partridge
- 20 Feb 2007 16:08
Long term holder - excellent headline figures and nice divi increase. I do like to try to understand a bit about the companies I invest in, however and Barclays balance sheet has some lines which puzzle me. Their biggest asset is unsurprisingly "loans and advances to customers" 282BN, which even I can understand, but the next three biggest assets are "Trading Portfolio Assets" at 178BN, "Reverse Purchase Agreements and Cash collaterall on Securities Borrowed" at 174BN and "Derivative Financial Instruments" at 138BN. On the other side of the balance sheet are "Trading Portfolio liabilities" of 72BN, "Derivative Financial Instruments" at 140BN and "Repurchase Agreements and cash collateral on securities lent" at 137BN. With shreholders equity in the business of just 27BN these numbers seem uncomfortably large. Can anyone explain to me (with an example if possible) just what constitutes a typical item under each of these headings, as currently I have this vision of Nick Leeson being made to look a rank amateur?
sned
- 15 Aug 2007 18:41
- 6 of 12
hmmm! not exactly a profit unless I am missing something. Depends at what price the shares were initially bought at, if say 822 then NO profit. However, you are right, the Nick Leesons of this world would represent this as a profit ....
partridge
- 16 Aug 2007 09:39
- 7 of 12
One of us is missing something, sned, and not yet convinced it is me. On 14th August, Barclays collected 2.4BN in cash from new shares issued to overseas investors at price of 720p agreed some weeks ago (when Barclays price around that figure). To avoid any dilution for existing shareholders, it undertook to use that cash to buy back shares in the market for cancellation - net end result being that total shares in issue remains the same, but overseas investors replace some existing. My point is that the way things are going at present, Barclays will need considerably less than 2.4BN to buy back the same number of shares, so surely the surplus cash is a profit to them?
partridge
- 27 Aug 2007 14:00
- 8 of 12
Looking back at my first post in Feb 2007 and wondering if the recently departed Edward Cahill might soon have his own book to write!
partridge
- 28 Aug 2007 17:35
- 9 of 12
See BARC bought back another 4 million shares today for cancellation at 596p. Not bad, having sold them for 720p two weeks ago. Provides only a modicum of comfort against the steadily falling share price for long term holders such as me.
halifax
- 28 Aug 2007 18:02
- 10 of 12
The chinese wont be happy at present but when the sub prime scare fades away and Barclays shares reach 8 face will be restored!!
partridge
- 29 Aug 2007 16:58
- 11 of 12
Hoping that the press is right in that damage to Barc may be more reputational than financial. History suggests that memories short when the next good deal comes along
coeliac1
- 31 Aug 2007 10:13
- 12 of 12
Barc must be totally fed up with the press comments on the BOE funding. I expect they are running around the office to make sure there is no repeat.