goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 06 Aug 2015 11:07
- 61919 of 81564
MrT and others ...... i am sure there's an awful lot more than simple misuse of funds
Fred1new
- 06 Aug 2015 11:32
- 61920 of 81564
JB,
Personally, I didn't like Blair in 1997. I thought him intelligent, egotistical and more interested in his own future history and personal success. I thought him as shallow and measuring his own success on hanging onto power, rather than utilizing the “power” he had for general benefit. (Similar in personality to Cameron’s. Both rely on media sound bites and popular generalisations.)
I didn't like the way he followed Maggie Thatcher in the way he formed a "presidential" form of government, as Cameron is concreting into the present government. I prefer more collegial form of government, rather than follower the leader government
I thought he should have regulated the "city" and "financial" services, rather than run after them as Osborne is repeating.
I thought he was wrong in following Bush into Iraq. (So was IDS, and a horde of "knowledgeable" tories. (Misled? But followed by knowledgeable IDS and large parts of the tory party.)
I would like to see Blair defend himself in court of law against the Iraq Crimes?
But unfortunately probably his decisions were based on “judgement” and I doubt that he would be found “guilty” of any crime.
But it might be salutary to others, to consider going to war.
PS . I would like to have seen Thatcher tried for the sinking of Belgrano, which many consider to be an act of Murder.
(Check the cost of the Falkland’s war.)
jimmy b
- 06 Aug 2015 11:39
- 61921 of 81564
Good on you Fred your right Blair was a parasite , Don't forget the Argies were invading OUR islands >>
aldwickk
- 06 Aug 2015 12:09
- 61922 of 81564
How much as Bob Geldoff made from his offshore companys with the contact's he has got with African head of states ? How much tax does he pay in the UK
cynic
- 06 Aug 2015 12:22
- 61923 of 81564
an interesting point about the belgrano, but i guess if you're at war, "being shot while running away" might be deemed justified, just as was the fire-bombing of dresden and then hiroshima
as for relying on the media and similar, it is just a fact of modern life in all its guises and you'll just have to get used to it
had it been otherwise, it is unlikely ronnie reagan would have been elected and, had it been in this era, then douglas-home wouldn't have stood a snowball's
Fred1new
- 06 Aug 2015 12:25
- 61924 of 81564
JB,
Forgot!
The Falklands only 8000 miles from Nelson Column, just down the road from Buck Palace!
Bloody barmy, expensive ego trip for a failing Prime minister.
Fred1new
- 06 Aug 2015 12:27
- 61925 of 81564
an interesting point about the belgrano, but i guess if you're at war, "being shot while running away" might be deemed justified, just as was the fire-bombing of dresden and then hiroshima
Generally considered amoral!
Haystack
- 06 Aug 2015 12:35
- 61926 of 81564
I suppose we never sunk any German warships in WWII that were steaming away. Far better to let them head towards you and start an attack. And I guess we never used submarines to sunk warships without giving them a warning first. The Belgrano was a warship which was part of an enemy force. The alternative was to wait till it attacked us first. If it was not a beligerant then why was it at sea with hundreds on board?
cynic
- 06 Aug 2015 12:42
- 61927 of 81564
war and morals make interesting bedfellows of course, and amoral is always just an observer
any comment about dresden and hiroshima?
Haystack
- 06 Aug 2015 12:45
- 61928 of 81564
Britain received international criticism after the sinking after the Argentine Junta announced that the warship had been returning to its home port and was outside the 200 mile exclusion zone imposed by Whitehall.
But Major David Thorp, who spent 34 years working as a signals expert in military intelligence, has disclosed for the first time that he was asked to carry out a trawl of all the intelligence on the sinking at the direct request of Margaret Thatcher a few months after the end of the war.
He was ordered to compile a report for the Prime Minister called “The Sinking of the Belgrano” that has never been published.
From his own signals intercepts and those from other Government agencies, he proved that the Argentine cruiser was heading into the exclusion zone.
Major Thorp was in charge of a top secret signals interception section hidden on the amphibious warship Intrepid as it steamed with the Task Force.
Around Ascension Island, 4,000 miles from the Falklands, his team began picking up naval communications sent to the Argentine fleet which they were easily able to decipher.
The report states that in late April 1982, they intercepted a message sent from naval headquarters ordering the Belgrano and its escorts to a grid reference within the exclusion zone and not back to base as the Argentines later claimed.
The Belgrano was sunk by two torpedoes fired by the hunter-killer submarine Conqueror on May 2 with the loss of 323 lives a number of miles outside the exclusion zone.
“For some reason they decided on a rendezvous point still within the exclusion zone,” Major Thorp said. “Whether they were trying to raise a thumb at us I don’t know. At the time I thought it was strange thinking why didn’t they go straight into port?”
In his new book, The Silent Listener, Major Thorp wrote: “The findings of my final report stated the destination of the vessel was not to her home port as the Argentine Junta stated but the objective of the ship was to relocate to a prearranged RV within the exclusion zone.”
Despite the report being read by Mrs Thatcher she never disclosed the information either in Parliament or elsewhere possibly because she did not want to reveal Britain’s eavesdropping capabilities.
But during her infamous BBC exchange with the schoolteacher Diana Gould who confronted her on the sinking Mrs Thatcher made an intriguing reference to the report saying: "One day, all of the facts, in about 30 years time, will be published." Mrs Gould died earlier this month.
In recent years the Argentine navy has accepted that the sinking of the Belgrano was a legitimate act of war.
cynic
- 06 Aug 2015 12:52
- 61929 of 81564
that's seriously interesting and just helps to highlight how little we know of what is going on behind closed doors
TANKER
- 06 Aug 2015 13:02
- 61930 of 81564
bob Geldof is a parasite and very dishonest piece of scum asking working class to help the unfortunate while he prays on their misfortune .
cynic
- 06 Aug 2015 13:11
- 61931 of 81564
unbelievable ...... just turned to the cricket and find that Australia have been skittled for just 60!!! ...... England 13 for no loss at lunch
ExecLine
- 06 Aug 2015 13:16
- 61933 of 81564
TANKER
- 06 Aug 2015 13:55
- 61935 of 81564
watching the cricket its great . and free
ExecLine
- 06 Aug 2015 18:08
- 61936 of 81564
News, notes and ramblings from the Mozilla project
Mozilla
An Open Letter to Microsoft’s CEO: Don’t Roll Back the Clock on Choice and Control
Chris Beard
JUL 30 2015
Satya,
I am writing to you about a very disturbing aspect of Windows 10. Specifically, that the update experience appears to have been designed to throw away the choice your customers have made about the Internet experience they want, and replace it with the Internet experience Microsoft wants them to have.
When we first saw the Windows 10 upgrade experience that strips users of their choice by effectively overriding existing user preferences for the Web browser and other apps, we reached out to your team to discuss this issue. Unfortunately, it didn’t result in any meaningful progress, hence this letter.
We appreciate that it’s still technically possible to preserve people’s previous settings and defaults, but the design of the whole upgrade experience and the default settings APIs have been changed to make this less obvious and more difficult. It now takes more than twice the number of mouse clicks, scrolling through content and some technical sophistication for people to reassert the choices they had previously made in earlier versions of Windows. It’s confusing, hard to navigate and easy to get lost.
Mozilla exists to bring choice, control and opportunity to everyone. We build Firefox and our other products for this reason. We build Mozilla as a non-profit organization for this reason. And we work to make the Internet experience beyond our products represent these values as much as we can.
Sometimes we see great progress, where consumer products respect individuals and their choices. However, with the launch of Windows 10 we are deeply disappointed to see Microsoft take such a dramatic step backwards.
These changes aren’t unsettling to us because we’re the organization that makes Firefox. They are unsettling because there are millions of users who love Windows and who are having their choices ignored, and because of the increased complexity put into everyone’s way if and when they choose to make a choice different than what Microsoft prefers.
We strongly urge you to reconsider your business tactic here and again respect people’s right to choice and control of their online experience by making it easier, more obvious and intuitive for people to maintain the choices they have already made through the upgrade experience. It also should be easier for people to assert new choices and preferences, not just for other Microsoft products, through the default settings APIs and user interfaces.
Please give your users the choice and control they deserve in Windows 10.
Sincerely,
Chris Beard
CEO, Mozilla
MaxK
- 06 Aug 2015 19:57
- 61937 of 81564
Windows 10 is de debil's spawn!
jimmy b
- 06 Aug 2015 22:03
- 61938 of 81564
Fred1new Send an email to Fred1new View Fred1new's profile - 06 Aug 2015 12:25 - 61927 of 61940
JB,
Forgot!
It Falklands only 8000 miles from Nelson Column, just down the road from Buk Palace!
Bloody barmy, expensive ego trip for a failing Prime minister.
================================
Still OUR islands Fred ,, if you buy a house down south well away from your home does that give me the right to go and squat in it ?