Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

Optimist - 29 Oct 2007 18:58 - 6213 of 11003

TP

It looks a nice setup. Another way would be to get a really small/cheap laptop running Win XP Pro. Load the camera software on that, and fix the lid so you can close it without switching off. You could then use Remote Desktop over WiFi to control the computer. Essentially you would be doing with the cheap laptop the same as Cannons USB to WiFi but half the price. Alternatively, you could use a micro desktop PC with no screen or keyboard. Tis would be more robust.

If you use this method, you will have to modify the registry to allow 24 bit colour over Remote Desktop but that is easy to do.

Optimist - 29 Oct 2007 19:05 - 6214 of 11003

TP

I wouldn't reccommend the USB1 kit but the first item is USB2 and the you can use 4 off the second item to give you a 20 metre cable.

Edit In theory, you could conect the frst item the USB over IP server to a wireless base station and you have yourself the Cannon unit for 120. Setup could be interesting but worth a try.

ThePublisher - 29 Oct 2007 19:17 - 6215 of 11003

Opt,

I'm going to have to go off line in a mo'.

I'll need to re-read what you have suggested but I really would prefer some WiFi solution so that I can put my Asus somewhere safe and not have cable anywhere anyone can trip over it.

I presume that means getting the contact with the camera using USB to something almost dumb that can be hung on the tripod or my belt and then using that device to transmit by WiFi to my Asus on safe and solid table, maybe 20 feet/yards away.

Let's see what we can come up with - but maybe not this evening if you don't mind.

TP

Optimist - 29 Oct 2007 19:35 - 6216 of 11003

TP

The USB over IP server to a wireless base station would be completely dumb and your Asus laptop would do all of the work. If you decided to put a small computer next to you camera, then that wold do all of the proessing with your Asus providing the screen, keyboard and mouse over WiFi.

Have a good evening.

scussy - 29 Oct 2007 23:40 - 6217 of 11003

someone said about SD card for mem,
i just got a couple of THESE for my dig camera,i can now take 700 photos at 7m,
looks good value and fast taking shots,

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 00:14 - 6218 of 11003

There is nothing wrong with SD RAM for cameras, the ones that you have bought are amongst the best but they have a transfer rate of 20MB/Sec The DDR2-400 memory that is in the device TP was looking at has a max transfer rate of 3.2GB/sec - 160 times faster.

Even the 20GB claim seems fast, that implies a continuous shooting rate of around 4 pics a second with your camera and transfering the entire contents of the card to your computer in under 2 minutes.

ValueMax - 30 Oct 2007 00:35 - 6219 of 11003

Can anyone help with this...?

I have a 120GB SATA hard disk which I can see in the control panel > system > devices list. The problem is that I cannot see it in Windows Explorer so can't copy any data to it. What do I need to do?

ThePublisher - 30 Oct 2007 07:43 - 6220 of 11003

VM,

I'm not one of the experts around here. But until they surface I suggest that you look for ways of 'mapping' the drive.

Don't worry. The others will know the fix.

TP

ThePublisher - 30 Oct 2007 07:54 - 6222 of 11003

Optimist,

Back on line. Can we carry on the conversation, please.

Do you want to point me to a URL for the sort of kit you are suggesting.

EDIT. Ah now I realise you were suggesting the top item in that list as part of the kit. Isn't it mains powered?

And then we need to add on a WiFi transmitter I guess. And that would also need to be battery powered.

Ready to investigate when you are.

TP

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 08:53 - 6223 of 11003

VM

On XP Start Button - Control Panel - Administrative tools - Computer Management. Then click on Disk management.

Control panel has to be in Classic View for the above to work but there are several alternative ways to get there. You must be logged in with Administrator rights.

Be careful.

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 09:12 - 6224 of 11003

TP

Battery power is more of a problem. You could get a uninteruptable power supply and bolt everything to a board but that will be getting bulky and heavy.

The more I think of it, your best bet is a cheap laptop. Best to get a 2nd hand one with WiFi, USB2 and XP Pro. If you fix it so that it will run with the lid closed then it should not get in the way, will be fairly sturdy and battery life should be better because the screen would cut off. It will essentially do what the Cannon WiFi link will do but should do it better because all the processing will be done close to the camera.

The only problem that I can see is if your camera software requires a better display driver than remote desktop can provide. That is easy to check, set your laptop to allow remote desktop, log into it from another computer and see if it will run.

ThePublisher - 30 Oct 2007 09:52 - 6225 of 11003

Opt,

OK, I think I can do the test.

My studio computer is not normally on WiFi but I have a little USB WiFi add-on.

I could take the Asus into the studio and see if they can communicate via WiFi.

Assuming that I get that far I could set up remote desktop on the studio machine and see if the Asus can take over control.

I can then plug the camera into the studio machine and see what happens.

My one concern at the moment is that, if it does work, if I follow your suggestion of having a second hand laptop attached to the camera and the Asus viewing at a distance I would then have to take two laptops to the assignment.

Yes it would save a few hundred pounds but it is one more thing to carry, drop or go wrong. I'd feel happier using one of those lovely old Librettos at the camera end, but all the new generation laptops seem much more delicate these days.

Any suggestions?

TP

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 10:09 - 6226 of 11003

TP

I guess that only you can balance the cost / risks / conveinience. It makes you appreciate the Cannon device but they are still in rip off territory. Would another option be to upgrade your camera to one that has built in WiFi?

ThePublisher - 30 Oct 2007 10:18 - 6227 of 11003

Opt,

None of the pro quality DSLR's have built in WiFi, sadly.

So can we go back to the original question which was how to add more memory to that Samsung.

Clearly not with a camera card!!!

TP

Out taking some autumn shots whilst we have this lovely light. Back in 30 mins.

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 10:54 - 6228 of 11003

TP

Not so good news on that, check out this link to Crucial. They say that it will only take 1GB.

Of course, that device would also serve as the laptop in the RD option that I suggested.

ThePublisher - 30 Oct 2007 11:24 - 6229 of 11003

Opt,

Thanks for that pointer. It seems that people have added more memory, but only by taking the machine apart.

Still window shopping.

Any view on this Asus.

Bearing in mind my needs. Primarly something that I can display pictures on and a possible secondary benefit of a travellable mail and web site reader.

I see it is Linux but it says it is XP compatible. Presumably that means it would handle the camera download software.

TP

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 11:40 - 6230 of 11003

I've taken a quick look at it.

It says that the hardware is XP compatible, so you would have to trash th O/S and install Win XP but it will be tight on disk space. In theory, you could run XP in VMWare on the existing O/S but I doubt that it has the power, memory or disk space for that.

ThePublisher - 30 Oct 2007 11:42 - 6231 of 11003

Thanks Opt,

I did not realise that XP compatible meant you could not run Windows XP type software.

Thank goodness for people like you!

TP

Optimist - 30 Oct 2007 12:13 - 6232 of 11003

The important bit is hardware is XP compatible.
Register now or login to post to this thread.