for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Seq - Having spent many months working in Dublin I know well how the word is spelt and what it means - my version referred to our favourite basher with the two eyes - hence cra-ii-c - a JOKE as we professionals call it.

wiif wiif

sd

pm1
You cannot put a link on a header only a Web Site address; I will have a word when he gets back.

We miss you Bo-osley, oh yes we do-o
When you're not near to us, we're blu-ue
When you come back to us, we're re-ed
We'd rather be SP's than de-ead

Exisdogtial

sd LOL!! :-)

Driver Hi,

Are you not allowed by MAM to put a link in the header ?

If you are allowed, I would just use the 'insert website link' posting option, then copy the code that it creates, and add it to the header.

Cheers,
PM


http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

The option to 'insert website link' is not available once the Header has been created.

pth

PTH Hi,

But you can copy the html code from a normal post, and put it in manually, outer tags removed to show the code ....

a href="http://www.stanelco.devisland.net" target="_blank">http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

As you can see, I just added it to post 6268 :)

Cheers,
PM

pm1
It's not that you are not allowed, It's that you don't the 'insert website link' posting option,

Driver Hi,

But you can still use html code, and put the link in manually, as I did when I edited post 6268, because the option to insert link is not available when editing posts either ...

Cheers,
PM

Hi All,

Bema on FYB yesterday sent a collection of shareholders questions to Stanelco, and has recieved a reply in the early hours of this morning !

Please do not copy the post here, but view it via this link ....

http://www.fillyaboots.com/f7/forum_posts.asp?TID=1889&PN=1&TPN=42

There are several questions that I asked, purely to show what a liar iidiot is, and the answers prove it, see my post following the reply if by any extreme outside chance, you don't guess which one's I asked :)

Cheers,
PM

what a load of bollox, what did you expect him to come out with?-this PMT is a loony- AND WHO ASKED HIM TO " REPRESENT OTHER SHAREHOLDERS".
They must be very impressed getting mail from a bb called "fillyaboots", real touch of class there.

I'm not happy about some of the answers. I cannot see a problem with the statement "sales are bouyant". Obviously they are not. Why?

Enthusiastic (previously) holder.

Paul - I read lots of "To our knowledge" and NO "We confirm" - means a lot of difference. Anyone can say anything "to my knowledge" but it means nothing - not true or false.

I see Howard White denies the 27,000 conversions you have been ramping - IMO - around everywhere.

When you read the replies, taking it they are genuine ? - you come away feeling they are struggling - very few orders - nothing like what you have ramped - IMO - it up to be.

Lets get out of here ii is posting again.

The supposed answers to the questions from FYB posters to SE0 are very negative - Howard White denies PM1s ramping - IMO - claim of 27000 machines.

The questions are mostly "known to SE0" and of course they can say no. The other questions they reply with "not to our knowledge" again meaning nothing.

They fail to say "We confirm" just leave everything open with "Not to our knowledge" or "Not known to Stanelco".

So no 27000 machines PM1 - and also they have minimal orders and no need to recruit engineers to install the machines - well if you sell only 1 or 2 you do not need to many people.

Take a look at FYB page 41/42 of the new SE0 thread - the answers can give even the most positive SE0 supporter the bad vibes.

Sequestor - in PMT's defence - it was not him who came up with the idea of sending a letter it was someone else on the other board.

They have been asking questions like "where did the 27,000 figure come from" and decided to send a letter to SEO with questions compiled from many of the BB members.

Now some of the questions were niave and some of the answers were less than helpful - but I do not think you should be knocking PM for posting the reply that they received.
If Paul had not copied the response across - then I would have.

So far as I am concerned - it means there is a line of communication open to the senior execs. and they are willing to communicate on non price sensitive issues. The more communication and confirmed data the better. Lets not forget that he is running a business and is probably in the middle of several deals - some of which will be a bit hairy and could even be conflicting with each other. ( eg Walmart may only be prepared to deal on an exlusive basis - but SEO may have other supermarkets trying to do the same deal) - lets wait and see.

Baza

The really interesting answers, for me, are the no comment ones. This really could be a case of no comment, or it could be touching on areas where negotiations are taking place and the real answer would be commercially sensitive. If it is the latter, that would bode well for the USA arm.
Alan

Hi All,

ii lied about competition, there is NONE, he lied about the other technologies, NOT ONE has 3 or more of the benefits of the EIGHT main Greenseal benefits, ii lied about Ultrasonic and Laser welding, BOTH are NON-STARTERS, ii lied about 'The Age of Reason Foundation', it has NO ACTIVITIES, it is a PRIVATE foundation, ii lied about competetive products, NO products, even more expensive one's can offer ALL the benefits of Greenseal.

ii is a lying basher, end of story.

Cheers,
PM

PM - I think your comments re ii are a given - no one takes much notice of them anyway - especially as most have filtered him.

Baza

I knew this letter was being sent, and I didnt think they was going to get any response at all, I agree with baza any information is good for the investor to make there decisions on an investment especially when it comes from the horses mouth. Good questions good answers, what we got any way.