Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

If he is ornery, I would think he will feel at home in the tory party.

indeed, just as does dennis skinner :-)

SNP to escalate battle for Commons front bench amid fury at Labour's 'absolutely pathetic' behaviour

SNP ready to order MPs into Parliament for 7am and block Labour committee appointments if Dennis Skinner's side does not back down in seats row



Nicola and the wee beasties




By Ben Riley-Smith, Political Correspondent

5:30PM BST 03 Jun 2015



The SNP is threatening a major escalation in its battle over a Commons front bench after branding Labour's refusal to hand over the seats "absolutely pathetic".


It is understood the leadership is willing to order MPs to get into Parliament at 7am and block Labour appointments on Commons committees if the row is not resolved.


"If they want to play silly games, we'll play silly games", a senior figure told this newspaper after admitting to being "f***ing furious" with Labour's attitude.


It comes with half a dozen Labour backbenchers – led by veteran Labour MP Dennis Skinner – continuing to refuse to give up their front bench seats in the Commons to the SNP.


There is anger among the SNP that despite getting official third party status in Westminster Labour is refusing to fully vacate the second opposition front bench.



the other beast



more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/SNP/11649598/SNP-to-escalate-battle-for-Commons-front-bench-amid-fury-at-Labours-absolutely-pathetic-behaviour.html

I see that Jeremy Corbyn is running for the Labour leadership. I hope he wins as he would be even more unelectable than Michael Foot, Neil Kinnock and Ed Milband.

Max,

Start counting the u-turns of this U-bend government from now.

At the end of its period in "office", I think it will make FIFA look like a charity!

Tony Blair has denied reports he refused to speak at a world hunger conference because the organizers refused to pay him a £330,000 fee.

The former prime minister’s office said there had been no negotiations over how much he would earn.

Blair’s strong denial comes after an anonymous source told the Mail talks broke down over the speaking engagement because the event’s sponsors refused to pay the fee.

A senior figure at Eat, the British food chain sponsoring the hunger conference, confirmed the deal had fallen through because the fee was too high.

The controversial former Labour leader allegedly demanded £330,000 as a donation to his wife Cherie’s charity when approached by the Kruger Crowne talent agency.

The conference paid former US President Bill Clinton £327,000 to speak last year, but intimated Blair was not worth a similar sum, according to the Mail.

“Blair is just not Clinton, and even his star power is fast diminishing,” a source told the Mail.

“So for his talent reps to think Eat was going to pay massive bucks for him shows they overestimated his worth. My impression of the asking price is it was way beyond what he was worth for Eat. Blair is also controversial. His background and history as prime minister is controversial because of the role he played in Iraq.

“Some people don’t like his past, so when the forum organizers took that and the asking price into account, they decided to make do without him,” the source added.

Eat’s executive producer, Odd Arvid Stromstad, confirmed the fee was too high for the company to pay.

Stromstad told the Mail: “We were in contact but the fee they wanted was quite high, so we didn’t want to go into it.”

Tony Blair’s office strongly denied the allegations.

A spokesperson said in a statement: “We have never had any contact with this talent agency and they were not acting on our behalf.

“They approached the Cherie Blair Foundation for Women out of the blue, representing Eat, and all of their contacts were with the Foundation.

“They asked if Mr Blair would give the keynote speech in exchange for a donation to the Foundation, but Mr Blair was unable to do so because prior commitments meant it would be logistically impossible. This is the reason why he can’t attend,” they added.

Blair has come under scrutiny in recent years for his multimillion pound property portfolio and lucrative consultancy fees.

Some of Blair’s controversial clients include the government of Kazakhstan, which stands accused of human rights abuses.

I really do love you mummy!




UGGGH!

Fred take note .....................................

Talks go on and on ........

Iran And Six World Powers Start New Round Of Nuclear Deal Drafting
Thu, 4th Jun 2015 11:43

Vienna (Alliance News) - Senior diplomats from Iran and six major powers met on Thursday in Vienna to tackle remaining disagreements over the text of a planned nuclear deal that would bring Iran back into the international fold.

They have less than four weeks until their deadline to finalize the deal that would force Iran to curb its nuclear activities and accept intrusive inspections, in return for the lifting of sanctions.

What inspectors will be allowed to see, and how fast sanctions will be lifted, have emerged as two sticking points.

Tehran's negotiators are unhappy about inspections of military sites, which may have been used in the past for developing nuclear weapons parts, according to International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) findings.

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in Vienna that the issue would be tackled at this round.
"The talks are tough and complicated, but we still have a few weeks to go," he told Iranian state broadcaster IRIB.

While Britain, China, France, Russia, the US and Germany are worried that Iran could use its civilian nuclear facilities to make nuclear weapons material, Tehran says such suspicions are based on flawed Western intelligence.
Ending the long-standing nuclear dispute could also end Iran's diplomatic isolation and would make it easier for other powers to seek Iranian help in easing regional tensions.

not half as worried as israel!
however, realpolitik says that a deal needs to be done with iran for all sorts of reasons, oil of course being one of the more important

Any chance of curbing Israel's nuclear programme. They have had nuclear weapons since 1966.

ah well, those are defensive only :-)
to be fair, israel has been under very real and considerable threat for many decades, though some of that is self-inflicted, but assuredly far from all

Peace be upon you...or else!

fred that is not funny its sick

Is Cameron using hard working tax payers' money for tory party political ends?

This would appear misuse of the public purse.



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33017307

TORY POLITICS

PM's EU negotiations of no significance - Lord Lawson

Lord Lawson tells Newsnight's Laura Kuenssberg: "He's looking for more... but what [David Cameron] will secure will be trivial"

David Cameron is unlikely to achieve anything of significance as he seeks to renegotiate the UK's EU membership, former Chancellor Lord Lawson has said.
The Eurosceptic Conservative peer said the prime minister's efforts probably will not deliver "fundamental change".



Lord Lawson told BBC Newsnight the PM promised to hold an in/out referendum "largely" to keep the Tories together.

Speaking on the eve of the anniversary of the 1975 referendum, he feels the UK will vote to stay in and "regret it".

Lord Lawson said: "I think it's likely that the changes that David Cameron will secure will be inconsequential, of no significance at all.... but given the authority he has and the lack of a credible opposition leader I think it will be the same result."
He added there "isn't anybody" he can see who would be an effective leader of the campaign for an EU exit.
'Outside chance'

Last week, the prime minister began meeting European leaders as he tried to gather support for changes he wants before holding the UK's EU membership referendum, a vote which is to take place by the end of 2017.

Tighter rules on migrants' benefits are a priority for the Conservatives, as they want to control immigration from the EU.

Mr Cameron also wants an opt-out from the EU pledge of "ever closer union" and more influence for national parliaments over European laws.
Lord Lawson told Newsnight there was "a very small outside chance that he might achieve something of significance" but it was more likely to be "trivial".
He added that "in the short term, the next few years the PM will have bought peace in the Tory party".

David Cameron and Francois Hollande in Paris on 28 May 2015

Mr Cameron has held a series of meetings with European leaders
On Wednesday, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said she was confident conditions can be created for the UK to stay in the EU.
"It's not about losing sleep over this, but about doing our work and creating the necessary preconditions for Britain to remain in the EU," she told the BBC.
Mrs Merkel said: "There are other points where we have a different opinion, but we have always been able also to pursue a Europe at different speeds, to find opt-out solutions for example."

Meanwhile, a survey for think tank British Future suggests most people have still not made up their minds on which way to vote in the referendum.

So which do you prefer?

The official refreshed (ie. revised last month) London Underground Map:



Or the 'unofficial Designer Unknown (but he/she is called "SameBoat") Tube Map as uploaded to Wikipedia back in August 2014.
PS. Notice the lovely curves in it. Also notice CrossRail and also future line extensions:



If you would like to look at more London underground information, go to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_map