goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Haystack
- 07 Oct 2015 23:40
- 63682 of 81564
Jeremy Corbyn snubs the Queen, saying he is too busy to be sworn in to the Privy Council
Labour leader had been expected to be sworn in at the meeting, the first since he became Labour leader last month
Jeremy Corbyn has snubbed the Queen by refusing to be sworn into the Privy Council on Thursday, as it emerged he could use a loophole to join the advisory body without ever meeting Her Majesty.
The Labour leader, a lifelong republican, is known to have reservations about kneeling in front of the Queen and kissing her hand as he swears an oath of allegiance to her, which is the normal process when a new Privy Councillor is sworn in.
And having refused to sing the National Anthem at a Battle of Britain 75th anniversary service last month, Mr Corbyn tried to dodge the issue by saying he could not attend tomorrow’s meeting due to unspecified “prior engagements”.
The Telegraph has learnt that Mr Corbyn could choose to avoid meeting the Queen altogether, using a mechanism called an Order in Council, by which the Privy Council, including the monarch, agrees to appoint a new member without them being present.
For that to happen Mr Corbyn, who has never met the Queen, would still have to confirm that he had taken the oath, but would avoid kneeling before the sovereign.
If he does so, it is understood he would be the first Leader of the Opposition to refuse to be sworn in the presence of the monarch. Orders in Council are usually used only for Privy Council members who are based abroad, such as prime ministers of Commonwealth realms.
One member of the Council was appalled at the snub, saying: “Firstly it is deeply insulting and secondly it is not grown up – not to go to see the monarch is just extraordinary.
“I am sure that what they would have done is not make him kneel. But what this really means is that he is not prepared to put himself in the position of a serious leader who can be trusted.”
The Queen, who returned to London from her summer holiday in Balmoral on Wednesday, will meet her Privy Councillors for the first time in 10 weeks on Thursday at Buckingham Palace, and might reasonably have expected Mr Corbyn to take the opportunity to be sworn, a process which gives him the right to receive government intelligence briefings.
One Whitehall source said: “The whole point is that he is entering into an agreement with the State which gives him access to material and creates a relationship of trust.
"If he were to go down the route of becoming a member through an Order in Council that would probably be an indication that he never intended to attend.
"He is under no obligation to attend in person but any leader of the Opposition would normally be expected to be there."
Mr Corbyn was invited by David Cameron to join the Privy Council when he phoned him to congratulate him on becoming Leader of Her Majesty’s Most Loyal Opposition, to use his full title, after he was chosen by the Labour Party on September 12.
It was then up to his staff to contact Buckingham Palace and confirm the date when he will attend to be sworn. Buckingham Palace does not issue a formal invitation.
Mr Corbyn’s spokesman said the Labour leader was invited to attend Thursday’s meeting but had sent his apologies, citing “prior engagements”. A source close to Mr Corbyn insisted: "It's not a snub."
He declined to say when he might attend a meeting of the Council, saying: “That needs to be resolved. I don’t know what his timetable is.”
The Privy Council, whose origins date back to Norman times, has more than 600 members, including government ministers, bishops and judges, but only a handful usually attend its monthly meetings.
Mr Corbyn’s predecessors Ed Miliband and Gordon Brown were already members of the Privy Council when they became Labour leader, having previously been Cabinet ministers, while Tony Blair was sworn in six days after becoming Labour leader. David Cameron was sworn just over a week after becoming Tory leader, and his immediate predecessors were already members through previous front bench experience.
Michael Foot, Labour’s most left-wing leader of recent decades before Mr Corbyn, was already a member when he led the party, and Neil Kinnock was sworn just over two weeks after he was elected leader.
Typically a leader of the opposition will only attend one meeting of the Privy Council, but Mr Corbyn has questioned whether the Leader of the Opposition should have to join the Council at all.
Asked last month if he would kneel in the ceremony, he told the BBC: “'I didn’t know that was involved actually. So we'll have to find out about it, OK?”
Sir Alan Duncan, a Conservative MP and a Council member, said: “‘The Queen has always put herself above politics, but Jeremy Corbyn seems to want to put his politics above the Queen.
“This is not so much about snubs, insults or ceremonies: it’s more about whether Jeremy Corbyn wants to be a serious political figure or just a perpetual rebel.”
Tory MP Keith Simpson, a member since last year, said: “It is a snub for the Queen in the sense that she is a constitutional Monarch and she represents the constitutional way in which we do business.”
“Either he has got a more important engagement – I can’t think what, or I suspect he is trying to delay the moment.
“Once you are sworn in as a Privy Councillor then you can be told certain things in confidence and as far as the Leader of the Opposition is told you are told things that are serious.
“If you are not sworn in, you can’t be told. It may be that he does not want to be constrained by being told things that involve national security."
The Cabinet Office, which speaks on behalf of the Privy Council, and Buckingham Palace both declined to comment.
The news came as Tony Blair said it would be inappropriate to talk about Mr Corbyn during a visit to the 9/11 memorial and refused to mention the new Labour leader by name.
In response to a question about whether he welcomed Mr Corbyn’s election Mr Blair said he would not answer, “particularly not here in this museum memorial to 9/11.”
Mr Corbyn has described the killing of Al Qaeda mastermind Osama Bin Laden as a "tragedy".
jimmy b
- 08 Oct 2015 08:14
- 63683 of 81564
Wasn't Cameron just great Fred . I love a Tory get together .
Fred1new
- 08 Oct 2015 08:17
- 63684 of 81564
jb,
Yes, it reminds of the Bullingdon club and being high on mind-altering drugs and the long-term effects.
jimmy b
- 08 Oct 2015 08:20
- 63685 of 81564
Every time i listen to Corbyn i think i'm on LSD ,nice chap that he seems .
cynic
- 08 Oct 2015 08:24
- 63686 of 81564
63682 - i've no objection to that at all; it's the hypocrisy of insisting on keeping a kosher home (at least strictly no pork or shellfish and similar) but making a mockery of those rules once out
Fred1new
- 08 Oct 2015 08:35
- 63687 of 81564
Jb,
Check what goes into your coffee!
I often think you are on LSD.
-=-=-=-
I thought Manuel's had 2 kitchens.
iturama
- 08 Oct 2015 08:44
- 63689 of 81564
Is Corbyn a schlock, schmuck, schemozzle or schlemiel? Or do all of them fit?
MaxK
- 08 Oct 2015 09:29
- 63690 of 81564
I suspect Cameroon has to pinch himself every morning.
hilary
- 08 Oct 2015 09:38
- 63691 of 81564
Would that be before or after he's checked the location of his genitalia, Max?
cynic
- 08 Oct 2015 09:46
- 63692 of 81564
fred - i don't have two houses and nor have i ever lived in a kosher let alone glatt kosher home :-)
iturama - undoubtedly just a schlemiel lording over a schemozzle, but he's certainly no schmuck
iturama
- 08 Oct 2015 11:22
- 63693 of 81564
A couple of observations while flicking channels:
Last night. A young woman being evicted from benefit assisted accommodation by bailiffs. I must phone mum she said pulling out her rose gold iPhone 6S plus.
Today. Male Syrian migrant at German "refugee" camp calling his wife in Damascus by Skype. Would try to get her over. Escaped to avoid possible military service. Would go back if there was peace.
Fred1new
- 08 Oct 2015 12:06
- 63694 of 81564
Wouldn't you?
jimmy b
- 08 Oct 2015 12:12
- 63695 of 81564
I suppose all our young men who were called up to fight in the second world war should have run away to somewhere instead of dying in Europe fighting for your freedom Fred.
hilary
- 08 Oct 2015 12:21
- 63696 of 81564
I learned all about Damascus at school. Apparently it kills 99% of all known germs. :o)
Haystack
- 08 Oct 2015 12:27
- 63697 of 81564
Did you domestic science then; cooking, housekeeping, ironing, being a good wifey?
hilary
- 08 Oct 2015 12:41
- 63698 of 81564
That's what you have an au pair for, H.
MaxK
- 08 Oct 2015 12:51
- 63699 of 81564
Courtesy of mro over the road.
Goodbye Sweden
June 2, 2015
This is the last post on this blog. I am leaving Sweden for good shortly, and will no longer be following its descent from what was once the third most prosperous country in the world. Frankly, it’s just too damn depressing.
I was born and raised in Sweden, which leaves a cultural mark even though I moved to USA in the 1990s and have spent the better part of my adult life as an American. Coming back for a few years has been a shocking experience.
When I was a child, Sweden was a dull yet very safe place to live. Yes, there was a heavy blanket of socialism and collectivist values covering everything, but there was a core of pragmatism beneath the redness. The intention and goal was always to benefit the citizens, even though they went about things in a backwards manner.
More:
http://swedenreport.org/
Fred1new
- 08 Oct 2015 13:02
- 63700 of 81564
JB.
A lot of the upper echelons of society escaped to America and elsewhere, but prepared to sacrifice somebody else's life for their goods.
Look it up!
-----
Domestics seem to have missed one or two!
Fred1new
- 08 Oct 2015 13:32
- 63701 of 81564
Max,
I am sure that he will leave a noticeable hole in Sweeden by his absence.