goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 23 Oct 2015 11:48
- 64063 of 81564
Stan,
And in flying saucers!
They are everywhere!
All over the place.
8-)
Stan
- 23 Oct 2015 12:11
- 64064 of 81564
This is true -):
Haystack
- 23 Oct 2015 12:26
- 64065 of 81564
Jimmy
This is one source of the figures.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/
Look down the page and you will find the ICM polls. You can find various others on the interweb, such as MORI etc.
jimmy b
- 23 Oct 2015 12:32
- 64066 of 81564
Cheers Hays , they are all very different .Who knows what will happen nearer the time .
I still think we may vote out .
Haystack
- 23 Oct 2015 12:46
- 64067 of 81564
On balance I would like to leave, but I think we will stay due to fear. I am happy with the Common Market aspect but I don't want ever closer political union leading inevitably to federalism.
cynic
- 23 Oct 2015 14:04
- 64069 of 81564
germany - economic asylum seekers
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11945890/Germany-to-deport-economic-migrants-in-military-transport-planes.html?ref=yfp
sorry but i don't know how to set that as a proper link
anyway, the article is well worth reading, with a slight caveat that it comes via the telegraph, and of course its political stance is very well known
in a nutshell, germany's great philanthropic open-door policy for all refugees whether political or economic is suddenly in reverse ...... economic and asylum-refusals are no longer welcome and will apparently be deported in droves
we in uk always grizzle at the lack of action against asylum-refusals, but germany has exactly the same problem, but on a larger scale
Stan
- 23 Oct 2015 14:12
- 64070 of 81564
Stop winding Jimmy no jumper up Alf.
Fred1new
- 23 Oct 2015 14:34
- 64071 of 81564
Re-lighting of Germany to their 1933 period of enlightenment!
Reminds me of Oswald Mosleys early days.
Always believe in the needs and purity of one's own race.
I wonder what race will have me!
aldwickk
- 23 Oct 2015 15:18
- 64072 of 81564
The underwater boat race
ps Fred and Stan would make two good whores
Haystack
- 23 Oct 2015 17:50
- 64073 of 81564
MaxK
- 23 Oct 2015 21:44
- 64074 of 81564
Soon, it wont make any difference who you vote for, you will always get €U.
Eurozone crosses Rubicon as Portugal's anti-euro Left banned from power
Constitutional crisis looms after anti-austerity Left is denied parliamentary prerogative to form a majority government
Portugal's president: 'This is the worst moment for a radical change to the foundations of our democracy'
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
4:30PM BST 23 Oct 2015
Portugal has entered dangerous political waters. For the first time since the creation of Europe’s monetary union, a member state has taken the explicit step of forbidding eurosceptic parties from taking office on the grounds of national interest.
Anibal Cavaco Silva, Portugal’s constitutional president, has refused to appoint a Left-wing coalition government even though it secured an absolute majority in the Portuguese parliament and won a mandate to smash the austerity regime bequeathed by the EU-IMF Troika.
He deemed it too risky to let the Left Bloc or the Communists come close to power, insisting that conservatives should soldier on as a minority in order to satisfy Brussels and appease foreign financial markets.
"Democracy must take second place to the higher imperative of euro rules and membership."
“In 40 years of democracy, no government in Portugal has ever depended on the support of anti-European forces, that is to say forces that campaigned to abrogate the Lisbon Treaty, the Fiscal Compact, the Growth and Stability Pact, as well as to dismantle monetary union and take Portugal out of the euro, in addition to wanting the dissolution of NATO,” said Mr Cavaco Silva.
More:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11949701/AEP-Eurozone-crosses-Rubicon-as-Portugals-anti-euro-Left-banned-from-power.html
Fred1new
- 24 Oct 2015 08:03
- 64075 of 81564
required field
- 24 Oct 2015 11:49
- 64076 of 81564
Portugese president looks like something out of "clear and present danger" !.....
cynic
- 24 Oct 2015 15:02
- 64077 of 81564
portugal
a very very strange state of affairs ......
how on earth can the president of a democratic country be allowed to arbitrarily decide that it will not allow the party that gained an overall majority to take power?
Haystack
- 24 Oct 2015 15:36
- 64078 of 81564
The same can happen here. The current government is allowed to stay in power until a vote of no confidence. We have had minority governments here in the past. If the Portuguese government is voted down then there are several options. One is to still leave the existing PM in power until the next elections, which would be next June after a new president is voted in some time early next year as he is coming up for reelection. He could just let the left wing party take power with their coalition partners such as the Communist party.
The left's intentions are quite severe and far tougher than Greece. They want to leave the Euro, not pay back most of their debt, nationalise all transport, nationalise the banks, increase spending on health and public employees, spend on infrastructure etc. How they will pay for it all is a mystery. No one will buy their bonds or lend them money. They risk a return to the stone age in terms of their finances.
cynic
- 24 Oct 2015 15:56
- 64079 of 81564
if the report is correct, the left was presumably the winner of the greatest number of seats and had formed a workable coalition which would give an overall majority
if the first part is correct, then thank goodness our own constitution would not allow action such as has been taken in portugal
that the policies of this coalition may be appalling to us and the rest of europe, to deny the right to rule on the basis of "i don't like you even if you have the most seats" is imposed dictatorship
Haystack
- 24 Oct 2015 17:17
- 64080 of 81564
We have had minority governments when the sum of the other parties would give them a majority. Even if Labour plus SNP had the majority, Cameron could have chosen to continue as a minority government. That is until a no confidence vote. We have no written constitution in the UK.
cynic
- 24 Oct 2015 17:22
- 64081 of 81564
you're being very obtuse today ......
this is the key ..... the left (party) was presumably the winner of the greatest number of seats ..... add other parties who have agreed to coalesce and they have an overall majority, but that is the second part
Haystack
- 24 Oct 2015 17:34
- 64082 of 81564
Sorry. I thought you realised that the centre-right got the most seats. The left came second, but add the communists and it is a majority.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34611274
Their arrangements may be similar to here. The PM in the UK is still the PM after the election irrespective of the results, even if he got no seats at all. It is then up to him to resign. If he doesn't then he faces a no coincidence vote. It was possible for Cameron to have had a minority government if he would not resign.