Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


driver - 20 Jun 2005 19:15 - 6266 of 27111

pm1
You cannot put a link on a header only a Web Site address; I will have a word when he gets back.

stockdog - 20 Jun 2005 19:31 - 6267 of 27111

We miss you Bo-osley, oh yes we do-o
When you're not near to us, we're blu-ue
When you come back to us, we're re-ed
We'd rather be SP's than de-ead

Exisdogtial

wilbs - 20 Jun 2005 19:43 - 6268 of 27111

sd LOL!! :-)

paulmasterson1 - 20 Jun 2005 20:48 - 6269 of 27111

Driver Hi,

Are you not allowed by MAM to put a link in the header ?

If you are allowed, I would just use the 'insert website link' posting option, then copy the code that it creates, and add it to the header.

Cheers,
PM


http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

ptholden - 20 Jun 2005 20:54 - 6270 of 27111

The option to 'insert website link' is not available once the Header has been created.

pth

paulmasterson1 - 20 Jun 2005 21:59 - 6271 of 27111

PTH Hi,

But you can copy the html code from a normal post, and put it in manually, outer tags removed to show the code ....

a href="http://www.stanelco.devisland.net" target="_blank">http://www.stanelco.devisland.net

As you can see, I just added it to post 6268 :)

Cheers,
PM

driver - 20 Jun 2005 22:46 - 6272 of 27111

pm1
It's not that you are not allowed, It's that you don't the 'insert website link' posting option,

paulmasterson1 - 21 Jun 2005 07:42 - 6273 of 27111


Driver Hi,

But you can still use html code, and put the link in manually, as I did when I edited post 6268, because the option to insert link is not available when editing posts either ...

Cheers,
PM

paulmasterson1 - 21 Jun 2005 07:58 - 6274 of 27111


Hi All,

Bema on FYB yesterday sent a collection of shareholders questions to Stanelco, and has recieved a reply in the early hours of this morning !

Please do not copy the post here, but view it via this link ....

http://www.fillyaboots.com/f7/forum_posts.asp?TID=1889&PN=1&TPN=42

There are several questions that I asked, purely to show what a liar iidiot is, and the answers prove it, see my post following the reply if by any extreme outside chance, you don't guess which one's I asked :)

Cheers,
PM

Sequestor - 21 Jun 2005 08:10 - 6275 of 27111

what a load of bollox, what did you expect him to come out with?-this PMT is a loony- AND WHO ASKED HIM TO " REPRESENT OTHER SHAREHOLDERS".
They must be very impressed getting mail from a bb called "fillyaboots", real touch of class there.

halfamil - 21 Jun 2005 08:23 - 6276 of 27111

I'm not happy about some of the answers. I cannot see a problem with the statement "sales are bouyant". Obviously they are not. Why?

Enthusiastic (previously) holder.

insiderinside - 21 Jun 2005 08:40 - 6277 of 27111

Paul - I read lots of "To our knowledge" and NO "We confirm" - means a lot of difference. Anyone can say anything "to my knowledge" but it means nothing - not true or false.

I see Howard White denies the 27,000 conversions you have been ramping - IMO - around everywhere.

When you read the replies, taking it they are genuine ? - you come away feeling they are struggling - very few orders - nothing like what you have ramped - IMO - it up to be.

driver - 21 Jun 2005 08:56 - 6278 of 27111

Lets get out of here ii is posting again.

mouseb.gif

insiderinside - 21 Jun 2005 09:12 - 6279 of 27111

The supposed answers to the questions from FYB posters to SE0 are very negative - Howard White denies PM1s ramping - IMO - claim of 27000 machines.

The questions are mostly "known to SE0" and of course they can say no. The other questions they reply with "not to our knowledge" again meaning nothing.

They fail to say "We confirm" just leave everything open with "Not to our knowledge" or "Not known to Stanelco".

So no 27000 machines PM1 - and also they have minimal orders and no need to recruit engineers to install the machines - well if you sell only 1 or 2 you do not need to many people.

Take a look at FYB page 41/42 of the new SE0 thread - the answers can give even the most positive SE0 supporter the bad vibes.

bhunt1910 - 21 Jun 2005 09:17 - 6280 of 27111


Sequestor - in PMT's defence - it was not him who came up with the idea of sending a letter it was someone else on the other board.

They have been asking questions like "where did the 27,000 figure come from" and decided to send a letter to SEO with questions compiled from many of the BB members.

Now some of the questions were niave and some of the answers were less than helpful - but I do not think you should be knocking PM for posting the reply that they received.
If Paul had not copied the response across - then I would have.

So far as I am concerned - it means there is a line of communication open to the senior execs. and they are willing to communicate on non price sensitive issues. The more communication and confirmed data the better. Lets not forget that he is running a business and is probably in the middle of several deals - some of which will be a bit hairy and could even be conflicting with each other. ( eg Walmart may only be prepared to deal on an exlusive basis - but SEO may have other supermarkets trying to do the same deal) - lets wait and see.

Baza

hewittalan6 - 21 Jun 2005 09:25 - 6281 of 27111

The really interesting answers, for me, are the no comment ones. This really could be a case of no comment, or it could be touching on areas where negotiations are taking place and the real answer would be commercially sensitive. If it is the latter, that would bode well for the USA arm.
Alan

paulmasterson1 - 21 Jun 2005 09:36 - 6282 of 27111


Hi All,

ii lied about competition, there is NONE, he lied about the other technologies, NOT ONE has 3 or more of the benefits of the EIGHT main Greenseal benefits, ii lied about Ultrasonic and Laser welding, BOTH are NON-STARTERS, ii lied about 'The Age of Reason Foundation', it has NO ACTIVITIES, it is a PRIVATE foundation, ii lied about competetive products, NO products, even more expensive one's can offer ALL the benefits of Greenseal.

ii is a lying basher, end of story.

Cheers,
PM

bhunt1910 - 21 Jun 2005 09:48 - 6283 of 27111

PM - I think your comments re ii are a given - no one takes much notice of them anyway - especially as most have filtered him.

Baza

driver - 21 Jun 2005 09:52 - 6284 of 27111

I knew this letter was being sent, and I didnt think they was going to get any response at all, I agree with baza any information is good for the investor to make there decisions on an investment especially when it comes from the horses mouth. Good questions good answers, what we got any way.

Sequestor - 21 Jun 2005 09:58 - 6285 of 27111

If you want to see PMT`s crap demolished without the need of filtering others who disagree- look at the share price , look at the vol., look at the lack of news, look at the prat ramping half a dozen other cos. on any bb available- apart from the ones he is banned from-posting 24/7 on free bb`s is a dead giveaway- professional ramper- time he was banned from here MAM.
Register now or login to post to this thread.