for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Seq
Prat with drawn post 6245.

lol.

seq
I have never given any one verbal violence, well may be one, but not you seq you know we all love you. Long or short or even in the middle.

Seq, you do come across like you know a fair bit and could be a very welcome contributor to this board. It's a real shame you have to let yourself down by antagonising everyone at the drop of a hat. Everytime you come on this board it goes down hill - why you behave like you have a permanent chip on your shoulder is beyond me. I welcome your constructive comments but like a petulant child you belittle yourself over and over again!

This is as good as prime ministers question time..

Chiva- look up the word "craic".
If everyone just stuck to making money long or short, lots more of it would be made.
Go on one of the MAM courses and watch people doing that -live-you can`t fall in love with a share and try to talk it up.
If enough people "ride the waves", on shares like this , the true situation of the co. would soon be revealed, they call it `bashing`, people who want to make money call it ` being shrewd`.If its falling in price there is a reason for it, follow it down, and see if there is support level, then when it bounces,long it up again.
Its a simple market out there, idiots like the two/three resident rampers here, and on a dozen other threads have an agenda to discourage negativity, shorting and any comments that make them look fools .I care not in the long if I make mistakes, as long as I make money on average, take the pee when I am wrong, i`ll bat the ball straight back-if I can be bothered,
oh good luck.

Chiva Hi,

Only a few of my investment decisions are based on Golden Crosses, there has to be a good reason for it.

50 MA crossing a rising 200 MA with incresed volume.

Also MichaelsWalters.com has just released a tip "Is there more to come at Northern Petroleum? You bet. "

Cheers,
PM

well there it goes another tick down- who has the balls to call it now then?-I stick to 22p

I went to the same school Seq, although I'm guessing you're probably more experienced. Most 'pee' (as you put it) is a mere craic - happy to keep it that way if you are.

Good luck also.

Thanks for your feedback Paul.

fairplay Chiva,
I mean good luck sincerely, God knows its hard to beat the system these days, all weapons are fair, if they are legal,well nearly so is close

cheers

Now below MA50

Paul,

I just looked at the photo of stacked FrogPacks on eBay. The photograph gives the impression of a tightly packed stack. However, try it with real cartons and you'll see that 33% of the volume is wasted. 33% more space needed is a lot. Also, the stack is not stable, more like a house of cards....

Niels.

PS: Good luck with your NOP shares. :)

NielsJensen
May be they are not meant to be stacked, just posted after it is assembled, can you disassemble it after use?

niels,

i thought the same thing......balancing frogpacks versus square boxes - for example; in delivery vans (or any storage facility for that matter), may cause a problem........

but if frogpack takes off for its "packaging benefits", then i suppose that the storage facilities will simply need to use some sort of light shelving or pidgeon-hole mechanism to deal with it......which they probably already have.

ebay FrogPack link
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=19278&item=5587922751&rd=1&ssPageName=WDVW

nice one.

but, that pic only shows part of the solution...

what happens when you get 8 brown ones, and 5 whites ones (ie; a couple of different sizes)??.....hhhmmmmmmm.......

Now imagine seeing that stack from the side. I have made a stack exactly as the one above and it is unstable and wastes 33% of the volume.

Sorry to but in but i thought the advantage of frogpak was that it packs flat so can be stored eaisly in warehouses etc before use. Sorry Niels i can't see how 33% space is wasted, 2 packs should sit on top of 1 with only slight wastage of space at the bottom and top of the stack due to the curve.

Sorry Niels just looked at it again and you're right!