Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

That is what Chamberlain attempted to practice in the 30s.

-====--

I suppose you can boost Putin position by giving him back the Ukraine and bits of Poland.

-=-==

But, perhaps, the Russian Military may have learnt from their mission in Afghanistan and advise Putin differently.

==-==-


Perhaps, we can then bomb some of the African state Nigeria, Cameroon, Niger Chad, Yemen. Somalia, Kenya etc. etc. etc.

Nice places for safe havens.
-=-===-=-=

Mind we could bomb the hell out of Paris as they seem to have a hell of a lot of terrorists there.

=======

Dave will sort it our for me!

Thank God for St Crispin.

I think I will go back to playing chess.


Simpler than politics and war games.

An account of Corbyn's performance yesterday during the Prime Minister's statement

Contempt scented the air, deadly as poison: QUENTIN LETTS sees a leader humbled

Labour backbenchers gave Jeremy Corbyn a frightful kicking in the Commons Chamber.

Their lusty disrespect electrified the House, setting off whispering, cluckings and low-key laughter.

Loyalty to party leader was thrown aside.

Labour rebels did not even try to look doleful as they set about him. Piranhas razoring into an angler’s shin might have shown daintier manners – a greater sense of ‘no, Clarence, after you’.

Yesterday lunchtime’s session, a Prime Ministerial statement about the Paris terror attacks, thus became unexpectedly significant.

Though it may be too early to announce the Corbyn death spiral, his travails yesterday allowed Mr Cameron to nudge the notion of an imminent Commons vote on bombing Syria.

The PM artfully weighted this with modest acknowledgements that of course the House would decide, the House would be the ultimate arbiter, it would be the House, not he, the peachy Etonian, that took us to war. They liked that.

Beside Mr Corbyn sat Hilary Benn, shadow foreign secretary, who plainly thinks Mr Corbyn’s endorsement of the Stop the War lobby is barmy.

During his speech Mr Corbyn kept fluffing words and managed to called President Hollande ‘Francoise’.

He dawdled, losing both his thread and the House. He developed a frog in his throat, like Iain Duncan Smith in the most dog days as Opposition leader.

Around the Chamber, Hon Members started talking to their neighbours. Contempt, which in Parliament can be as fatal as vaporised arsenic, scented the air. A few disbelieving grins.

Mr Benn remembered some urgent matter demanding his presence elsewhere. Exit. Andy Burnham, Chris Bryant and Rosie Winterton were all summoned to unknown engagements.

Exeunt. Behind Mr Corbyn sat his critic John Mann (Lab, Bassetlaw), scowling with such magnifying-glass ferocity, the nape of the Corbyn neck must have burned. Some Labour MPs stared in agony at the ceiling. Geraint Davies (Swansea W) shielded his eyes, as though watching Dr Who. Ann Coffey (Stockport) dug into her right ear’s seam of wax. Pain displacement?

During Mr Corbyn’s speech, the Labour silence was sticky, sullen. But when Mr Cameron was speaking, they nodded and often mooed their approval.

Mr Corbyn slumped in his seat, one glum beardie in his trademark oatmeal jacket. He looked amateur. Hapless. Hopeless.

Mr Cameron’s own awkward squad was comparatively muted. Crispin Blunt (Reigate), John Baron (Billericay) and Mark Field (Westminster) kept their scepticism polite.

When Ulster’s Nigel Dodds (Belfast N) said that politicians who tried to excuse terrorism should be ‘ashamed of themselves’, he glowered at Mr Corbyn.

Widespread agreement among Labour MPs was undeniable.

Chris Leslie (Nottingham E) said it should be ‘immediately obvious to everyone – to everyone’ that the police should be allowed to kill marauding terrorist lunatics.

That repeated ‘to everyone’ was delivered with a heavy gesture towards Mr Corbyn. The Labour leader busied himself with his BlackBerry.

Emma Reynolds (Wolverhampton NE), sitting near Mr Leslie and Streatham’s Chuka Umunna, said people who accused the West of bringing troubles on its own people were ‘wrong and disgraceful’.

Her words thudded into their intended target, who was still pretending to be gripped by some email message on his BlackBerry.

And so it continued: blatant attacks on Mr Corbyn, varying in severity, from the likes of Pat McFadden, David Hanson, Ian Austin. I saw Yvette Cooper make a face at her friend Mr McFadden.

Her discreet expression had ‘ye gods’ written all over it.

Mr Cameron stroked the Labour benches, complimenting MPs there, telling usual opponents that he agreed with them ‘100 per cent’. Mr Corbyn sank a little lower in his seat. At one point he was alone on the front bench save for Diane Abbott and, er, Barry Gardiner, who is a good Christian.

When even Barry scarpered, he was replaced by that stateswoman de nos jours, Nia Griffith.

Labour’s deputy chief whip appeared at the back door and sent forward a few human shields to sit near the isolated Corbyn. But by then the day, and possibly more, had been lost.

seems to me that fred's solution would just be nice cosy chats with IS (with coffee and sandwiches of course), asking them not to be naughty boys and what nice pressie would they like to persuade them to agree

I may not know what is the most appropriate action is in Syria, but I do know that it is stupid to pour water on boiling oil.

If it is on fire try to think of a way of smothering it, or choking it oxygen supply.

That is what Corbyn and Blunt are saying to me.

How come all the type has turned italic all of a sudden?

It hasn't for me. Maybe you are not sitting up straight (possible leaning quite a bit left).

Probably your sixth glass of gin Stan.

-): well isn't that strange, it only changes to italics on pressing post.

Ah back to normal now we are on another page.

post 64815

At least Corbyn faces up to his own party, while Wavey Dave ducks and weaves his own backbenchers, while pumping himself up and trying to get himself noticed on the stage abroad.

He is now leading a minority government!

=-===


Has Georgie Boy rewritten his budget yet?

Put the LSD away stan !!

Stan,

There does seem a problem when posting sometimes.

I get duplications which I put down to me being cack-handed.

perhaps coffee and sandwiches will do the trick eh?

certainly mustn't do anything to upset those IS chappies, 'cos they'll get very cross and beastly indeed, and then what will do?
put forward some mug to refill their coffee mugs?

A Conservative poster from the 1980s and just as relevant today

"Put the LSD away stan !!".. it's all in shares JTB so I can't.

cynic Send an email to cynic View cynic's profile - 18 Nov 2015 10:12 - 64816 of 64825

seems to me that fred's solution would just be nice cosy chats with IS (with coffee and sandwiches of course), asking them not to be naughty boys and what nice pressie would they like to persuade them to agree

-=-==-=

At the end of the day there will have to be "talk TalK" to settled the multitude of problems, what I prefer is actions prior to that which don't escalate the number of innocent people killed for other people's satisfaction preceding the talking.

Nor do I want to see the armament financiers and "gun runners" moving the "money" on to another event.

Putting the actions down to being "pragmatic" and "the way it is" and if I don't do it somebody else will, so why shouldn't I profit.

Benefitting from the sacrifice of other people's lives.

"Not putting their own lives on the line but playing war games from their own armchairs and cheering the others on."

=-==-=-=

I would like to see "those" concerned in the atrocities, at the Hague trying to defend themselves.

so what are you ACTUALLY proposing in your "actions prior to talk-talk"?

It looks like the terrorists killed and arrested this morning may have been about to commit a bombing today. There could be others about to do the same. In the 'ticking bomb' scenario, do torture the ones arrested today?

I am not in favour of the death penalty, but the French do have an event method of dealing with treason. They guillotine you face up.

torture?
good heavens no ...... merely some friendly questioning over a cup of coffee with steak frites on the house at lunchtime