The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Tabatha

The only cretins around here are those who refused to see where this was heading and unfortuntely that includes you.

Why is it several posters here saw this train wreck coming and others didn't? Think about it. We were all reading the same releases. It does not surprise me there is an attempt to make a distinction on moral grounds and pigeon-hole folk. Holders preferred to abuse those calling the bear position rather than properly answer the questions. Who's immoral? Mute point IMO.


I also notice neither of Hil's very valid posts have been even acknowledged. A bull reply would be nice.

Aha, there's one now. ;-))

Bouncyyou post the same crap over and over againI have been embezzled.nothing to do with myself not listening to you viewwhy the fu*k would I want to?.I live an idyllic lifeyou work on bouncy castlesI live in the SOF 2 months of the yearyou post on here 24/7.I have a growing portfolioyou invested in banks.self admissionI am good looking debonairwith a beautiful wife and familyyoure a cnut!

Chilli,

I hope for your sake that is the end of the story.

A petitioner can apply to the court for an order that the petition be withdrawn provided, amongst other things, they can satisfy the court that the petition had not been previously advertised. Why, if Trevillion had already reached an agreement with MDX as MDX have claimed, did he then proceed to advertise the petition instead of applying to withdraw it? As I say, it's only MDX who are saying they've reached an agreement. I do hope that they really have reached an agreement, but as things stand there is a possibility which can't be discounted that Trevillion is still going for the jugular.

Why don't you ring Trevillion's lawyers to find out for yourself what their stance is. Don't tell them you're an investor, but instead make out that you're a creditor and say you are thinking of supporting the petition. That's what I'd do.

Hilaryit has been rns that both legal parties agreed to the revised figurethat is fact the condition on meldex part was the winding-up petition had to been withdrawn prior to being publicized in the London Gazetteit appears to me that RT went against his legal advisors in order to invite others? [his cake and eat it]he has no chance of succeeding now.. imholets beg to differ..

Jeffdouble post on the Bull.to answer your questionyour view on the comments about RT.I think he is talking like he has just eaten ten vindaloos on the bouncefrom the end of December 2007 and a good part of early 2008... he was looking after his wife who was hospitalised and very ill and then soon after or concurrently.. his son became ill and entered a comadid his mum then get taken by a terrorist organisation and forced to make love to Bin Ladenhis dad turned into a transvestite and died when his spandex jumpsuit exploded while playing with himself watching an Eddie Izzard dvd ffshe is responsible for the rns that went outmillions were invested on those statements that he signed offthe man is dead and buried and hes squirming like a toadBarry will not be beatenand some of you on here will eventually understand that
The second Bull post explained his position!

Tabby
I wouldnt like to think that someone would make something like that up but you know more about RT than me.

Chilli,

I'm not here with an ulterior motive. I'm just pointing out an alternative viewpoint. I'm sure that you will continue to make your own decisions.

As examples of that alternative viewpoint:

"it has been rns that both legal parties agreed to the revised figure"

it has been rns that MDX has agreed to a revised figure

"the condition on meldex part was the winding-up petition had to been withdrawn"

With a winding-up position having been presented, under what circumstances exactly are MDX in any position to impose conditions? It seems to me that it's a straight choice of cough up or tits up.

"it appears to me that RT went against his legal advisors"

Trevillion pays his advisors. They take his instructions and do as he tells them. It's simple.

"he has no chance of succeeding now"

It seems to me that as he's already been paid around 1/3 of his claim, he might feel that he's already suceeded. And if MDX want to stay afloat they'll have to either stump up another 50k or reach an agreement with him.

I only do black and white, Chilli. I'm not interested in fancy tints.

Tabby , I can't be ar*ed to look but when RT called IFRS accounting standards "nonesense" I laid into him and his take on the companies prospects.

My guess without looking back is you (and possibly scottie) laid into me and RT and results were best thing since sliced bread.

From someone who is never wrong (your words) why is everyone picking on him now ... death threats etc ???

Just a thought but are you Mufprat tabby ?

Respect.

You've not been embezzled, Tabatha, you've been stupid.

tabasco - 21 Jan 2009 17:22 - 6044 of 6051
Bouncyyou post the same crap over and over againI have been embezzled.nothing to do with myself not listening to you viewwhy the fu*k would I want to?.I live an idyllic lifeyou work on bouncy castlesI live in the SOF 2 months of the yearyou post on here 24/7.I have a growing portfolioyou invested in banks.self admissionI am good looking debonairwith a beautiful wife and familyyoure a cnut!


Work life is a choice, my friend. Also self admitted I was way premature and stopped out of banking long ago (unlike you, Feckwit) - you always forget that curcila bit of info, don't you? I'll also bet you're one ugly SOB.

Why do you have this constant need to blow your own trumpet. You screwed up royally. At least be honest with yourself. We know you'll not be honest on here. ;-))))))

Good afternoon all>

Bouncybecause I like the tune!
Dilare you Mufprat tabby.the names a total contradiction.as I have never been a contradictionNo!
Regarding your other point DilI was given a great deal of info subsequently from the post you mentionedI am up to 150 pages+ of misdemeanours on my file of the miscreant RT ..believe me I am on the right side.you take whatever side you wishwithout a financial interest the choice becomes easy

I post information by The Bull on these bbs because I believe his comments to be honest and open mindedto my knowledge he is the only person that is currently talking with Barry/Garry and TLFBT on behalf of the pis..

The Bull - 22 Jan'09 - 13:12 - 41468 of 41489


figure6 - 22 Jan'09 - 11:23 - 41428 of 41455


RT has been very dodgy, infact his actions (RNSs) may be criminal.He is desperate to avoid the legal consequences of his actions and is looking for any way out.

figure - I chose my most unfortnate advfn name back in 1999 maybe 2000 when that tech rally was going on. Have lived with 8-9 years of bear hell since then.

This may provoke some strong reaction, but I got the distinct impression from RT that he blames Barry for a lot to do with the companies woes because of the timing of his bid which was never genuine (not my words) and was only designed to stop the company from raising more money for an imminent aquisition as part of his growth strategy.

I asked suggested that I had heard rumours that he had encouraged a bid and he denied this and said the whole offer period was very damaging to the company. I said that I had heard that money could be raised during an offer period so why should it be damaging and if it could not be raised, why were we in an offer period for so long and those bidders told to withdraw.

He said that money could not be raised unless you could prove to potem that that this/these offers were frustrating capital raising. He used some terminology which utilised the word frustrating in, I cannot exactly remember the phrase. He said Potem refused the request which I find extraorinary.

I am not a mouthpiece for RT, I am simply trying to make some more sense of what has been going on and am trying to remain open minded. For what it's worth I retract nothing from my long post yesterday and believe Barry is a Top fella and I hope our trust in him is well rewarded. I am not going to blindly trust anyone though and am prepared to listen. I have suffered horrendous losses these past 8 years but fortunately have a business that is doing ok. If Meldex fails, I reckon it will cost me another 10 years on my working life unless I get lucky elsewhere

Tabby
He is almost forced to come out with something like that with one or two muppets accusing him of being fed a few lines by RT. He sounds honest and genuine shame a few like to take pops.

Does your inside info give you any idea what to expect from the update tomorrow?

JeffThe bull is getting our full support...please dont get naughty againdid I mention inside info?please assist and post that quote.
My guess is meldex will forcefully defend the winding-up petition without further challenge from TLFBT

On the ball with the update tabby ... same old MDX.

"My guess is meldex will forcefully defend the winding-up petition without further challenge from TLFBT "


Your wish, more like. All rosy yet again? ;-))

Nothing like working on the fly

fortunatus - 23 Jan'09 - 11:46 - 41823 of 41860
Just spoken to Mr. Muncaster who told me re. the interim status report that he was "sitting here doing it right now".

"Dear Muppets ....."

lol