bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
paulmasterson1
- 16 Jun 2005 22:16
- 6108 of 27111
We are here, at the start of the Greenseal and Frogpack boomtime.
Cheers,
PM
PSLeon
- 16 Jun 2005 22:35
- 6109 of 27111
PM or any one in the know
I am fairly new to this
Can you give me a clue as to why the placement have only from 13th June to the 20th to be made?
Is this the norm??
bosley
- 16 Jun 2005 22:58
- 6110 of 27111
psl, there was a similar condition with the last placing. everything eventually sorted itself out and up we went. i expect the same once all the tees have been crossed and the eyes dotted.
bosley
- 16 Jun 2005 23:00
- 6111 of 27111
sambal, if that is what you think, then why are you still here?
PSLeon
- 16 Jun 2005 23:05
- 6112 of 27111
Thanks bosley
Hopefully we should see lift off again as of Monday
We are in long
Good luck to all who hold
EWRobson
- 16 Jun 2005 23:18
- 6113 of 27111
I am out for the day (at the airport picking up my daughter from Vancouver, not playing golf) and come back to confusion reigning. I saw touching mention of the need for Uncle Eric so here he is.
What is the projected order book for SEO? We have forecasts of 10 units and 27K. Some justification for the latter whereas the lowest reasonable effort is the published expectation from ASDA of 200 and probably the KBC Peel Hunt hosue broker figure of 1000, supporting an sp of 25p. I would assume that no-one takes anything that ii says seriously: but any product has low sales as the early risk-taking buyers are prepared to take the risk for competitive advantage; the key point is the gradient reached as the economic-S curve takes effect. We don't know what that is yet although PM is quoting what Howard White would like it to be. What we can say is that as time passes, the prospects are improving - the news today re Wal-Mart 'trials booked' the latest example. I am comfortable with a figure of 5000 which is a sort of geometric mean (I think) between 1000 and 27000, and implies an sp of 1.25.
But how do we take the Shares quote? First, aldwickk qustions whether that shouldn't have come out first in an RNS: I would say that meetings and even trials are part of the on-going commercial operations and you do not have an RNS about everything that happens, even contracts awarded. Second, John Marshall produced the last significant Shares article on SEO: whenever you read a JM Play it states (i) that the author holds shares in the company; (ii) it includes something significant that he has gleaned from talking to his contacts in the company. The actual piece this week is not written by JM but it has his imprint; i.e. he is aware that Wal-Mart are actively evaluating Greenseal to the point of having trials conducted at suppliers. Indeed, it would be surprising if this was not happening. My view is that the picture is unfolding over a period of a year or so and the key point is that NO SIGNIFICANT GLITCH HAS SO FAR OCCURRED. The further we go down the line the risk of the potential not being achieved (say the 5000 machine forecast at quoted prices) becomes lower and lower.
The heavy buying today and the ease of the placement would appear to confirm this as a very general view. Note that the MACD graph above is heavily distorted by the trade transactions. I am actually happier to have the current well-supported price than the somewhat euphoric sp of a month ago.
Eric
stockdog
- 17 Jun 2005 00:45
- 6114 of 27111
Shares said nothing that was not contained in the RNS abot the purchase of Biotec and the share placing, but nice to see it more widely disseminated.
I like the geometric mean - very sophisticated eric - especially as is suggests an SP which seems within reach inside a year.
Sambal, bos - sorry about the burbling on about 6m shares - just filling in the gaps with twaddle between real news.
Sambal if you don't know where we are, you're in the wrong share and the wrong website and should warp drive too a new universe. You can't move for driver and pm ramming information about the inside legleg measurement of the latest frogpackpack down your greengreen seal. All of it is a screaming buybuy and hold, but always DYORDYOR, of coursecourse.
Has anyone noticednoticed how catcatching a certainain posterter's style isis? Sorrysorry to repeatpeat mymy self soso muchmuch.
nightnight
stockstockdogdog
bosley
- 17 Jun 2005 08:18
- 6115 of 27111
morning all. got a few hours to kill before we go on holiday for a week of lying down in the sun. no news.
sd, what do we do now!!!! free trial is over!! no more terminal!! no more level 2!!! back to 30 seconds of stockwatch!! bugger!! anyway, i hope you can find a cure or seek counselling for insiderstatesideritis!! horrible virus. i'm gladglad i'm going to be away before it infectfects me. oh nono! i thinkthink i'm becomingcoming infectedinfected tooooooooo!!!!!!
stockdog
- 17 Jun 2005 08:34
- 6116 of 27111
I've got a couple more days on my free trial level 2. Then I do have an hours free access to streaming prices/trades via Digital Look, but it's not quite the same.
Have a great holiday - seo yow whin yow git back, as they say in Birmingham. We'll look after the thread and the SP for you.
sd
bosley
- 17 Jun 2005 08:39
- 6117 of 27111
flamin' better 'ad doo, cock!! as they say in bolton. went long on wed, now facing the "baza" conundrum.
insiderinside
- 17 Jun 2005 09:09
- 6118 of 27111
Morning - tired today so not many posts from me - just a summary that EVO and KBC will be very happy for the SEO Shares Mag mention - distorted and ramped on BBs - as it has helped them clear the overhang and get better prices.
The trend of the tips appears to be going negative - IC said the price was high enough at 23p - Shares Mag inclines in the last comment to "take profits" - EVO downgraded from Buy to Add - RHPS did not even mention any update on SEO yesterday - IMO they are all considering options - its a very rough time ahead for SEO with loss at interims and the very strong chance the Biotec deal (another loss making company) will severely take money out of SE0 to keep it going and pay off their debts and losses.
Still no significant orders on the horizon and only talk of trials which in themselves cost SE0 money and drag them further into the red.
No news Monday could well mean a very rough week ahead for SEO SP.
jimmy b
- 17 Jun 2005 09:12
- 6119 of 27111
Actually Shares Mag didn't say take profits,,they have SEO as a buy , they said cautious investors may want to lock in gains,as the shares have risen 500%...... Give both sides of the story.
insiderinside
- 17 Jun 2005 09:20
- 6120 of 27111
jimmy b - a tip mag does not go halfway for no reason - what they say means what they incline.
If RHPS puts a share on the "watch list" everyone buys it without it being a buy - if it goes wrong no one can blame RHPS. If they say hold or "you might want to take profits" it means they think its the best time to exit but do not want to say sell as yet.
The next comment if it goes down will be "well we advised to lock in profits and since then - "
Any tipster - watch list or positive commment means weak buy - negative comment or take profits means weak sell - thats IMO.
hewittalan6
- 17 Jun 2005 09:22
- 6121 of 27111
Major buying signal on YOO. insiderinside has started rubbishing them!!! Get in now for a quick buck (LOL). I should laugh. I already hold the buggers!!
Alan
insiderinside
- 17 Jun 2005 09:23
- 6122 of 27111
TTFN - might see a dip today and into red by the end of trading IMO.
jimmy b
- 17 Jun 2005 09:29
- 6123 of 27111
17 Jun'05 - 09:20 - 6119 of 6121 insiderinside
jimmy b - a tip mag does not go halfway for no reason - what they say means what they incline.
And the main heading was BUY !!!it doesn't really matter, but don't try and distort what people are actually looking at..
wilbs
- 17 Jun 2005 09:32
- 6124 of 27111
If a share makes gain like that then IMHO its common sence to top slice and let the profits run for a free ride.
'BUY' meany 'BUY' ii.
wilbs
bosley
- 17 Jun 2005 09:32
- 6125 of 27111
ii,
"just a summary that EVO and KBC will be very happy for the SEO Shares Mag mention - distorted and ramped on BBs -"
well you certainly did your best to distort it!! as jimmy says, the last line is
"cautious investors could lock in some profits ,as the shares have risen 500%"
at the top of the "offending" article is a big green arrow head pointing up and the word "buy" over it. seo was and is a risky buy, which is why shares mag say "cautious investors". nowhere does it say sell. please stop being a prick.
stockdog
- 17 Jun 2005 09:35
- 6126 of 27111
No, wilbs, he'll never understand you unless you speak his language.
BUY means nothing to him - it's BUYBUY, or in my case byebye ii - he's still squelchelched.
ssdd (or is it sdsd?)
bhunt1910
- 17 Jun 2005 09:37
- 6127 of 27111
Well I see that HE is back again judging by the comment - and he certainly succeeds in winding us up doesn't he - just ignore him - by all means read his stuff - 'cos I guess there must be a semblance of truth there somewhere - but best just to ignore him and not respond. Now did someone say he was rubbishing Yoo - better get acrosss there and buy some then
Have a good hol Bos - expect they will be up by the time u return.
Baza