markymar
- 03 Dec 2003 11:36
mitzy
- 17 Jan 2012 18:54
- 6412 of 6492
yes indeed.
coeliac1
- 23 Jan 2012 07:57
- 6417 of 6492
Morning marky. I am impressed you are still inhabiting this bb. What amused me was the appointment of an exploration director when the one thing DES can't do is explore as they don't have the cash. I see they handed out some SARs the other day, which looks a bit odd and yet another example of the directors helping themselves at the expense of shareholders.
cynic
- 24 Jan 2012 10:48
- 6421 of 6492
while i understand the logic for buying into DES, for myself, i'ld rather play the %ages by buying say 1000 RKH rather than 10,000 DES
HARRYCAT
- 24 Jan 2012 10:54
- 6422 of 6492
I thought it was considered unwise to put all of your eggs into one basket?
cynic
- 24 Jan 2012 11:08
- 6423 of 6492
i haven't ..... i've also taken modest positions in fogl and bord, albeit that they are a long way south ...... if DES flies, so will RKH albeit that the dreaded damned lies and statistics would say that i would make a greater % return (in theory) on DES
btw, i note that DES's sp is now well underpinned at 30
HARRYCAT
- 24 Jan 2012 11:16
- 6425 of 6492
I chose the ARG route. Not keen on DES as nothing material yet to support the sp.
HARRYCAT
- 24 Jan 2012 11:52
- 6427 of 6492
That's not quite true marky. There are areas which are 100% owned by RKH. It is not a foregone conclusion that the co-owned areas are going to interest the big boys.
cynic
- 02 Feb 2012 16:37
- 6430 of 6492
please re-post your chart then!
from your comment, "red" is clearly DES, but no idea who "blue" is