Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Monterrico Metals Plc (MNA) (MNA)     

PapalPower - 21 Sep 2006 13:39

197791.gif20th Oct 2006 - Media Bid Comment : Link to Hemscott Article Click Here


197791.gif8th Oct 2006 - Mineweb Article : Link Click Here

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Size=283*18Chart.aspx?Provider=Intra&Code=MNA&Size=


Web Site : http://www.monterrico.co.uk

Major Shareholders :

Framlington 9.05%
ISIS Asset Mgmt PLC 8.44%
Raymond John Angus 5.59% (Director)
Lehman Brothers International (Europe) 5.40%
Christopher John Eager 4.96%
AMVESCAP PLC 4.56%
Frederic Zachary Haller 4.28% (Director)
Aviva PLC 3.50%
Allianz AG 3.08%

****************************

Broker Recommendations :

Fortis Private Inv Mgt 15-09-06 BUY
Collins Stewart 14-08-06 BUY
Hargreave Hale 18-05-06 BUY

***************************
Shares in Issue

26.31 million



big.chart?symb=uk%3Amna&compidx=aaaaa%3A

If the links do not auto open the player on clicking, then open WM or RP and then copy and paste the link into the "Open URL" function.


Interview With:
Richard Ralph CMG, CVO
Executive Chairman

Dated September 14, 2006


Listen with Windows Media - Link Below :
http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/uploaded_files/2006/September/14/wma/MonterricoMetalsPlc.wma

Listen with Real Player - Link Below :
http://www.wallstreetreporter.com/uploaded_files/2006/September/14/ram/MonterricoMetalsPlc.ram
______________________________________________

Director Trades :

Director Buys :

21/12/2005 R Angus BUY 10,000 @ 376p = 37.6K
21/12/2005 C Eager BUY 5,000 @ 376p = 18.8K
197791.gif20/09/2006 Frederick Haller BUY 10,000 @ 167p = 16.7K

PapalPower - 02 Nov 2006 10:03 - 60 of 160

Its still undervalued imo Big Al, even after the rise.

Arf Dysg - 02 Nov 2006 11:28 - 61 of 160

Share price up today. There's support out there.

Big Al - 02 Nov 2006 22:16 - 62 of 160

PP - may be, maybe not. Don't see it myself, but hey! ...... such is life in the market

;-)

Arf Dysg - 18 Nov 2006 19:48 - 63 of 160

If this does suffer from a takeover I'm going to go right off my trolley.

queen1 - 19 Nov 2006 14:11 - 64 of 160

Why "suffer" from a takeover Arf Dysg? Doesn't sound like too bad a strategy to me, dependant on the price obviously, especially if there's more than one interested party.

Arf Dysg - 19 Nov 2006 15:24 - 65 of 160

queen1, I was being ironic. What I'm actually doing is buying more, hoping that there WILL be a takeover. I reckon that the net present value of the mine is 12 pounds a share. This goes up a bit if they borrow money from the banks instead of paying for the mine infrastructure costs immediately. 12 pounds a share assumes a very low copper price, around $1.50/lb. Every $0.10/lb increase on the copper price adds 3 pounds sterling per share to the net present value.

The feasibility study, out any day now, should clarify things.

PapalPower - 19 Nov 2006 16:22 - 66 of 160

It was planned for December, but if it slipped a month or two it should not make any difference.

queen1 - 20 Nov 2006 17:43 - 67 of 160

Fair enough Arf Dysg. 12 a share would be lovely but a little rich I feel. A takeout price around 5 though shouldn't be out of the question.

Arf Dysg - 22 Nov 2006 16:00 - 68 of 160

December would be nice but I'd still be happy with a little new year present.
5 a share would value the company at 130m. That really isn't much considering the likely yearly output of copper.

Suppose the mine capital cost is half a billion pounds, that means there's only a fraction of that left over for the shareholders. I suggest that if the value of the mine (in today's money) is only slightly greater than the capital cost, margins are thin enough that the whole enterprise is dubious. I think margins are a lot better than that.

Big Al - 22 Nov 2006 21:40 - 69 of 160

If even a fiver was in the offing, I'd really expect this to be trading at higher levels than this.

12 is sheer fantasy IMO

queen1 - 23 Nov 2006 12:39 - 70 of 160

Fair points both. I'm sure the market will lead the way eventually.

soul traders - 30 Nov 2006 18:44 - 71 of 160

Shares Mag of 26th Oct quotes Seymour Pierce as saying that a bid is likely to be around 403p a share.

Which is only 107 mil and seems cheap to me.

however, if the market is only valuing the co at 67 mil, then the likelihood of a half-billion pound takeover seems a bit reomote to say the least.

Will be interesting to see if the BFS has an effect on the SP. Might have a pop at this if I can free up some cash.

Big Al - 30 Nov 2006 20:10 - 72 of 160

st - see my post 69.

There are always those in the know and on the day of announcment the price didn't even threaten 4. That says it all IMO.

soul traders - 01 Dec 2006 12:53 - 73 of 160

Big Al, you have to admit that the "announcement" was couched in the vaguest of terms and concerned a "very preliminary" bid approach.

So less of a bid, more of an expression of interest. Surely one would expect the SP to go a lot higher if i.) the JORC/BFS was in place; ii.) the bid was looking a lot more serious and real money was actually being mentioned.

I think 5 a share, or 140 mil, for this co would be pretty cheap.

WDIK, but would be interested to hear others' thoughts.

queen1 - 01 Dec 2006 13:08 - 74 of 160

Good news considering the recent political instability in the region recently:

Monterrico Metals said the government of Peru confirmed the legal title held by Montericco unit Minera Majaz SA over the surface rights of the Rio Blanco project, a copper-molybdenum deposit situated in northern Peru.

The company said it is now beginning the development phase of the project, following complertion of exploration at Henry's Hill. Monterrico added it will be applying to the Ministry of Energy and Mines for the Environmental Impact Assessment permit needed to construct and operate the mine.

FWIW I now think that 5 would be cheap as well.

Terropol - 14 Dec 2006 17:26 - 75 of 160

Only question of time on this one....

Big Al - 15 Dec 2006 08:11 - 76 of 160

Not what the price action continues to say, unfortunately.

soul traders - 15 Dec 2006 12:40 - 77 of 160

Al, do you mean this price action? MNA Bid: 260p Offer: 266p Change: 11.5

Big Al - 15 Dec 2006 13:29 - 78 of 160

I meant overall since the initial news on possible takeover - it's gone down ever since. I'm afraid today hardly makes up for it.

;-)

queen1 - 15 Dec 2006 16:20 - 79 of 160

It's not exactly "gone down ever since" Big Al. It's actually fluctuated quite a bit. And back in August it was down at 180p so although we've retraced from 320p over the last few weeks there's been a definate improvement.
Register now or login to post to this thread.