares would come into play short term, perhaps they have. MMs do not generally hold signficant amounts of stock, it just isn't in their best interests. So, yes, I think we now have an overhang situation; question is, how big is it? Hopefully some good news in the near future will see it shifted tout suite mon ami!

pth

bosley - 15 Jun 2005 15:56 - 5997 of 27111

eric, very strange... no 2.30pm rns.... unbelievable! pst, i've heard a rumour that there wont be an rns until there's news........

EWRobson - 15 Jun 2005 16:00 - 5998 of 27111

bos: Well, it may be that, like sd it meant 12 hours later, i.e. 2.30am! lol!

pth: Don't look on Evo as a typical MM. Seems hightly likely that they have taken a line of stock themselves and are moving it on in the amrket at an acceptable profit.

Eric

insiderinside - 15 Jun 2005 16:01 - 5999 of 27111

Interesting is it not - EVO write loads of very positive jam tomorrow reports - consistently wrong like their "we expect a stream of licenses in April 2005" - and now EVO seem able to sell loads of shares to buyers - where did they get those millions of shares from - has there been a placing at a low price recently ;-)

IMO this must be EVOs pay back IMO - if they average 2p gain on their buying price of those 44M new shares thats 44M x 0.02 = Profit of 880K pounds. Spread some around shares around (thats shows MM to MM trades - good for a ramp by some posters) to the other MMs so they can share in the profit of people buying into something that has no proven track record of acheiving anything other than loads of talk and no real revenue for the past three years and is based on "speculative" supposed savings - so its going to be party time at the brokers soon ;-)

What a wonderful money making dream Greenseal is turning out to be for the brokers and a nice fund raising theory for SE0 - those who got in below 20p are happy too - those in above 20p are either very unhappy or getting worried now.

stateside - 15 Jun 2005 16:02 - 6000 of 27111

Sorry folks

The rumour appears to have been generated by the comic 'Captain Guide' who appeared today on ADVFN's seo thread:

He later stated:

'I didn't promise any news at 2.30 today..i mentioned we will take off at 2.30 as news is round the corner maybe by Friday this week or next....saty on board with those beauties..you won't be disappointed..goodman'

The misprints are his.

We have not, so far, had an adverse reaction since 2.30 as was predicted on the ADVFN thread.

PS ii is on the ADVFN board daily de-ramping away with his verbal diarrhoea.
He is presumably posting elsewhere as well. He/she/it must be getting paid to do this?
Or is on an IT course on a ward for the criminally insane. Should taxpayers money really be wasted on he/she/it? (He/she/it would read better as He/she/s*it.)

statesidestateside

ptholden - 15 Jun 2005 16:12 - 6001 of 27111

Eric

Doesn't really matter if they are 'typical' or not mon ami, they have stock to shift and are holding up proceedings!! Not too worry, plenty of good still to come.

pth
Register now or login to post to this thread.