Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

will wrote earlier .....
Separate refugees from migrants. UK needs to take it's share of the refugees. Restrict economic migrants. The two are separate.


absolutely so, and something i have written myself on several occasions
really can't be bothered even to skim through the rest of today's ramblings and rants

===============

aldo - if you want to hold rather than trade, MBH has already proved to be a "good little worker", and of the housebuilders, i'm also a fan of BVS and TEF

Lardy arse my foot you know absolutely nothing about me so keep your vile views to yourself . You come onto a BB telling us to take in endless people we know nothing about , various people have told you their feelings and you still bang on and on . Take a hike .

Fred what's Morals got to do with it , people are making money out of people smuggling etc .

The Syrian refugees have refuge in Turkey. As soon as they leave the refugee camp and try to enter Greece, they become economic migrants. That's why Cameron (who, incidentally, is doing a very good job!) has said he will take refugees from the camps, and the camps alone.

But I do have a solution. Greece sells Lesbos to Russia. Greece's debt burden is eased. Putin gets some labour for those Siberian mines.

Simples innit? Dunno why nobody else has thought of it.

will - Fine having a balanced view BUT inferring that UK kids can't get of their arses. And posters on here should get off their lardy arses, isn't going to win you many votes on how to influence people and win friends poll now is it :0)

Fred- Just Foxtrot Oscar. Now that is a balanced view.

62628 - and also, if refugees are taken directly and solely from syrian-based refugee camps, it will be much easier to determine exactly who they are and similar

Will10

I am not opposed to doctors, nurses and other skilled immigrants. I do not want unskilled economic migrants who just want to move to a more prosperous country.

a house builder would not be posting on here he a tosser

Victi . Sorry to upset you. Where did you get the endless from. Simply said UK should do its share and help refugees from war torn areas. 100k a year would be no problem for us . If you're saying your will not do anything fine I get it. I would say those that have everything could give a little to those with nothingm . Mass immigration was never voiced. Get over yourself.
And change your attitude

Tanke . Why?

SOD OFF BLOODY KNOW ALL .

Chris. My bad. Based on my experience accept it may not apply to all.

Given that Cameron fought an election on the basis that he would target net migration in the tens of thousand, 100k refugees a year seems pretty endless to me. :o)

Vicitim. Hit a nerve??

Hilary. Chinless wonder didn't live up to his election promises then. Missed by a mile I would say.

Quite the Man aren't we .

i think 100k refugees a year is actually too many, but why can (almost) none of you differentiate between true refugees (eg syrians) and eu-citizen chancers (by far the greatest bulk of the migrants) and similar who come over without jobs to go to, and many without any useful qualifications either?

Because, Cyners, people who travel hundreds or thousands of miles are rarely chancers. By virtue of the fact they're prepared to migrate across borders (and continents) to make a better life for themselves, they're predominantly also diligent and hard working, and become net contributors to the economy.

Sure, there are exceptions, but the benefits tourism thing is something that's primarily blown up out of proportion for the Daily Mail readership.

read what i wrote please!

Don't be such an arrogant tosser, and I did read what you wrote!!!

You stated that the majority of immigrants are chancers. I don't believe they are.

That doesn't mean that they should be allowed in.