goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
cynic
- 02 Oct 2015 14:37
- 63518 of 81564
fred is just a (deluded) utopian, but he hasn't much longer to live, so be kind and considerate to him :-)
TANKER
- 02 Oct 2015 15:44
- 63519 of 81564
fred is just a sad old person jealous and filled him with a jealous cancer eating him away
so on reflection ignore him and he may live longer
Fred1new
- 02 Oct 2015 17:31
- 63520 of 81564
Manuel,
Have you taken your own pulse lately?
-==-=-=-
Interesting the Welfare state and NHS was said to be utopian by the neocons and fascists of the tory party in 1948.
In spite of the torrid party it still exists, and tory even with tory mismanagement is still improving.
-=-=-=--
You belong to a bygone age and should be laid to rest!
cynic
- 02 Oct 2015 17:44
- 63521 of 81564
i have indeed ..... i even check my blood pressure on a fairly regular basis too as i have one of these clever gadgets at home
it is extraordinary how you are incapable of uncoupling yourself from 50/70 years ago
fwiw, my comment was much more general as to your views on life and how we should conduct ourselves
almost needless to say, like a moth to the flame, you felt compelled to link my comment to something about which you could have your pavlovian political sneer and swipe
i am afraid it is exactly that that everyone here finds so dull and tiresome, some more vociferously and waspish than others
cynic
- 02 Oct 2015 17:49
- 63522 of 81564
US rate increase - a view
While it's always important not to over-react to one single data release, we'll make an exception in this case," said Paul Ashworth, chief US economist at Capital Economics.
"The chances of a rate hike by the Fed this year just went way down," he added, saying he expects the central bank will wait until early 2016 for an increase.
Before today's release, Federal Reserve chair Janet Yellen had said policymakers expected a rate rise this year. The Fed meets on 27-28 October and again in December.
============
i am not so convinced, and if it is delayed, the shock when it comes is likely to have a much more vicious impact on the markets
Fred1new
- 02 Oct 2015 17:54
- 63523 of 81564
Manuel.
I think the 5-6 year prior to the period suggested was more formative. I have no wish to deny it. But, at the least I can say I enjoyed it and don't feel cheated!
But, of course, it needs the likes of me to help you to realise how inferior you are and to help you to keep a check on your more grasping nature.
Get back to your pots, you know you were happy there.
-=-=-==-=
Happy days are here again.
---=-=-=
Fred1new
- 02 Oct 2015 18:00
- 63524 of 81564
Ps.
The market, at the moment, is a minefield and the bookies are doing well.
Thank God we have Cameron.
We know he won't do anything and if he does he will reverse it the next day.
Watch and wait!
8-)
cynic
- 02 Oct 2015 18:01
- 63525 of 81564
i have always enjoyed my perceived inferiority, for it can be very useful indeed .....
it's certainly much better than considering yourself superior when all about you can see it's as real as the emperor's new clothes
jimmy b
- 02 Oct 2015 18:02
- 63526 of 81564
cynic bashful ?
Fred1new
- 02 Oct 2015 18:41
- 63527 of 81564
Tongue in cheek is better than snivelling!
Chris Carson
- 02 Oct 2015 19:03
- 63528 of 81564
If Fred was one of these, there would have to be a draw by volunteers in the rush to bury him :0)
Dozens of bodies to go unburied because of gravedigger shortage
The Labour-run Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council told grieving relatives that no one can be buried in any of their eight cemeteries for three weeks, blaming funding cuts
By Christopher Hope, Chief Political Correspondent4:42PM BST 02 Oct 2015 Comments6 Comments
Dozens of bodies will not be buried by a council in Staffordshire this month because of a shortage of grave diggers.
The Labour-run Newcastle Under Lyme Borough Council has told grieving relatives that no one can be buried in any of their eight cemeteries for three weeks, blaming funding cuts.
The news has echoes of the Winter of Discontent in the late 1970s when bodies went unburied because of strike action by council workers.
The Labour-run council blamed the decision on huge delays due to “staff shortages”. It said that it has to make £2.1million worth of cuts in 2016.
The council said that apart from on two days - October 5 and 12 - no-one can be buried at its eight cemeteries in Kidsgrove, Audley, Chesterton, Keele, Knutton, Madeley, Newcastle and Silverdale.
Typically the cemeteries bury 10 bodies a week which means that as many as 30 bodies might not be buried during the three week period.
Local funeral directors have been asked to store the bodies while they await burial.
Tim McGough, president of the Stoke-on-Trent and District Funeral Directors Association, said: “This is going to put a strain on families and on funeral directors too.
“It's terribly sad that this situation has arisen. It has never happened in Newcastle before and let's hope it won't happen again.
“It will certainly cause a backlog and there will be a delay in funerals because once the service resumes again all of the slots will be booked up quickly.”
He added: “We have to play catch-up at Easter and Christmas and they are only four-day closures, so this will put people under a lot of pressure.
“I am sure funeral directors will take care of people as best they can during this time.
“But our main aim is to make sure families can say goodbye as soon as they possibly can.”
Residents branded the delays as 'ridiculous'.
Grandfather-of-four Peter Cotton, 78, of Knutton, said: "There is surely always a demand for funerals and they should have had the staff in place.
"It is ridiculous that this has happened and will cause undue upset to people waiting to bury a loved-one."
Mechanic and father-of-two Gary Harper, 48, said: "I just hope none of my relatives drops dead in the next few weeks then. This is a complete farce."
Mature student Ian Cannings, 30, said: "I'm sure the council, are trying their best in difficult circumstance but they must have seen this coming.
"Surely there must be some council staff who can step in to keep it all going?
"How complex a skill is it to bury a body? It makes Britain look like a third-world country doesn't it."
A TaxPayers' Alliance spokesman branded the situation a “disgrace” and an “insult” to grief-stricken families - adding: “It should never have been allowed to happen.”
Newcastle Borough Council said it has brought in the restrictions as it re-shuffles its funeral services - to try to cope with the staffing issues.
Ann Beech, cabinet member for cemeteries and crematorium, said: “We have some short-term staffing issues which mean we have had to put temporary measures in place.
“But I would stress this is only for a limited period of time and our normal service will be resumed shortly.
“We apologise for any convenience this situation has caused.”
During the Winter of Discontent, Liverpool City Council was forced to rent a factory in Speke to store corpses until they could be buried.
The Department of Environment noted at the time that there were 150 bodies stored at the factory at one point, with 25 more added every day.
cynic
- 02 Oct 2015 20:05
- 63529 of 81564
fred as a gravedigger or a corpse?
do we have a choice?
Chris Carson
- 02 Oct 2015 20:35
- 63530 of 81564
He's been digging graves for years has earned a rest!
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2015 11:17
- 63531 of 81564
Now Jeremy Corbyn economic adviser wants to raise £100billion by taxing the spending from your bank account
Richard Murphy, who is credited as the creator of 'Corbynomics', said the Chancellor George Osborne should start to tax people’s money as they spend it from their bank accounts
Britons should be levied with a new £100billion "tax on consumption" paid directly from their bank accounts, according to Jeremy Corbyn's tax adviser.
Richard Murphy, who drafted some of Mr Corbyn's economic policies during the Labour leadership campaign, said people's money should be taxed as they spend it.
The controversial measure is set out in Mr Murphy’s new book, called The Joy of Tax, which is published this week.
Mr Murphy says in the book that the new consumption tax could raise over £100billion a year and replace National Insurance Contributions, which disproportionately hits poorer people.
It says: “I think that a progressive tax on the total sum paid into and out of people’s and companies’ bank accounts is now essential.
“This simply requires that the rate charged increase as the total payments into and out of bank accounts connected to a person increase.
“This is the tax that can, in the 21st century, end the absurd need to tax labour and its wealth creation and instead shift that tax to excessive consumption, a shift we know is now needeeasing
He explains in the book: “It is entirely possible to tax all transactions through bank accounts that a person or company operates.”
Mr Murphy's book "The Joy of Tax" also includes his draft of a possible Budget speech in which he brands the consumption tax as the Carbon Usage Tax.
Speaking to The Telegraph, Mr Murphy said he would put the idea to Mr Corbyn, the Labour leader. He said this was "the next thing" after Mr Cobyn adopted his idea for people’s quantitive easing
MaxK
- 03 Oct 2015 11:34
- 63532 of 81564
I wonder what Mr Murphy thinks VAT, Income tax, NI, stamp duty etc is?
Also, by taking a £100billion out of private hands, and handing it to the chaps, it will improve the economy??
Chris Carson
- 03 Oct 2015 11:40
- 63533 of 81564
Typical loony left. If they had their way they would tax the air we breathe and still fcuk up the economy.
required field
- 03 Oct 2015 17:02
- 63534 of 81564
The Americans are round the bend with allowing (mental cases/muppets) with guns....and they've bombed a hospital in Afganistan....really bonkers....Barack Obama has a tough job....can't they ban weapons in the United States (except for hunter rifles of course) ?...
cynic
- 03 Oct 2015 17:20
- 63535 of 81564
i think the constitution enshrines the right to carry guns
of course it's got totally ridiculous, but the gun lobby is very strong and there's a lot of votes to be lost if sensible legislation could ever be put through
it's unbelievable how many americans still think the way to stop this sort of thing is for ever more guns to be carried, even into schools
Haystack
- 03 Oct 2015 18:20
- 63536 of 81564
The US attitude, including survivors of yesterday's shooting, is that if more people were allowed to carry concealed weapons then they could stop these shootings quickly.
cynic
- 03 Oct 2015 18:33
- 63537 of 81564
i am aware of the (il)logic
at least obama doesn't agree, but given the way us politics work, there isn't a hope in hell of getting any sort of limitation bill through
i wonder when or if the us public will ever say enough is enough, for there's not much sign of it today