Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

A man who saw his new wife for the first time without make up is reportedly SUING her for trauma, after being shocked at her appearance.

The unnamed couple had just got married in Algeria and after spending the night together, the husband woke up to find his wife bare faced.

But rather than admire her natural beauty, instead the man REFUSED to believe the woman was his wife, believing her to be a thief.

Finally realising that this was in fact the woman he loved, the man is now allegedly suing her for fraud and “psychological suffering”.

A source told Emirates 247: “He said he was deceived by her as she used to fill up her face with make up before their marriage.

“He said she looked very beautiful and attractive before marriage, but when he woke up in the morning and found that she had washed the make-up off her face, he was frightened as he thought she was a thief.”

The price of the husband’s “suffering” is £13,000.

Aaaaw. Little love.

Obviously, as well as issuing her a writ for this cruel deception, he needs to walk around her at least three times, saying "Thou art an ugly cow and I divorce thee." Job done.

I suppose, that rather than admire her natural beauty, he looked across the bed and quickly cottoned on to the fact she must have been using tons of slap and lippy as a single lass. Neither did he know, realise or remember, that one does not tend to look at the mantle-piece whilst poking the fire.

Nothing was mentioned about taking our her false teeth and putting them in a glass, putting her hearing aid and her glasses on the bedside table and leaning her false leg up against the wall - all before hopping(???) into bed.

Hmmm? Hey! I didn't know, that in Algeria, you can sue your wife for trauma.

Amazing, eh? On t'Internet, you learn something every day; in fact every hour.

Dunno, funny things can happen.

I've woken up with a few dogs that wouldn't have got the time of day if sober.

Do they think the same?

Probably :-(

Another so called hunter been posted on Face book today posing with a dead lion, asking for people to name him. Big fat German slob by the look of him.

http://scambroker.com/ez-trader/

Another one of these binary brokers , any thoughts about them ?

.

We are all in it together for hard working people!

Same type of individuals are gathered around Putin!

Alders,

Tell me please. If you had to choose between an unregulated broker in Cyprus which was probably owned by either Russians or Arabs, and a fully regulated broker in London or Australia, offering government backed segregation of client funds, which would you choose?

Why are they allowed to promote these in the UK , you can't advertise pyramid selling here , in the US they seem to be able to make any claims they like, from get rich quick scam's to cure all types of diseases scam's

It depends on the regulations and regulators.

A recent meeting at No 10?

I have been using Windows 10 for a few days now and it is a big improvement over Win 8. Apart from being more user friendly, it is more stable. I've noticed my laptop runs much quieter.

The last time I checked, Alders, Cyprus was still in the EU. Free trade is the expression, I believe.

But, as it happens, the US are very strict when it comes to financial services regulation. They require more margin, they banned hedging, they impose FIFO, and US citizins are not allowed to use offshore brokers. And if you're an offshore broker caught selling to US citizens, the yanks will have you extradited and thrown in the slammer.

itur,

Have you had any conflicts with any software or setups?

Are you running microsoft office and if so which version?


Thinking about upgrading but hate having to relearn old tricks.

May wait until the "bugs" are sorted out by the more adventurous!

Tony Blair should face trial for war crimes over Iraq, says Jeremy Corbyn
Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Tony Blair should be tried for war crimes
The Labour leadership candidate was discussing the 2003 Iraq invasion
He said conflict was an 'illegal war' and questioned delay of Chilcot report
Labour splits widened after Corbyn's union backers attacked Blairite 'virus'
Blair told members to 'get a transplant' if their heart wanted to back Corbyn

FRED YOUR HERO

aneurin bevan and jimmy reid are more to the liking of fred

i can fully understand an admiration for the former, albeit that i would not agree with his views, but not much time for the latter

Tanker
That was NOT what Corbyn said. I saw the quote and he replied to the question by saying, "if he has committed war crimes then he should be prosecuted". That is very different from what you posted. His reply was a general one and applies to anyone.

Not so, Haystack.

Amazingly, but true, I fear Tanker is perfectly correct on this one:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/11784095/Tony-Blair-should-stand-trial-for-war-crimes-over-Iraq-invasion-Jeremy-Corbyn-says.html